Technical Papers
Jul 20, 2015

Real-Time Hybrid Simulation with Online Model Updating: Methodology and Implementation

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 142, Issue 2

Abstract

Hybrid simulations have shown great potential for economic and reliable assessment of structural seismic performance by combining physical experimentation on part of the structural system and numerical simulation of the remaining structural components. Current hybrid simulation practices often use a fixed numerical model without considering the possible availability of a more-accurate model obtained during hybrid simulation through an online model updating technique. To address this limitation and improve the reliability of numerical models in hybrid simulations, this paper presents a method and an implementation procedure of conducting real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) with online model updating. The Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) was adopted as the parameter identification algorithm applied to the Bouc-Wen model that defines the hysteresis of the experimental substructure. The identified parameters are then used to update the models of the numerical substructures during RTHS. A parametric study of the UKF system model parameters is carried out first to determine the optimum values to be used in the verification experiments. Then RTHS of a three-story steel shear building model is conducted and the effectiveness of online model updating in RTHS and the proposed implementation procedure is demonstrated. Guidelines for implementing the UKF for online model updating in RTHS and research needs for further development are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CMMI 1135005. The authors acknowledge the financial support.

References

Ahmadizadeh, M., Mosqueda, G., and Reinhorn, A. (2008). “Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(1), 21–42.
Bouc, R. (1967). “Forced vibration of a mechanical system with hysteresis.” Proc., 4th Conf. on Nonlinear Oscillation, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 315.
Chatzi, E., and Smyth, A. (2008). “The unscented Kalman Filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing.” J. Struct. Control Health Monitor., 16(1), 99–123.
Chen, C., and Ricles, J. (2009). “Improving the inverse compensation method for real-time hybrid simulation through a dual compensation scheme.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(10), 1237–1255.
Dorka, U., and Heiland, D. (1991). “Fast online earthquake simulation using a novel PC supported measurement and control concept.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamics, Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Southampton, U.K., 636–645.
Elanwar, H., and Elnashai, A. (2014). “On-line model updating in hybrid simulation tests.” J. Earthquake Eng., 18(3), 350–363.
Hashemi, J., Masroor, A., and Mosqueda, G. (2013). “Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(3), 395–412.
Ismail, M., Ikhouane, F., and Rodellar, J. (2009). “The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 16(2), 161–188.
Kolas, S., Foss, B., and Schei, T. (2009). “Constrained nonlinear state estimation based on the UKF approach.” Comput. Chem. Eng., 33(8), 1386–1401.
Kwon, O., and Kammula, V. (2013). “Model updating method for substructure pseudo-dynamic hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(13), 1971–1984.
Ma, F., Bockstedte, A., Foliente, G., Paevere, P., and Zhang, H. (2004). “Parameter analysis of the differential model of hysteresis.” J. Appl. Mech., 71(3), 342–349.
Mandela, R., Kuppuraj, V., Rengaswamy, R., and Narasimhan, S. (2012). “Constrained unscented recursive estimator for nonlinear dynamic systems.” J. Process Control, 22(4), 718–728.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Mercan, O., and Ricles, J. (2007). “Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(11), 1523–1543.
National Instruments. (2014). “Getting started with NI Veristand.” 〈http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14126/en/〉 (Sep. 24, 2014).
Shao, X., et al. (2014). “Real-time hybrid simulation of a multi-story wood shear wall with first-story experimental substructure incorporating a rate-dependent seismic energy dissipation device.” Smart Struct. Syst., 14(6), 1031–1054.
Shao, X., and Enyart, G. (2012). “Development of a versatile hybrid testing system for seismic experimentation.” Exp. Tech., 38(6), 44–60.
Shao, X., and Griffith, C. (2013). “An overview of hybrid simulation applications in NEESR projects.” Eng. Struct., 56, 1439–1451.
Shao, X., Reinhorn, A., and Sivaselvan, M. (2011). “Real-time hybrid simulation using shake tables and dynamic actuators.” J. Struct. Eng., 748–760.
Shing, P., and Vannan, M. (1991). “Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests: Convergence and energy dissipation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 20(9), 809–819.
Shing, P., Vannan, M., and Cater, E. (1991). “Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 20(6), 551–576.
Song, W., and Dyke, S. (2014). “Real-time dynamic model updating of a hysteretic structural system.” J. Struct. Eng., 04013082.
Wallace, M., Sieber, J., Neild, S., Wagg, D., and Krauskopf, B. (2005). “Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equation models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(15), 1817–1832.
Wang, T., and Wu, B. (2013). “Real-time hybrid testing with constrained unscented Kalman filter.” 5th Int. Conf. on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, International Association for Experimental Structural Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen, Y. (1976). “Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems.” J. Eng. Mech., 102(2), 249–263.
Wu, B., Bao, H., Ou, J., and Tian, S. (2005). “Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real-time substructure testing.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(7), 705–718.
Yang, Y., Tsai, K., Elnashai, A., and Hsieh, T. (2012). “An online optimization method for bridge dynamic hybrid simulations.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory, 28, 42–54.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 142Issue 2February 2016

History

Received: Nov 12, 2014
Accepted: Jun 11, 2015
Published online: Jul 20, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 20, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaoyun Shao, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5316 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Adam Mueller
Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, 2550 University Ave. W, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5316.
Bilal Ahmed Mohammed
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5316.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share