Technical Papers
Feb 22, 2021

Combined Use of Rocking Walls and Inerters to Improve the Seismic Response of Frame Structures

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper investigates the possibility to enhance the seismic response of a frame structure by the combined use of an external rocking wall and some inerters attached to both the frame and wall. This innovative mechanical assemblage is introduced by means of a reduced-order three-degrees of freedom model. The latter is constituted by a two-degree of freedom linear system, used as a model for a multistory frame structure, and a rigid block, which represents the rocking wall. The frame–wall connection is represented by an elastic link that spans the top of the block to the first story of the frame structure. Some inerters attached to both the frame and the block are considered to provide some apparent inertia forces. The nonlinear equations of motion are obtained and successively numerically integrated, considering seismic base motions. An extensive parametric analysis is performed and the results are summarized in gain maps that show the ratio of the maximum displacements or drifts of coupled and uncoupled systems, thus providing a measure of the seismic enhancements that derive from the coupling. It is found that there are wide regions of the adopted base parameters where coupling is effective. Results also show that the use of inerters increases the effectiveness of coupling with block, thus enabling the use of smaller blocks. Finally, the proposed procedure, based on the spectrum-compatibility criterion, appears able to serve as a useful preliminary design tool for selecting the main characteristics of a system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Specifically the following data are available: (1) all the data on the results; and (2) the source code of the numerical integration procedure.

References

Aghagholizadeh, M., and N. Makris. 2018. “Earthquake response analysis of yielding structures coupled with vertically restrained rocking walls.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (15): 2965–2984. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3116.
Andreaus, U. 1990. “Sliding-uplifting response of rigid blocks to base excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19 (8): 1181–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190808.
Bachmann, J., M. Vassiliou, and B. Stojadinović. 2017. “Dynamics of rocking podium structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (14): 2499–2517. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2915.
Brzeski, P., T. Kapitaniak, and P. Perlikowski. 2016. “The use of tuned mass absorber to prevent overturning of the rigid block during earthquake.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 16 (10): 1550075. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500753.
Caliò, I., and M. Marletta. 2003. “Passive control of the seismic response of art objects.” Eng. Struct. 25 (8): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00045-2.
Cappelli, E., A. Di Egidio, and F. Vestroni. 2020. “Analytical and experimental investigation into the behavior of a rocking masonry tuff wall.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (6): 04020048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001775.
Ceravolo, R., M. Pecorelli, and L. Zanotti Fragonara. 2016. “Semi-active control of the rocking motion of monolithic art objects.” J. Sound Vib. 374: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.038.
Ceravolo, R., M. Pecorelli, and L. Zanotti Fragonara. 2017. “Comparison of semi-active control strategies for rocking objects under pulse and harmonic excitations.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 90: 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.12.006.
Collini, L., R. Garziera, K. Riabova, M. Munitsyna, and A. Tasora. 2016. “Oscillations control of rocking-block-type buildings by the addition of a tuned pendulum.” Shock Vib. 2016 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8570538.
Contento, A., and A. Di Egidio. 2014. “On the use of base isolation for the protection of rigid bodies placed on a multi-storey frame under seismic excitation.” Eng. Struct. 62–63 (Mar): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.019.
Decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e Trasporti. 2008. “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni.” [In Italian.] In Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Lazio, Italy: Decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e Trasporti.
DeJong, M., and E. Dimitrakopoulos. 2014. “Dynamically equivalent rocking structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (10): 1543–1563. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2410.
de Leo, A., G. Simoneschi, C. Fabrizio, and A. Di Egidio. 2016. “On the use of a pendulum as mass damper to control the rocking motion of a non-symmetric rigid block.” Meccanica 51 (11): 2727–2740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0448-5.
Di Egidio, A., R. Alaggio, A. Aloisio, A. de Leo, A. Contento, and M. Tursini. 2019a. “Analytical and experimental investigation into the effectiveness of a pendulum dynamic absorber to protect rigid blocks from overturning.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 115 (Oct): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.04.011.
Di Egidio, A., R. Alaggio, A. Contento, M. Tursini, and E. Della Loggia. 2015. “Experimental characterization of the overturning of three-dimensional square based rigid block.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 69 (Mar): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.12.003.
Di Egidio, A., and A. Contento. 2009. “Base isolation of sliding-rocking non-symmetric rigid blocks subjected to impulsive and seismic excitations.” Eng. Struct. 31 (11): 2723–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.021.
Di Egidio, A., and A. Contento. 2010. “Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a constrained oscillating base.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3028–3039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.022.
Di Egidio, A., A. de Leo, and A. Contento. 2019b. “The use of a pendulum dynamic mass absorber to protect a trilithic symmetric system from the overturning.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2019 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4843738.
Di Egidio, A., A. de Leo, and G. Simoneschi. 2016. “Effectiveness of mass-damper dynamic absorber on rocking block under one-sine pulse ground motion.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 98 (Jan): 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.10.015.
Di Egidio, A., C. Olivieri, and A. de Leo. 2020a. “Protection from overturning of rigid block-like objects with linear quadratic regulator active control.” Struct. Control Health Monitor. 27 (10): e2598. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2598.
Di Egidio, A., S. Pagliaro, C. Fabrizio, and A. de Leo. 2019c. “Dynamic response of a linear two d.o.f system visco-elastically coupled with a rigid block.” Coupled Syst. Mech. 8 (4): 351–375. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2019.8.4.351.
Di Egidio, A., S. Pagliaro, C. Fabrizio, and A. de Leo. 2020b. “Seismic performance of frame structures coupled with an external rocking wall.” Eng. Struct. 224 (Dec): 111207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111207.
Di Egidio, A., G. Simoneschi, C. Olivieri, and A. de Leo. 2017. “Protection of slender rigid blocks from the overturning by using an active control system.” In Proc., 23rd Conf. of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 230–240. Berlin: Springer.
Di Egidio, A., D. Zulli, and A. Contento. 2014. “Comparison between the seismic response of 2d and 3d models of rigid blocks.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 13: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0219-z.
Dimitrakopoulos, E., and M. DeJong. 2012. “Overturning of retrofitted rocking structures under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (8): 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000410.
Fabrizio, C., A. de Leo, and A. Di Egidio. 2017a. “Structural disconnection as a general technique to improve the dynamic and seismic response of structures: A basic model.” Procedia Eng. 199 (Jan): 1635–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.086.
Fabrizio, C., A. de Leo, and A. Di Egidio. 2019. “Tuned mass damper and base isolation: A unitary approach for the seismic protection of conventional frame structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (4): 04019011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001581.
Fabrizio, C., A. Di Egidio, and A. de Leo. 2017b. “Top disconnection versus base disconnection in structures subjected to harmonic base excitation.” Eng. Struct. 152 (Dec): 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.041.
Housner, G. 1963. “The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53 (2): 404–417.
Iervolino, I., C. Galasso, and E. Cosenza. 2010. “Rexel: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 8 (2): 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1.
Kounadis, A. N. 2013. “Parametric study in rocking instability of a rigid block under harmonic ground pulse: A unified approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 45 (Feb): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.10.002.
Makris, N. 2014. “A half-century of rocking isolation.” Earthquake Struct. 7 (6): 1187–1221. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1187.
Makris, N., and M. Aghagholizadeh. 2017. “The dynamics of an elastic structure coupled with a rocking wall.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (6): 945–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2838.
Makris, N., and M. Aghagholizadeh. 2019. “Effect of supplemental hysteretic and viscous damping on rocking response of free-standing columns.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (5): 04019028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001596.
Makris, N., and G. Gholamreza Moghimi. 2019. “Displacements and forces in structures with inerters when subjected to earthquakes.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (2): 04018260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002267.
Makris, N., and G. Kampas. 2016. “Seismic protection of structures with supplemental rotational inertia.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (11): 04016089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001152.
Makris, N., and J. Zhang. 2001. “Rocking response of anchored blocks under pulse-type motions.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (5): 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(484).
Pompei, A., A. Scalia, and M. Sumbatyan. 1998. “Dynamics of rigid block due to horizontal ground motion.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (7): 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:7(713).
Psycharis, I. N., M. Fragiadakis, and I. Stefanou. 2013. “Seismic reliability assessment of classical columns subjected to near-fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (14): 2061–2079. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2312.
Shenton, H. 1996. “Criteria for initiation of slide, rock, and slide-rock rigid-body modes.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (7): 690–693. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:7(690).
Shenton, H., and N. Jones. 1991. “Base excitation of rigid bodies. I: Formulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 117 (10): 2286–2306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:10(2286).
Simoneschi, G., A. de Leo, and A. Di Egidio. 2017a. “Effectiveness of oscillating mass damper system in the protection of rigid blocks under impulsive excitation.” Eng. Struct. 137 (Apr): 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.069.
Simoneschi, G., A. Geniola, A. de Leo, and A. Di Egidio. 2017b. “On the seismic performances of rigid blocks coupled with an oscillating mass working as TMD.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (9): 1453–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2864.
Simoneschi, G., C. Olivieri, A. de Leo, and A. Di Egidio. 2018. “Pole placement method to control the rocking motion of rigid blocks.” Eng. Struct. 167 (Jul): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.016.
Spanos, P., and A. Koh. 1984. “Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic shaking.” J. Eng. Mech. 110 (11): 1627–1642. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:11(1627).
Thiers-Moggia, R., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2018. “Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (5): 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3147.
Tung, C. 2007. “Initiation of motion of a free-standing body to base excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (10): 1431–1439. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.703.
Vassiliou, M., K. R. Mackie, and B. Stojadinović. 2014. “Dynamic response analysis of solitary flexible rocking bodies: Modeling and behavior under pulse-like ground excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (10): 1463–1481. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2406.
Vassiliou, M., and N. Makris. 2012. “Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (2): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1124.
Voyagaki, E., I. Psycharis, and G. Mylonakis. 2013. “Rocking response and overturning criteria for free standing rigid blocks to single–lobe pulses.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 46 (Mar): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.11.010.
Yim, C., A. Chopra, and J. Penzien. 1980. “Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 8 (6): 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080606.
Zhang, J., and N. Makris. 2001. “Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (5): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(473).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Jul 7, 2020
Accepted: Dec 18, 2020
Published online: Feb 22, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of L’Aquila, L’Aquila 67100, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-5641. Email: [email protected]
Stefano Pagliaro
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of L’Aquila, L’Aquila 67100, Italy.
Cristiano Fabrizio, Ph.D.
Dept. of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of L’Aquila, L’Aquila 67100, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share