Successful Civil Engineering Education
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 136, Issue 1
![First page of PDF](/cms/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.12/asset/8925a794-d9ee-4206-94ad-e3937f8fd204/assets/(asce)ei.1943-5541.12.fp.png)
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to gratefully acknowledge useful comments and suggestions received from Dr. Kim Roddis, professor and chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, George Washington University; and from Dr. Jeffrey Russell, professor and chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Also, we would like to thank Dr. Stuart G. Walesh, editor of the ASCE Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, Second Edition, for his thorough analysis of our paper and for his meaningful comments, which have been at least partially addressed. In particular, his suggestion to discuss the roles of a problem definer and an opportunity finder greatly enhanced our discussion of leadership and creativity.
References
Akay, A. (2003). “The renaissance engineer: Educating engineers in a post- world.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 28(2), 145–150.
Anderson, L., et al. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy, Addison Wesley Longman, New York.
Arciszewski, T. (2006). “Civil engineering crisis.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 6(1), 26–30.
ASCE. (2004). Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future, ASCE, Reston, Va.
ASCE. (2008). Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future, 2nd Ed., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. (1956). “Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals.” Handbook I: Cognitive domain, D. McKay, ed., New York.
Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (2002). “The inheritance of inequality.” J. Econ. Perspect., 16(3), 3–30.
Clarke, D. (1997). TRIZ: Through the eyes of an American TRIZ specialist, Applied Innovation Alliance, LLC, West Bloomfield, Mo.
Clarke, D. (2000). “Strategically evolving the future: Directed evolution and technological systems development.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 64(2&3), 133–154.
Dietrich, A. (2004). “The cognitive neuroscience of creativity.” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 11(6), 1011–1026.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., and Kelly, D. R. (2007). “Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 92(6), 1087–1101.
Duderstadt, J. J. (2008). Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education, The Millennium Project, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Galloway, P. D. (2008). The 21st century engineer: A proposal for engineering education reform, ASCE, Reston, Va.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Neisser, U., et al. (1996). “Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns.” Am. Psychol., 51(2), 77–101.
Russell, J. S., Galloway, G. E., Lenox, T. A., and O’Brien, J. J. (2007). “ASCE Policy 465: The means for realizing the aspirational visions of civil engineering in 2025.” Proc., 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (CD-ROM).
Seely, B. E. (2005). Patterns in the history of engineering education reform. Appendix A of educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Sierra-Fitzgerald, O., and Quevedo-Caicedo, J. (2001). “The theory of multiple intelligences: A suitable neurocognitive context for the neuropsychological hypotheses on the factors and mechanisms of superiority.” Rev. Neurol., 33(11), 1060–1064 (in Spanish).
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of intelligence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence, Simon & Shuster, New York.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Thinking styles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). “A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice.” Handbook of gifted education, N. Coleangelo and G. A. Davis, eds., Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 43–53.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., and Singer, J. L., eds. (2004). Creativity, from potential to realization, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Sternberg, R. J., and Williams, W. M. (1997). “Does the graduate record examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study.” Am. Psychol., 52(6), 630–641.
Taub, G. E., Hayes, B. G., Cunningham, W. R., and Sivo, S. A. (2001). “Relative roles of cognitive ability and practical intelligence in the prediction of success.” Psychol. Rep., 88(3), 931–942.
Terninko, J., Zusman, A., and Zlotin, B. (1998). Systematic innovation: An introduction to TRIZ, St. Lucie Press.
Ulsoy, A. G., ed. (2007). “5XME Workshop: Transforming mechanical engineering education and research in the USA.” Workshop Report, National Science Foundation, Arlington, Va.
Wagner, J. (2007). Engineering and the liberal arts: More in common than you’d think, John Hopkins Engineering, Baltimore
Walesh, S. (2000). Managing and leading: 52 lessons learned for engineers, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 6, 2008
Accepted: Nov 28, 2008
Published online: Dec 15, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.