TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 15, 2011

Model Uncertainty in Finite-Element Analysis: Bayesian Finite Elements

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 137, Issue 8

Abstract

In this paper, probabilistic models for structural analysis are put forward, with particular emphasis on model uncertainty. Context is provided by the finite-element method and the need for probabilistic prediction of structural performance in contemporary engineering. Sources of model uncertainty are identified and modeled. A Bayesian approach is suggested for the assessment of new model parameters within the element formulations. The expressions are formulated by means of numerical “sensors” that influence the model uncertainty, such as element distortion and degree of nonlinearity. An assessment procedure is proposed to identify the sensors that are most suitable to capture model uncertainty. This paper presents the general methodology and specific implementations for a general-purpose structural element. Two numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the methodology and its implications for probabilistic prediction of structural response.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adams, J., and Atkinson, G. (2003). “Development of seismic hazard maps for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 30(2), 255–271.
Apostolakis, G. E. (1990). “Uncertainty and expert opinions in probabilistic safety assessment.” Forensic Eng., 2(1–2), 271–272.
Beck, J. L., and Yuen, K. (2004). “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech., 130(2), 192–203.
Blackmond, Laskey K. (1996). “Model uncertainty: theory and practical implications.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans, 26(3), 340–348.
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). “An analysis of transformations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26(2), 211–252.
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Bozorgnia, Y., and Bertero, V. V. (2004). CRC handbook: Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Bradley, B. A., Lee, D. S., Broughton, R., and Price, C. (2009). “Efficient evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering equations.” Struct. Saf., 31(1), 65–74.
Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News, (3)2.
Der Kiureghian, A. (1989). “Measures of structural safety under imperfect states of knowledge.” J. Struct. Eng., 115(5), 1119–1140.
Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). “Non-ergodicity and PEER’s framework formula.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(13), 1643–1652.
Der Kiureghian, A., and Ditlevsen, O. (2009). “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?.” Struct. Saf., 31(2), 105–112.
Der Kiureghian, A., and Taylor, R. L. (1983). “Numerical methods in structural reliability.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, G. Augusti, A. Borri, and G. Vannucchi, eds., Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, Italy, 769–784.
Devooght, J. (1998). “Model uncertainty and model inaccuracy.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 59(2), 171–185.
Ditlevsen, O. (1982). “Model uncertainty in structural reliability.” Struct. Saf., 1, 73–86.
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O. (2007). “Structural reliability methods.” 〈http://www.web.mek.dtu.dk/staff/od/books.htm〉 (Mar. 1, 2009).
Draper, D. (1995). “Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57(1), 45–97.
Droguett, E. L., and Mosleh, A. (2008). “Bayesian methodology for model uncertainty using model performance data.” Risk Anal., 28(5), 1457–1476.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2001). “Earthquake risk assessment of building structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74(3), 251–262.
Faber, M. H. (2005). “On the treatment of uncertainties and probabilities in engineering decision analysis.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 127(3), 243–248.
Frier, C., and Sorensen, J. D. (2007). “Finite element reliability analysis of chloride ingress into reinforced concrete structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 3(4), 355–366.
Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2002). “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech., 128(10), 1024–1038.
Gardoni, P., Mosalam, K. M., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). “Probabilistic seismic demand models for fragility estimates for RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng., 7(Special Issue), 79–106.
Ghanem, R. G., and Spanos, P. D. (1991). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Gutierrez, M. A., Carmeliet, J., and De Borst, R. (1994). Finite element reliability using DIANA, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 255–264.
Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Haukaas, T. (2008). “Unified reliability and design optimization for earthquake engineering.” Prob. Eng. Mech., 23(4), 471–481.
Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2007). “Methods and object-oriented software for FE reliability and sensitivity analysis with application to a bridge structure.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 21(3), 151–163.
Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS). (2008). “Risk assessment in engineering principles: System representation and risk criteria.” 〈http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/publications/publications.html〉 (Mar. 1, 2009).
Kiureghian, A. D., and Zhang, Y. (1999). “Space-variant finite element reliability analysis.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 168(1–4), 173–183.
Lebrun, R., and Dutfoy, A. (2009). “An innovating analysis of the Nataf transformation from the copula viewpoint.” Prob. Eng. Mech., 24(3), 312–320.
Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G., and Baker, J. W. (2009). “Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings.” Struct. Saf., 31(2), 197–211.
Liu, P., and Der Kiureghian, A. (1986). “Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances.” Prob. Eng. Mech., 1(2), 105–112.
Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2006). “Fourway: Graphical tool for performance-based earthquake engineering.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(8), 1274–1283.
Oberkampf, W. L., DeLand, S. M., Rutherford, B. M., Diegert, K. V., and Alvin, K. F. (2002). “Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 75(3), 333–357.
Porter, K. A. (2003). “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability (ICASP9) in Civil Engineering, A. Der Kiureghian, S. Madanat, and J. Pestana, eds., Millpress Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 973–980.
Reinert, J. M., and Apostolakis, G. E. (2006). “Including model uncertainty in risk-informed decision making.” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 33(4), 354–369.
Rezaeian, S., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2008). “A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(13), 1565–1584.
Roache, P. J. (1998). Verification and validation in computational science and engineering, Hermosa, Albuquerque, NM.
Sudret, B., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2002). “Comparison of finite element reliability methods.” Prob. Eng. Mech., 17(4), 337–348.
Takahashi, Y., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). “Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(3), 267–291.
Vick, S. G. (2002). Degrees of belief: Subjective probability and engineering judgment, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Yang, T. Y., Moehle, J. P., Stojadinovic, B., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2009). “Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation.” J. Struct. Eng., 135(10), 1146–1154.
Zio, E., Apostolakis, G. E., and Okrent, D. (1995). On the use of expert opinion in the assessment of model uncertainty, part 1, ASME, New York, 739–742.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 137Issue 8August 2011
Pages: 519 - 526

History

Received: Mar 27, 2009
Accepted: Feb 8, 2011
Published online: Jul 15, 2011
Published in print: Aug 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

T. Haukaas, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
P. Gardoni, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share