Forum
Feb 8, 2017

Student–Supervisor Relationship in the Process of Managing a Ph.D.: Engineering Perspective

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143, Issue 4

Abstract

Forum papers are thought-provoking opinion pieces or essays founded in fact, sometimes containing speculation, on a civil engineering topic of general interest and relevance to the readership of the journal. The views expressed in this Forum article do not necessarily reflect the views of ASCE or the Editorial Board of the journal.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author, Sreekumar Muthuswamy, would like to acknowledge the opportunity given by the European Master on Advanced Robotics (EMARO) program to continue teaching and research assignments at the University of Genova, Italy, as Visiting Professor for short durations in 2012 and 2014 with financial support. He also wishes to express sincere thanks and gratitude to Prof. Rezia Molfino, Prof. Renato Zaccaria, Dr. Matteo Zoppi, Dr. Valentia Resaz of the University of Genova and Prof. R. Gnanamoorthy (Director, IIITDM Kancheepuram, India) for their valuable guidance. This work is dedicated by the first author to the professors who taught the Research Methodology course to him in 2004 while pursuing Ph.D. at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras), Chennai, India.

References

Barley, S. (2010). “Keeping on the PhD path.” New Scientist, 208(2791), 48–51.
Brown, G., and Atkins, M. (2006). “Academic staff training in British universities: Results of a national survey.” Stud. Higher Educ., 11(1), 29–42.
Cassuto, L. (2013). “Ph.D. attrition: How much is too much?” ⟨http://www.chronicle.com/article/phd-attrition-how-much-is/140045/⟩ (Sep. 29, 2016).
CGS (Council of Graduate Schools). (2010). “Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policies and practices to promote student success.” ⟨http://www.phdcompletion.org/information/book4.asp⟩ (Oct. 5, 2016).
Coyne, E. (2010). “Managing your Ph.D. progression: Tips for staying on track.” Nurse Author Editor, 20(2), 1–5.
Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., and Spear, R. H. (1994). “Establishing effective Ph.D. supervision.” Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., and Quinn, R. E. (1995). “Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership.” Organ. Sci., 6(5), 524–540.
Doloriert, C., Sambrook, S., and Stewart, J. (2012). “Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD.” Eur. J. Training Dev., 36(7), 732–750.
FindAPh.D.com. (2016). “The Ph.D. journey: 7 stages of a successful doctorate.” ⟨https://www.findaphd.com/advice/doing/the-phd-journey.aspx⟩ (Oct. 5, 2016).
Gravani, M. N., Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Nokolaidou, G. N., and Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2007). “Professional learning: A fuzzy logic-based modelling approach.” Learn. Instr., 17(2), 235–252.
Gunnarsson, R., Jonasson, G., and Billhult, A. (2013). “The experience of disagreement between students and supervisors in Ph.D. education: A qualitative study.” BMC Medical Education 2013, 13(1), 134.
Halse, C. (2011). “Becoming a supervisor: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning.” Stud. Higher Educ., 36(5), 557–570.
Hasrati, M. (2005). “Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising Ph.D. students.” Stud. Higher Educ., 30(5), 557–570.
Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., and Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision.” Procedia–Soc. Behav. Sci., 90, 165–170.
James, R., and Baldwin, G. (1999). “Eleven practices of effective postgraduate supervisors.” Centre for the Study of Higher Education and the School of Graduate Studies, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jindal-Snape, D., and Ingram, R. (2013). “Understanding and supporting triple transitions of international doctoral students: ELT and SuReCom models.” J. Perspect. Appl. Acad. Practice., 1(1), 17–24.
Jones, J. C. (1998). “Ph.D. research in design.” Des. Stud., 19(1), 5–7.
Kam, B. H. (1997). “Style and quality in research supervision: The supervisor dependency factor.” Higher Educ., 34(1), 81–103.
Kearns, H., and Gardiner, M. (2011). “The care and maintenance of your advisor.” Nature, 469(7331), 570.
Kember, D. (1997). “A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching.” Learn. Instruct., 7(3), 255–275.
Krauss, S. E., and Ismail, I. A. (2010). “Ph.D. students’ experiences of thesis supervision in Malaysia: Managing relationships in the midst of institutional change.” Qual. Rep., 15(4), 802–822.
Lee, A. (2008). “How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision.” Stud. Higher Educ., 33(3), 267–281.
Lee, A. (2010). “New approaches to doctoral supervision: Implications for educational development.” Educ. Dev., 11(2), 18–23.
Leinhardt, G., Young, K. M., and Merriman, J. (1995). “Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory.” Learn. Instruct., 5(4), 401–408.
Mainhard, T., Rijst, R. V. D., Tartwijk, J. V., and Wubbels, T. (2009). “A model for the supervisor-doctoral student relationship.” Higher Educ., 58(3), 359–373.
Momeni, M., Samini, B., Afshari, M. A., Maleki, M. H., and Mohammadi, J. (2011). “Selection process of supervisor for doctoral dissertation using analytical network process (ANP): An Iranian study.” J. Manage. Strategy, 2(2), 63–71.
Parpala, A., and Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). “University teachers’ conceptions of good teaching in the units of high-quality education.” Studies Educ. Eval., 33(3–4), 355–370.
Pitchforth, J., et al. (2012). “Factors affecting timely completion of a Ph.D.: A complex systems approach.” J. Scholarship Teach. Learn., 12(4), 124–135.
Punyanunt-Carter, N., Wrench, J. S., and Nance, H. (2014). “Comparing undergraduate and graduate perspectives of advisor international justice, sociocommunicative style, and credibility.” ⟨https://dus.psu.edu/mentor/2014/05/adviser-interactional-justice/⟩ (Oct. 6, 2016).
Rogers, C. A. (1997). “Dedication.” J. Intel. Mtl. Syst. Struct., 8(4), 283.
Sarangi, S. R. (2011). “True meaning of a Ph.D.: What to expect in a Ph.D.” ⟨http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/~srsarangi/articles.html⟩ (Oct. 5, 2016).
Sarchet, P. (2012). “Going the extra mile during your PhD.” New Scientist, 216(2895), 56–59.
Savage, B. M. (2013). “Observations on quality in the Ph.D. supervision experience.” Int. J. Inf. Oper. Manage. Educ., 5(2), 190–204.
Sodhi, M. S., and Tang, C. S. (2014). “Guiding the next generation of doctoral students in operations management.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 150, 28–36.
Titus, S. L., and Ballou, J. M. (2013). “Faculty members’ perceptions of advising versus mentoring: Does the name matter?” Sci. Eng. Ethics, 19(3), 1267–1281.
Vilkinas, T. (2002). “The Ph.D. process: The supervisor as manager.” Educ. + Training, 44(3), 129–137.
Vilkinas, T., and Cartan, G. (2001). “The behavioural control room for managers: The integrator role.” Lead. & Organ. Dev. J., 22(4), 175–185.
Vilkinas, T., and Cartan, G. (2006). “The integrated competing values framework: Its spatial configuration.” J. Manage. Dev., 25(6), 505–521.
Wamala, R., Oonyu, J., and Ocaya, B. (2011). “Completion time dynamics of doctoral studies at Makerere University: A hazard model evaluation.” J. Int. Educ. Res., 7(3), 49–58.
Whitelock, D., Faulkner, D., and Miell, D. (2008). “Promoting creativity in Ph.D. supervision: Tensions and dilemmas.” Thinking Skills Creativity, 3(2), 143–153.
Wright, T., and Cochrane, R. (2000). “Factors influencing successful submission of Ph.D. theses.” Studies Higher Educ., 25(2), 181–195.
Zorlu, G. (2010). “All abroad!.” New Scientist, 205(2748), 48–51.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143Issue 4October 2017

History

Received: Jul 28, 2016
Accepted: Nov 16, 2016
Published online: Feb 8, 2017
Discussion open until: Jul 8, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sreekumar Muthuswamy [email protected]
Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kancheepuram, Melakottaiyur, Chennai 600127, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Rezia Molfino [email protected]
PMAR Laboratory, Dept. of Mechanical, Energy, Management, and Transportation Engineering, Univ. of Genova, 15/a, Via all’Opera Pia, 16145 Genoa, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share