Technical Papers
Jan 29, 2021

Full-Waveform Inversion of Incoherent Dynamic Traction in a Bounded 2D Domain of Scalar Wave Motions

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper presents a full-waveform inversion method for reconstructing the temporal and spatial distribution of unknown, incoherent dynamic traction in a heterogeneous, bounded solid domain from sparse, surficial responses. This work considers SH wave motions in a two-dimensional (2D) domain. The partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained optimization framework is employed to search a set of control parameters, by which a misfit between measured responses at sensors on the top surface induced by targeted traction and their computed counterparts induced by estimated traction is minimized. To mitigate the solution multiplicity of the presented inverse problem, we employ the Tikhonov (TN) regularization on the estimated traction function. We present the mathematical modeling and numerical implementation of both optimize-then-discretize (OTD) and discretize-then-optimize (DTO) approaches. The finite-element method (FEM) is employed to obtain the numerical solutions of state and adjoint problems. Newton’s method is utilized for estimating an optimal step length in combination with the conjugate-gradient scheme, calculating a desired search direction, throughout a minimization process. Numerical results present that the complexity of a material profile in a domain increases the error between reconstructed traction and its target. Second, the OTD and DTO approaches lead to the same inversion result. Third, when the sampling rate of the measurement is equal to the time step for discretizing estimated traction, the ratio of the size of measurement data to the number of the control parameters can be as small as 112 in the presented work. Fourth, it is acceptable to tackle the presented inverse modeling of dynamic traction without the TN regularization. Fifth, the inversion performance is more compromised when the noise of a larger level is added to the measurement data, and using the TN regularization does not improve the inversion performance when noise is added to the measurement. Sixth, our minimizer suffers from solution multiplicity less when it identifies dynamic traction of lower frequency content than that of higher frequency content. The wave responses in a computational domain, induced by targeted traction and its reconstructed one, are in excellent agreement with each other. Thus, if the presented dynamic-input inversion algorithm is extended in realistic 3D settings, it could reconstruct seismic-input motions in a truncated domain and, then, replay the wave responses in a computational domain.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
MATLAB code (.m format) of the presented inverse modeling that contains the optimization solver and the forward and adjoint wave solvers.
MATLAB datasets (.mat format) of the presented numerical results (Cases 1–18).

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. CMMI-1855406. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Akcelik, V., G. Biros, and O. Ghattas. 2002. “Parallel multiscale Gauss-Newton-Krylov methods for inverse wave propagation.” In Proc., Supercomputing, ACM/IEEE 2002 Conf., 41–41. New York: IEEE.
Aquino, W., G. Bunting, S. T. Miller, and T. F. Walsh. 2019. “A gradient-based optimization approach for the detection of partially connected surfaces using vibration tests.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 345 (Mar): 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.002.
Bielak, J., and P. Christiano. 1984. “On the effective seismic input for non-linear soil-structure interaction systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 12 (1): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290120108.
Bielak, J., K. Loukakis, Y. Hisada, and C. Yoshimura. 2003. “Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, Part I: Theory.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (2): 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010251.
Binder, F., F. Schöpfer, and T. Schuster. 2015. “Defect localization in fibre-reinforced composites by computing external volume forces from surface sensor measurements.” Inverse Prob. 31 (2): 025006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/31/2/025006.
Fathi, A., L. F. Kallivokas, and B. Poursartip. 2015a. “Full-waveform inversion in three-dimensional PML-truncated elastic media.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 296 (Nov): 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.07.008.
Fathi, A., B. Poursartip, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2015b. “Time-domain hybrid formulations for wave simulations in three-dimensional PML-truncated heterogeneous media.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 101 (3): 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4780.
Fathi, A., B. Poursartip, K. Stokoe, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2016. “Three-dimensional P- and S-wave velocity profiling of geotechnical sites using full-waveform inversion driven by field data.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 87 (Aug): 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.010.
Fletcher, R., and C. M. Reeves. 1951. “Function minimization by conjugate gradients.” Comput. J. 7 (2): 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.2.149.
Goh, H., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2019. “Group velocity-driven inverse metamaterial design.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (12): 04019094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001688.
Guzina, B. B., S. N. Fata, and M. Bonnet. 2003. “On the stress-wave imaging of cavities in a semi-infinite solid.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 (6): 1505–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00650-9.
Hasanov, A., and O. Baysal. 2014. “Identification of an unknown spatial load distribution in a vibrating cantilevered beam from final overdetermination.” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 23 (1): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/jiip-2014-0010.
Jeong, C., L. Kallivokas, S. Kucukcoban, W. Deng, and A. Fathi. 2015. “Maximization of wave motion within a hydrocarbon reservoir for wave-based enhanced oil recovery.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 129 (May): 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.03.009.
Jeong, C., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2016. “An inverse-source problem for maximization of pore-fluid oscillation within poroelastic formations.” Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 25 (6): 832–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2016.1201663.
Jeong, C., L. F. Kallivokas, C. Huh, and L. W. Lake. 2010. “Optimization of sources for focusing wave energy in targeted formations.” J. Geophys. Eng. 7 (3): 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/7/3/003.
Jeong, C., S. W. Na, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2009. “Near-surface localization and shape identification of a scatterer embedded in a halfplane using scalar waves.” J. Comput. Acoust. 17 (3): 277–308. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X09003963.
Jeong, C., and E. E. Seylabi. 2018. “Seismic input motion identification in a heterogeneous halfspace.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (8): 04018070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001495.
Jeremić, B., N. Tafazzoli, T. Ancheta, N. Orbović, and A. Blahoianu. 2013. “Seismic behavior of NPP structures subjected to realistic 3D, inclined seismic motions, in variable layered soil/rock, on surface or embedded foundations.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 265 (Dec): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.003.
Jung, J., C. Jeong, and E. Taciroglu. 2013. “Identification of a scatterer embedded in elastic heterogeneous media using dynamic XFEM.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 259 (Jun): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.001.
Kallivokas, L. F., A. Fathi, S. Kucukcoban, K. H. Stokoe, J. Bielak, and O. Ghattas. 2013. “Site characterization using full waveform inversion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 47 (Apr): 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.012.
Kang, J. W., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2010a. “The inverse medium problem in 1D PML-truncated heterogeneous semi-infinite domains.” Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 18 (6): 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2010.492510.
Kang, J. W., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2010b. “Mixed unsplit-field perfectly matched layers for transient simulations of scalar waves in heterogeneous domains.” Comput. Geosci. 14 (4): 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-009-9176-4.
Kang, J. W., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2011. “The inverse medium problem in heterogeneous PML-truncated domains using scalar probing waves.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (1): 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.08.010.
Karve, P. M., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2015. “Wave energy focusing to subsurface poroelastic formations to promote oil mobilization.” Geophys. J. Int. 202 (1): 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv133.
Karve, P. M., L. F. Kallivokas, and L. Manuel. 2016. “A framework for assessing the uncertainty in wave energy delivery to targeted subsurface formations.” J. Appl. Geophys. 125 (Feb): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.12.001.
Karve, P. M., S. Kucukcoban, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2015. “On an inverse source problem for enhanced oil recovery by wave motion maximization in reservoirs.” Comput. Geosci. 19 (1): 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9462-7.
Kucukcoban, S., H. Goh, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2019. “On the full-waveform inversion of lame parameters in semi-infinite solids in plane strain.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 164 (Jun): 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.019.
Kucukcoban, S., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2011. “Mixed perfectly-matched-layers for direct transient analysis in 2D elastic heterogeneous media.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (1–4): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.013.
Kucukcoban, S., and L. F. Kallivokas. 2013. “A symmetric hybrid formulation for transient wave simulations in PML-truncated heterogeneous media.” Wave Motion 50 (1): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.06.004.
Lions, J. 1971. Optimal control of systems governed by partial differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
Lloyd, F., and C. Jeong. 2018. “Adjoint equation-based inverse-source modeling to reconstruct moving acoustic sources in a 1D heterogeneous solid.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (9): 04018089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001508.
Lysmer, J., and R. L. Kuhlemeyer. 1969. “Finite dynamic model for infinite media.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 95 (4): 859–877.
Mashayekh, H., L. F. Kallivokas, and J. L. Tassoulas. 2018. “Parameter estimation in layered media using dispersion-constrained inversion.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (11): 04018099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001527.
Mejia, L., and E. Dawson. 2006. “Earthquake deconvolution for FLAC.” In Proc., 4th Int. FLAC Symp. on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, edited by P. Varona and R. Hart. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group.
Nguyen-Tuan, L., S. S. Nanthakumar, and T. Lahmer. 2019. “Identification of multiple flaws in dams using inverse analysis based on hydro-mechanical XFEM and level sets.” Comput. Geotech. 110 (Jun): 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.02.006.
Pakravan, A., J. W. Kang, and C. M. Newtson. 2016. “A Gauss-Newton full-waveform inversion for material profile reconstruction in viscoelastic semi-infinite solid media.” Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 24 (3): 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2015.1046861.
Paolucci, R., and K. Pitilakis. 2007. Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations, 433–459. Berlin: Springer.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research). 2000. “Pacific earthquake engineering research center (PEER) ground motion database.” Accessed April 14, 2015. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site.
Petryk, H., and Z. Mroz. 1986. “Time derivatives of integrals and functionals defined on varying volume and surface domains.” Arch. Mech. 38 (5–6): 697–724.
Poul, M. K., and A. Zerva. 2018a. “Efficient time-domain deconvolution of seismic ground motions using the equivalent-linear method for soil-structure interaction analyses.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 112 (Sep): 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.032.
Poul, M. K., and A. Zerva. 2018b. “Nonlinear dynamic response of concrete gravity dams considering the deconvolution process.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 109 (Jun): 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.025.
Poul, M. K., and A. Zerva. 2018c. “Time-domain PML formulation for modeling viscoelastic waves with Rayleigh-type damping in an unbounded domain: Theory and application in ABAQUS.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 152 (Dec): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2018.08.004.
Poursartip, B., A. Fathi, and L. F. Kallivokas. 2017. “Seismic wave amplification by topographic features: A parametric study.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.031.
Rahnema, H., S. Mohasseb, and B. JavidSharifi. 2016. “2-D soil-structure interaction in time domain by the SBFEM and two non-linear soil models.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 88 (Sep): 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.008.
Schnabel, P. B. 1972. Shake a computer program for earthquake response analysisi of horizontally layered sites. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Tadi, M., H. Rabitz, K. Y. Sik, A. Askar, J. H. Prevost, and J. B. McManus. 1996. “Interior energy focusing within an elasto-plastic material.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 33 (13): 1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00137-9.
Tran, K. T., and M. McVay. 2012. “Site characterization using Gauss-Newton inversion of 2-D full seismic waveform in the time domain.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 43 (Dec): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.07.004.
Tripe, R., S. Kontoe, and T. K. C. Wong. 2013. “Slope topography effects on ground motion in the presence of deep soil layers.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 50 (Jul): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.02.011.
Tromp, J., D. Komattisch, and Q. Liu. 2008. “Spectral-element and adjoint methods in seismology.” Commun. Comput. Phys. 3 (1): 1–32.
Walsh, T., W. Aquino, and M. Ross. 2013. Source identification in acoustics and structural mechanics using SIERRA/SD. Livermore, CA: Sandia National Laboratories.
Zhang, W., E. E. Seylabi, and E. Taciroglu. 2019. “An ABAQUS toolbox for soil-structure interaction analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 114 (Oct): 103143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103143.
Zhu, H., D. Komatitsch, and J. Tromp. 2017. “Radial anisotropy of the North American upper mantle based on adjoint tomography with USArray.” Geophys. J. Int. 211 (1): 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx305.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Aug 5, 2019
Accepted: Nov 29, 2020
Published online: Jan 29, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 29, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan Univ., Mount Pleasant, MI 48859. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-8806
Assistant Professor, School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan Univ., Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-8559. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share