Exploratory Study of Recruitment and Retention of Women in the Construction Industry
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 2
Abstract
The U.S. construction industry is facing a labor shortage. As the current workforce ages and demand for new workers rises, the cost of construction is expected to increase dramatically. Encouraging more women to pursue careers in construction-related fields could minimize the effect of this shortage. However, prior research shows that construction is an unattractive career path for women because of factors such as jobsite sanitation, poor work-life balance, and gender bias. With these factors unlikely to change rapidly, how can existing recruitment and retention procedures be improved to attract more women into construction-related careers? This exploratory study considers the demographics and motivating factors for women who are pursuing a career in the architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (AECO) industry. Based on survey questionnaire results from 163 women, cross-tabulation analyses were conducted and no significant association was found between women’s desire to remain in the industry and various factors, including marital status, source of initial interest in construction, mentoring experience, financial compensation, or participation in professional groups. However, women in the 18–24 and over 65 age groups were significantly more likely than those between the ages of 25 and 64 to express a desire to leave their construction careers. Respondents in executive and principal roles classified their communication style as dominant significantly more often than respondents in entry-, junior-, and senior-level roles. Additionally, respondents perceiving that women comprised between 21 and 50% of their company more frequently reported that those employers had programs for recruiting and retaining women when compared with respondents perceiving a lower or higher percentage. These findings provide some exploratory insight for educators and practitioners who seek to increase the proportion of women participating in the construction workforce.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bender, R., and Lange, S. (2001). “Adjusting for multiple testing—When and how?” J. Clin. Epidemiol., 54(4), 343–349.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). “Nontraditional (male-dominated) occupations, 2014 annual averages.” U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). “Employment projections—2014-24.”, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Women. (2006). “Nontraditional occupations for women in 2005.” ⟨http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/nontra2005.htm⟩ (Mar. 4, 2015).
Chaudhry, N., et al. (2014). “Women in construction: Still breaking ground.” National Women’s Law Center, Washington, DC.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Dabke, S., Salem, O., Genaidy, A., and Daraiseh, N. (2008). “Job satisfaction of women in construction trades.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 205–216.
Fisher, R. (1937). The design of experiments, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, U.K.
Heilman, M. E., and Eagly, A. H. (2008). “Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination.” Ind. Organ. Psychol., 1(4), 393–398.
Heilman, M. E., and Okimoto, T. G. (2007). “Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit.” J. Appl. Psychol., 92(1), 81–92.
Hoobler, J. M., Lemmon, G., and Wayne, S. J. (2011). “Women’s underrepresentation in upper management: New insights on a persistent problem.” Organ. Dyn., 40(3), 151–156.
Joint Economic Committee. (2016). “Gender pay inequality. Consequences for women, families and the economy.” ⟨http://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/0779dc2f-4a4e-4386-b847-9ae919735acc/gender-pay-inequality-us-congress-joint-economic-committee.pdf⟩ (Jun. 4, 2017).
Kruskal, W. (1958). “Ordinal measures of association.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 53(284), 814–861.
Malone, E. K., and Issa, R. R. A. (2013a). “Predictive models for work-life balance and organizational commitment of women in U.S. construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013064.
Malone, E. K., and Issa, R. R. A. (2013b). “Work-life balance and organizational commitment of women in the U.S. construction industry.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 87–98.
Menches, C., and Abraham, D. (2007). “Women in construction—Tapping the untapped resource to meet future demands.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 701–707.
Qualtrics [Computer software]. Qualtrics, Provo, UT.
Watts, J. H. (2009). “Leaders of men: Women ‘managing’ in construction.” Work Employment Soc., 23(3), 512–530.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144 • Issue 2 • April 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 9, 2017
Accepted: Sep 18, 2017
Published online: Jan 19, 2018
Published in print: Apr 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.