Development of Dynamic Laboratory Platform for Earthquake Engineering Courses
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 4
Abstract
Small-scale shaking table platforms are usually used in seismic engineering courses to study the structural dynamic behavior of small scale specimens and investigate innovative solutions, such as active and passive control systems. Furthermore, they are also useful to actively involve students in learning programs in higher education. This paper illustrates the development and the teaching effectiveness of a multimodular unidirectional platform to be used by students during dynamic and seismic courses within the Shaking Table Educational Program at the Politecnico di Torino. A unique feature of this platform is that the system was entirely developed by undergraduate students. The project was intended to create a shaking table for earthquake simulation that can measure the structural response using sensors located on a specimen, such as a building, a bridge, or any other type of reduced-scale system. Different types of dynamic tests can be reproduced, such as hybrid simulations and pseudodynamic tests. A survey demonstrates the effectiveness of the laboratory experience during seismic engineering courses to improve student learning capabilities through a teaching activity that involves both theoretical and hands-on experience. Currently, the platform has been extended to accommodate bidirectional shaking table tests with the inclusion of augmented reality tools that allow exploring the response of human behavior during a pedestrian evacuation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the Grant Agreement Number 637842 of the project IDEAL RESCUE-Integrated Design and Control of Sustainable Communities during Emergencies.
References
Amaratunga, K., and R. Sudarshan. 2002. “A virtual laboratory for real-time monitoring of civil engineering infrastructure.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Education. Potomac, MD: International Network for Engineering Education and Research.
Anderson, L. W., D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Arduino, P., G. Miller, and A. Ogunrinde. 2001. “Live modeling of 1D wave propagation in layered soil media.” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 9 (4): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.10003.
Benavent-Climent, A. 2009. “Distance learning earthquake engineering through shaking table tests and online tools.” In Proc., 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Engineering Education, 30–33. Stevens Point, WI: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.
Berk, R. 2004. “Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness.” Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ. 17 (1): 48–62.
Bloom, B., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
Bonwell, C., and J. Eison. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.
Budhu, M. 2002. “Virtual laboratories for engineering education.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Education. Potomac, MD: International Network for Engineering Education and Research.
Cimellaro, G. P. 2013. “Correlation in spectral accelerations for earthquakes in Europe.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (4): 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2248.
Cimellaro, G. P., M. Domaneschi, and R. Boroschek. 2017. “Monitoring human emotions during earthquakes.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure 2017. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Univ. of Technology.
Cimellaro, G. P., T. Giovine, and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2014. “Bidirectional pushover analysis of irregular structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (9): 04014059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001032.
Cimellaro, G. P., and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2011. “Algorithm for design of controlled motion of adjacent structures.” J. Struct. Control Health Monit. 18 (2): 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.357.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct. 32 (11): 3639–3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008.
Cimellaro, G. P., C. Renschler, A. M. Reinhorn, and L. Arendt. 2016. “PEOPLES: A framework for evaluating resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-1541X.0001514.
Clark, D. R. 2004. “Bloom’s taxonomy of learning domains.” Accessed July 18, 2018. http://nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html.
Domaneschi, M. 2012. “Simulation of controlled hysteresis by the semi-active Bouc-Wen model.” Comput. Struct. 106–107: 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.05.008.
Domaneschi, M., L. Martinelli, and E. Po. 2015. “Control of wind buffeting vibrations in a suspension bridge by TMD: Hybridization and robustness issues.” Comput. Struct. 155: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.031.
Dyke, S. J., R. Christenson, Z. Jiang, X. Gao, and Z. Feinstein. 2007. “Tele-operation tools for bench-scale shake tables for instruction in earthquake engineering.” Seismol. Res. Lett. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78 (4): 460–463. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.4.460.
Dyke, S. J., R. E. Christenson, and S. Courter. 2010. “Tele-operation shake table experiments in earthquake engineering for undergraduate education.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Including Papers from the 4th Int. Tsunami Symp., 2125–2133. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Dyke, S. J., B. Nepote, J. M. Caicedo, S. M. Johnson, and E. A. Oware. 2000a. “Earthquake engineering education: A modern approach.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf., 2263–2271. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Dyke, S. J., K. Z. Truman, and P. L. Gould. 2000b. “Current directions in earthquake engineering education: The university consortium on instructional shake tables.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf., 1661–1669. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Elgamal, A., M. Fraser, and F. McMartin. 2005a. “On-line educational shake table experiments.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 131 (1): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:1(41).
Elgamal, A., M. Fraser, and D. Zonta. 2005b. “Webshaker: Live internet shake-table experiment for education and research.” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 13 (1): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20034.
Evans, J. R., and A. Mathur. 2005. “The value of online surveys.” Internet Res. 15 (2): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590360.
Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 111 (23): 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.” Am. J. Phys. 66 (1): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The power of feedback.” Rev. Educ. Res. 77 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Iskhakov, I., Y. Ribakov, and N. Davidovich. 2007. “Incorporating a shaking table into a basic course in earthquake-oriented structural engineering.” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ. 6 (2): 279.
Ismail, M. 2016. “Novel hexapod-based unidirectional testing and FEM analysis of the RNC isolator.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 23 (6): 894–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1817.
Kammouh, O., G. Dervishaj, and G. P. Cimellaro. 2018. “Quantitative framework to assess resilience and risk at the country level.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000940.
LinMot. 2015. LinMot installation guide. Spreitenbach, Switzerland: LinMot.
Moretti, S., A. C. Trozzo, V. Terzic, G. P. Cimellaro, and S. Mahin. 2014. “Utilizing base-isolation systems to increase earthquake resiliency of hospitals and school buildings.” Procedia Econ. Finance 18: 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01024-7.
Mosalam, K. M., M. A. Hube, S. M. Takhirov, and S. Günay. 2012. “Teaching innovation through hands-on-experience case studies combined with hybrid simulation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 139 (3): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000146.
Springer, L., M. Stanne, and S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis.” Rev. Educ. Res. 69 (1): 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021.
Turner, A. M., S. S. Courter, and S. Dyke. 2011. “Classroom implementation and assessment on student learning of innovative shake table laboratory instruction.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Vallero, A. 2018. “Disaster resilience simulation lab.” Accessed July 18, 2018. https://areeweb.polito.it/drsil/.
Wankat, P. C., and F. S. Oreovicz. 2015. Teaching engineering. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144 • Issue 4 • October 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 26, 2017
Accepted: May 29, 2018
Published online: Aug 13, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 13, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.