Technical Papers
May 17, 2021

Effect of Base-Level Inerters on the Higher Mode Response of Uplifting Structures

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 8

Abstract

Allowing slender structures to uplift has been used as an efficient means of controlling their seismic response. Oftentimes rocking structures will exhibit some degree of flexibility and cannot be adequately represented by single-mass or rigid systems. In this paper, we examine the dynamic response of multistory flexible rocking bodies equipped with inerters at their ground level. First, numerical models of inerter-equipped rocking structures are formulated and validated. These models are used to assess the effect of the inerter on the elastic deformations and base rotations demands of a set of structures ranging from 3 to 9 stories. Importantly, we examine the interaction between impact forces and higher vibration modes and evaluate the effectiveness of the inerter in controlling the associated acceleration demands and increased bending moments along the height. The efficiency of the inerter was not found to be affected by practical variations of the stiffness of the rocking surface. Although the inerter increased the moment demands at the first level, the proposed strategy successfully controlled seismic demands along the height of the structure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID), Grant No. 72170284.

References

Acikgoz, S., and M. DeJong. 2012. “The interaction of elasticity and rocking in flexible structures allowed to uplift.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (15): 2177–2194. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.21.
Acikgoz, S., and M. DeJong. 2014. “The rocking response of large flexible structures to earthquakes.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (2): 875–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9538-0.
Acikgoz, S., and M. DeJong. 2016. “Analytical modelling of multi-mass flexible rocking structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (13): 2103–2122. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2735.
Acikgoz, S., Q. Ma, A. Palermo, and M. DeJong. 2016. “Experimental identification of the dynamic characteristics of a flexible rocking structure.” J. Earthquake Eng. 20 (8): 1199–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1138169.
Avgenakis, E., and I. Psycharis. 2020. “Modeling of inelastic rocking bodies under cyclic loading.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (4): 04020020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001751.
Baker, J. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Barkan, D. 1962. Dynamics of bases and foundations. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Cacciola, P., A. Tombari, and A. Giaralis. 2020. “An inerter-equipped vibrating barrier for noninvasive motion control of seismically excited structures.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 27 (3): e2474. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2474.
Chatzis, M., and A. Smyth. 2012. “Modeling of the 3D rocking problem.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 47 (4): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.02.004.
Chopra, A. 2000. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering: International series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chopra, A., and S. C. S. Yim. 1985. “Simplified earthquake analysis of structures with foundation uplift.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 906–930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(906).
DeDomenico, D., and G. Ricciard. 2018. “An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI).” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (5): 1169–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3011.
Dimitrakopoulos, E., and A. Giouvanidis. 2015. “Seismic response analysis of the planar rocking frame.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (7): 04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000939.
Dominguez, J., and J. Roesset. 1978. Dynamic stiffness of rectangular foundations. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gazetas, G. 1983. “Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: State of the art.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 2 (1): 2–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(83)90025-6.
Housner, G. 1963. “The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53 (2): 403–417.
Hwang, J., J. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2007. “Rotational inertia dampers with toggle bracing for vibration control of a building structure.” Eng. Struct. 29 (6): 1201–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.005.
Ikago, K., K. Saito, and N. Inoue. 2012. “Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous damper.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (3): 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1138.
Kibriya, L., C. Málaga-Chuquitaype, M. Kashani, and N. Alexander. 2018. “Nonlinear dynamics of self-centring rocking steel frames using finite element models.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.036.
Lazar, I., S. Neild, and D. Wagg. 2014. “Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (8): 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2390.
Makris, N. 1997. “Rigidity–plasticity–viscosity: Can electrorheological dampers protect base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions?” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (5): 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199705)26:5%3C571::AID-EQE658%3E3.0.CO;2-6.
Makris, N., and G. Kampas. 2016a. “Seismic protection of structures with supplemental rotational inertia.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (11): 04016089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001152.
Makris, N., and G. Kampas. 2016b. “Size versus slenderness: Two competing parameters in the seismic stability of free-standing rocking columns.” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am 106 (1): 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150138.
Makris, N., and Y. Roussos. 2000. “Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions.” Géotechnique 50 (3): 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.3.243.
Makris, N., and M. Vassiliou. 2015. “Dynamics of the rocking frame with vertical restrainers.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001231.
Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., C. Menendez-Vicente, and R. Thiers-Moggia. 2019. “Experimental and numerical assessment of the seismic response of steel structures with clutched inerters.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 121 (Jun): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.016.
Marian, L., and A. Giaralis. 2014. “Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 38 (Oct): 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. Scott, and G. Fenves. 2009. Open systems for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual—OpenSees version-2.1.0. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Pan, X., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2020. “Seismic control of rocking structures via external resonators.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (15): 1180–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3284.
Papageorgiou, C., N. Houghton, and M. Smith. 2008. “Experimental testing and analysis of inerter devices.” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 131 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3023120.
Priestley, M., and A. Amaris. 2002. Dynamic amplification of seismic moments and shear forces in cantilever walls. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
Psycharis, I. 1983. “Dynamics of flexible systems with partial lift-off.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11 (4): 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110405.
Smith, M. 2002. “Synthesis of mechanical networks: The inerter.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 47 (10): 1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2002.803532.
Thiers-Moggia, R. 2020. “Seismic control of rocking structures using inerters.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London.
Thiers-Moggia, R., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2019. “Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (5): 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3147.
Thiers-Moggia, R., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2020a. “Dynamic response of post-tensioned rocking structures with inerters.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 187 (Dec): 105927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105927.
Thiers-Moggia, R., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2020b. “Seismic control of flexible rocking structures using inerters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (14): 1519–1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3315.
Truniger, R., M. Vassiliou, and B. Stojadinovic. 2015. “An analytical model of a deformable cantilever structure rocking on a rigid surface: Experimental validation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2795–2815. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2609.
Vassiliou, M. 2017. “Seismic response of a wobbling 3D frame.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (5): 1212–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3013.
Vassiliou, M., K. Mackie, and B. Stojadinovié. 2017. “A finite element model for seismic response analysis of deformable rocking frames.” Earthquake. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (3): 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2799.
Vassiliou, M., R. Truniger, and B. Stojadinovié. 2015. “An analytical model of a deformable cantilever structure rocking on a rigid surface: Development and verification.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2775–2794. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2608.
Wiebe, L., and C. Christopoulos. 2009. “Mitigation of higher mode effects in base-rocking systems by using multiple rocking sections Supplement,.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (S1): 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813315.
Yim, S., and A. Chopra. 1985. “Simplified earthquake analysis of multistory structures with foundation uplift.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (12): 2708–2731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:12(2708).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 8August 2021

History

Received: Jul 26, 2020
Accepted: Jan 27, 2021
Published online: May 17, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rodrigo Thiers-Moggia, Ph.D.
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW72AZ, UK.
Christian Málaga-Chuquitaype, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-7374 [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW72AZ, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-7374. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Response of seismic isolated structures with supplemental rotational inertia, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3709, 51, 12, (2956-2974), (2022).
  • Uniform risk spectra for rocking structures, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3691, 51, 11, (2610-2626), (2022).
  • Performance-based seismic design and assessment of rocking timber buildings equipped with inerters, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113164, 248, (113164), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share