Technical Papers
May 22, 2014

Modeling of Flexural Behavior and Punching Shear of Concrete Bridge Decks with FRP Stay-in-Place Forms Using the Theory of Plates

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 140, Issue 12

Abstract

A robust analytical model for predicting full response and ultimate load of concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) stay-in-place (SIP) structural forms is presented. It adopts the plate theory to establish surface deflections, while incorporating concrete nonlinearity in compression and cracking in tension, as well as the degree of bond between the FRP SIP form and the concrete. The model accounts for various boundary conditions at the edges of the deck in both directions, including both finite and infinite width in the direction of traffic, and either fixed or hinged conditions in the other direction, depending on the connection to the support girders. A punching shear failure criterion was incorporated to predict the ultimate load. The model was validated against a large experimental database, and reasonable agreement was observed. The average percent difference in ultimate loads was 5.5%. The model was then used in a parametric study to assess the FRP reinforcement ratio in terms of the FRP plate thickness, the width of the deck parallel to traffic, and the span of the deck, which is the girder spacing. It was shown that reducing the FRP reinforcement ratio from 10.7 to 2.7% results in about a 20% reduction in punching shear ultimate load. The ultimate loads obtained for decks with (width/span) aspect ratios of 2.73, 1.33, 0.87, and 0.55 were 100, 94, 83, and 73%, respectively, of the ultimate load of the real condition of infinite width. Finally, the punching shear load decreased by about 18% as the deck span-to-depth ratio increased from 10 to 16.5.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, SI units, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Alagusundaramoorthy, P., Harik, I. E., and Choo, C. C. (2006). “Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng., 384–393.
Batchelor, B., Hewitt, B., Csagoly, P., and Holowka, M. (1978). “Investigation of the ultimate strength of deck slabs of composite steel/concrete bridges.” Transportation Research Record 664, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 162–170.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004). “Design of concrete structures.” A23.3-04, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” S6-06, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Collins, M., and Mitchell, D. (1997). Prestressed concrete structures, Response Publications, Toronto.
Dieter, D. A. (2002). “Experimental and analytical study of concrete bridge decks constructed with FRP stay-in-place forms and FRP grid reinforcing.” M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Fam, A., and Nelson, M. (2012). “New bridge deck cast onto corrugated GFRP stay-in-place structural forms with interlocking connections.” J. Compos. Constr., 16(1), 110–117.
Honickman, H. (2008). “Pultruded GFRP sections as stay-in-place structural open formwork for concrete slabs and girders.” M.Sc. thesis, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Kinnunen, S., and Nylander, H. (1960). Punching of concrete slabs without shear reinforcement, Vol. 158, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Mufti, A., and Newhook, J. (1998). “Punching shear strength of restrained concrete bridge deck slabs.” ACI Struct. J., 95(4), 375–381.
Muttoni, A. (2003). “Shear and punching strength of slabs without shear reinforcement.” Beton- Stahlbetonbau, 98(2), 74–84 (in German).
Muttoni, A. (2008). “Punching shear strength of reinforced concrete slabs without transverse reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J., 105(4), 440–450.
Nelson, M., Beriker, E., and Fam, A. (2014). “Splices of FRP stay-in-place structural forms in concrete bridge decks.” J. Compos. Constr., 04014001.
Nelson, M., Eldridge, A., and Fam, A. (2013). “The effects of splices and bond on performance of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place forms at various boundary conditions.” Eng. Struct., 56(Nov), 509–516.
Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2013). “Structural GFRP permanent forms with T-shape ribs for bridge decks supported by precast concrete girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 813–826.
Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2014). “Full bridge testing at scale constructed with novel FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete deck.” Constr. Build. Mater., 50(15), 368–376.
Patrick, M. (1994). “Partial shear connection design of composite slabs.” Eng. Struct., 16(5), 348–362.
Timoshenko, S., and Woinowsky-Krieger, S. (1959). Theory of plates and shells, McGraw Hill, New York.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1986). “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J., 83(Mar), 219–231.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 140Issue 12December 2014

History

Received: Jul 9, 2013
Accepted: Apr 24, 2014
Published online: May 22, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2014
Published in print: Dec 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mark Nelson, S.M.ASCE
Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.
Amir Fam, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Innovative and Retrofitted Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share