Technical Papers
Jul 9, 2019

Efficient Woodbury-CA Hybrid Method for Structures with Material and Geometric Nonlinearities

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 145, Issue 9

Abstract

Nonlinearity problems in engineering structures primarily involve material nonlinearity and geometric nonlinearity. Significant effort has gone toward developing accurate and efficient models and methods to simulate these nonlinear behaviors of structures. Although advanced hardware technology has greatly enhanced the computational performance of nonlinear analyses, many researchers still pay extra attention to developing more efficient numerical solution methods with the emergence of complex large-scale structures. The inelasticity-separated finite element method (IS FEM), as an efficient algorithm, is suitable for solving local material nonlinearity problems by keeping the global stiffness matrix unchanged throughout the whole computational process such that the Woodbury formula can be used as an effective tool. However, this procedure does not obviously improve the computational efficiency for structures with large deformation because widely distributed geometric nonlinearity commonly occurs throughout entire structures rather than in local domains. Furthermore, the global stiffness matrix, which is equal to the sum of the initial stiffness matrix and geometric stiffness matrix, changes in real time. This study proposes an efficient Woodbury-CA hybrid (WCH) method by incorporating the combined approximations (CA) method into the framework of the IS FEM to obtain the response of engineering structures with hybrid nonlinear behaviors (both material and geometric nonlinearities) under external loads. Within this framework, the solution of linear equations in the Woodbury formula, which is related only to the geometric nonlinear behaviors of structures, can be obtained by employing the CA method; two other global stiffness matrices, which are used to formulate the Schur complement matrices, are approximated as constant matrices for small periods of time. Additional error induced by these approximations can be eliminated by updating the global stiffness matrix when the optimal adaptive criterion (AC) used for evaluating the difference between the exact solution and approximate solution is not satisfied. Additionally, the time complexity theory is used to evaluate the computational efficiency of the proposed method; the results show that the WCH method has outstanding advantages over the conventional finite element method (FEM). The proposed method is validated against the FEM results via two different numerical examples and has greater potential for solving local material and global geometric nonlinearity problems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the authors was provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD1100404) and Dalian High Level Talent Innovation Support Program (2017RD04). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged here.

References

Aho, A. V., J. E. Hopcroft, and J. D. Ullman. 2003. Data structures and algorithms. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Akgün, M. A., J. H. Garcelon, and R. T. Haftka. 2001. “Fast exact linear and non-linear structural reanalysis and the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formulas.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 50 (7): 1587–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.87.
Amir, O., U. Kirsch, and I. Sheinman. 2008. “Efficient non-linear reanalysis of skeletal structures using combined approximations.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 73 (9): 1328–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2128.
Barthelemy, J. F. M., and R. T. Haftka. 1993. “Approximation concepts for optimum structural design—A review.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 5 (3): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743349.
Bathe, K. J. 1996. Finite element procedures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bathe, K. J., and S. Ramaswamy. 1979. “On three-dimensional nonlinear analysis of concrete structures.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 52 (3): 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(79)90029-3.
Bathe, K. J., E. Ramm, and E. L. Wilson. 1975. “Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 9 (2): 353–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620090207.
Bazaraa, M. S., J. J. Jarvis, and H. D. Sherali. 2009. Linear programming and network flows. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.
Clough, R. W. 1960. “The finite element method in plane stress analysis.” In Proc., 2nd ASCE Conf. on Electronic Computation, 345–378. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Cormen, T. H., C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, C. Stein, M. London, M. B. Company, and B. B. Ridge. 2009. Introduction to algorithms. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gao, G., H. Wang, and G. Li. 2013. “An adaptive time-based global method for dynamic reanalysis.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48 (2): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0930-9.
Golub, G. H., and C. F. Van Loan. 2014. Matrix computations. 4th ed. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press.
Hager, W. W. 1989. “Updating the inverse of a matrix.” SIAM Rev. 31 (2): 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1137/1031049.
Holnicki-Szulc, J., and J. T. Gierlinski. 1989. “Structural modifications simulated by virtual distortions.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 28 (3): 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620280312.
Karkon, M., and M. Rezaiee-Pajand. 2016. “Geometrical nonlinear analysis of plane problems by corotational formulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (10): 04016073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001133.
Kirsch, U. 2000. “Combined approximations—A general reanalysis approach for structural optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 20 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050141.
Kirsch, U. 2003a. “A unified reanalysis approach for structural analysis, design, and optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 25 (2): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0269-0.
Kirsch, U. 2003b. “Design-oriented analysis of structures—Unified approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (3): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:3(264).
Kirsch, U. 2008. Reanalysis of structures: A unified approach for linear, nonlinear, static, and dynamic systems. New York: Springer.
Kirsch, U., and M. Bogomolni. 2004. “Error evaluation in approximate reanalysis of structures.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 28 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0434-8.
Kirsch, U., and M. Bogomolni. 2007. “Nonlinear and dynamic structural analysis using combined approximations.” Comput. Struct. 85 (10): 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.073.
Kirsch, U., M. Kocvara, and J. Zowe. 2002. “Accurate reanalysis of structures by a preconditioned conjugate gradient method.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 55 (2): 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.496.
Kirsch, U., and P. Y. Papalambros. 2001. “Exact and accurate solutions in the approximate reanalysis of structures.” AIAA J. 39 (11): 2198–2205. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1219.
Kulkarni, D. V., D. A. Tortorelli, and M. Wallin. 2007. “A Newton-Schur alternative to the consistent tangent approach in computational plasticity.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (7): 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.013.
Leu, L. J., and C. W. Huang. 1998. “A reduced basis method for geometric nonlinear analysis of structures.” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. 39 (2): 71–76.
Li, G., L. A. Fahnestock, and H. N. Li. 2013. “Simulation of steel brace hysteretic response using the force analogy method.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (4): 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000664.
Li, G., S. Jia, D. H. Yu, and H. N. Li. 2018. “Woodbury approximation method for structural nonlinear analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (7): 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001464.
Li, G., and K. K. F. Wong. 2014. Theory of nonlinear structural analysis: The force analogy method for earthquake engineering. New York: Wiley.
Li, G., and D. H. Yu. 2018. “Efficient inelasticity-separated finite-element method for material nonlinearity analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (4): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001426.
Li, G., D. H. Yu, and H. N. Li. 2018. “Seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete frames using inelasticity-separated fiber beam-column model.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (5): 1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3018.
Liang, X. Q., Q. Gao, and W. A. Yao. 2017. “An efficient algorithm based on group theory and the Woodbury formula for the dynamic responses of periodic structures.” Comput. Struct. 182: 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.12.002.
Nanakorn, P., and L. N. Vu. 2006. “A 2D field-consistent beam element for large displacement analysis using the total Lagrangian formulation.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 42 (14): 1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2006.06.002.
Pai, P. F., T. J. Anderson, and E. A. Wheater. 2000. “Large-deformation tests and total-Lagrangian finite-element analyses of flexible beams.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 37 (21): 2951–2980. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00115-8.
Pica, A., R. D. Wood, and E. Hinton. 1980. “Finite element analysis of geometrically nonlinear plate behavior using a Mindlin formulation.” Comput. Struct. 11 (3): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(80)90160-1.
Schachter, M., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2011. “Dynamic analysis of three-dimensional frames with material and geometric nonlinearities.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (2): 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000298.
Simo, J. C., and T. Hughes. 1998. Computational inelasticity. New York: Springer.
Sun, R., D. Liu, T. Xu, H. Zhang, and W. Zuo. 2014. “New adaptive technique of Kirsch method for structural reanalysis.” AIAA J. 52 (3): 486–495. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051597.
Turkalj, G., J. Brnic, D. Lanc, and S. Kravanja. 2012. “Updated Lagrangian formulation for nonlinear stability analysis of thin-walled frames with semi-rigid connections.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 12 (03): 1250013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455412500137.
Wong, K. K. F., and R. Yang. 1999. “Inelastic dynamic response of structures using force analogy method.” J. Eng. Mech. 125 (10): 1190–1199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:10(1190).
Yang, Y. B., S. P. Lin, and L. J. Leu. 2007. “Solution strategy and rigid element for nonlinear analysis of elastically structures based on updated Lagrangian formulation.” Eng. Struct. 29 (6): 1189–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.015.
Yang, Y. B., and W. McGuire. 1986. “Joint rotation and geometric nonlinear analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (4): 879–905. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:4(879).
Yu, D. H., G. Li, and H. N. Li. 2018. “Improved Woodbury solution method for nonlinear analysis with high-rank modifications based on a sparse approximation approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (11): 04018103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001530.
Zeoli, M., F. van Keulen, and M. Langelaar. 2005. “Fast reanalysis of geometrically nonlinear problems after shape modifications.” In Proc., 6th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Berlin: Springer.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu. 2005. The finite element method: Its basis and fundamentals. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Jul 2, 2018
Accepted: Feb 11, 2019
Published online: Jul 9, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 9, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gang Li, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Yong-Qiang Jin [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Ding-Hao Yu [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Hong-Nan Li, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu Univ., Shenyang, Liaoning 110168, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share