Comparison of EC and ABET Accreditation Criteria
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 3
Abstract
The Washington Accord is one of seven mutual recognition agreements managed by the International Engineering Alliance. Its signatories recognize the substantial equivalency of programs accredited by the signatory bodies, and they agree to make every reasonable effort to ensure that licensing boards in their respective countries recognize this. Despite 25 years of the Washington Accord, however, only a minority of U.S. state licensing boards acknowledge it in their statutes. This paper compares Engineering Council (EC) guidelines for accreditation with those of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). It concludes that there are substantial similarities in the EC and ABET accreditation criteria. This should encourage U.S. state licensing boards to acknowledge EC-accredited programs in their statutes explicitly if not through the Washington Accord. A number of key differences in EC and ABET accreditation criteria are also highlighted. Both the ABET and the EC accredit programs at various levels. This paper recommends that the International Engineering Alliance clarify the correspondence between the various levels of accredited programs of the Washington Accord signatories.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). (2016a). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.” ⟨http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2017-2018/⟩ (Dec. 29, 2016).
ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). (2016b). “Engineering: Washington Accord.” ⟨http://www.abet.org/global-presence/mutual-recognition-agreements/engineering-washington-accord/#inside⟩ (Dec. 29, 2016).
ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). (2016c). “Substantial equivalency.” ⟨http://www.abet.org/global-presence/substantial-equivalency-2/⟩ (Jan. 5, 2017).
Anwar, A. A., and Richards, D. J. (2015). “The Washington accord and U.S. licensing boards.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 04015001.
ASCE. (2017). “Policy statement 465—Academic prerequisites for licensure and professional practice.” ⟨http://www.asce.org/issues-and-advocacy/public-policy/policy-statement-465---academic-prerequisites-for-licensure-and-professional-practice⟩ (Sep. 9, 2017).
EC (Engineering Council). (2014). “The accreditation of higher education programmes, UK standard for professional engineering competence.” ⟨http://www.engc.org.uk/EngCDocuments/Internet/Website/Accreditation%20of%20Higher%20Education%20Programmes%20third%20edition%20(1).pdf⟩ (Sep. 27, 2017).
EC (Engineering Council). (2016). “Washington Accord.” ⟨http://www.engc.org.uk/international-activity/international-engineering-education-accords/washington-accord/⟩ (Dec. 28, 2016).
EC (Engineering Council). (2017). “International engineering education accords.” ⟨https://www.engc.org.uk/international-activity/international-engineering-education-accords/⟩ (Sep. 27, 2017).
IEA (International Engineering Alliance). (2014). “25 years Washington Accord.” ⟨http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf⟩ (Sep. 28, 2017).
IEA (International Engineering Alliance). (2017a). “Competence agreements.” ⟨http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Policy/Competence-Agreements-July2017-v1.4.pdf⟩ (Sep. 28, 2017).
IEA (International Engineering Alliance). (2017b) “International engineering alliance: Educational accords.” ⟨http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Policy/IEA%20Rules%20and%20Procedures%20(3%20June%20206).pdf⟩ (Sep. 28, 2017).
JBM (Joint Board of Moderators). (2016a). “Guidance on the JBM professional qualifications policy for academic staff.” ⟨http://jbm.org.uk/downloads.aspx⟩ (Jan. 8, 2017).
JBM (Joint Board of Moderators). (2016b). “Submission for accreditation for academic courses leading to engineering council registration.” ⟨http://jbm.org.uk/downloads.aspx⟩ (Jan. 6, 2017).
Lloyd-Roach, D. (2013). “Discussion ‘Is the USA set to dominate accreditation of engineering education and professional qualifications?’” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 166(2), 55–57.
Milligan, M. (2011). “Global economy requires a global view on accreditation.” Licensure Exch., 15(1), 10.
Prichard, J. (2013). “Discussion to ‘Is the USA set to dominate accreditation of engineering education and professional qualifications?’” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 166(2), 56.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144 • Issue 3 • July 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2017
Accepted: Oct 27, 2017
Published online: Mar 10, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.