Technical Papers
Aug 8, 2016

Attitudes of Incoming Civil Engineering Students toward Sustainability as an Engineering Ethic

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143, Issue 2

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey of new civil engineering students at a large, conservative, land-grant university. Students were asked a set of questions about engineering ethics and professional issues; these were designed to determine their opinions on the relative importance of sustainability in the professional practice of engineering. Of 192 students approached, 130 (67%) completed the survey, with participant demographics resembling that of the department as a whole. Students viewed sustainability favorably, with nearly all agreeing (43%) or strongly agreeing (55%) with the statement “engineers should strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in the performance of their duties.” When asked to rank a set of societal priorities, students valued people-centric objectives (e.g., quality of human life) most highly followed by planet-centric objectives (e.g., quality of the environment). Prosperity-centric objectives (e.g., economic growth) were rated the lowest. Students from ethnic minorities ranked the objectives in ways significantly different (p<0.05) from the overall group, as did students intending to specialize in the subdisciplines of environmental engineering, water resources engineering, and geotechnical engineering. Gender appeared to have no effect on student views of sustainability or societal priorities. These findings have positive implications for the receptiveness and responsiveness of civil engineering students to sustainability education, particularly where affective, or behavioral-based, learning outcomes are desired.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CBET-1351558. The researchers would like to thank the students who participated, as well as Dr. Robin Autenrieth for her assistance with participant recruitment.

References

Allenby, B., Murphy, C., Allen, D., and Davidson, C. (2009). “Sustainable engineering education in the United States.” Sustainab. Sci., 4(1), 7–15.
ASCE. (2008). “Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future.” Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2016). “Code of ethics.” Reston, VA.
Demšar, J. (2006). “Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets.” J. Machine Learn. Res., 7(2006), 1–30.
Emanuel, R., and Adams, J. N. (2011). “College students’ perceptions of campus sustainability.” Int. J. Sustainability High. Educ., 12(1), 79–92.
Franzen, A., and Vogl, D. (2013). “Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries.” Global Environ. Change, 23(5), 1001–1008.
Funk, C., and Rainie, L. (2015). “Americans, politics and science issues.” Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
Hanks, K., Odom, W., Roedl, D., and Blevis, E. (2008). “Sustainable millennials: Attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies.” Proc., 26th Annual CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 333–342.
Howe, N., and Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation, Vintage, New York.
Kagawa, F. (2007). “Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change.” Int. J. Sustainability High. Educ., 8(3), 317–338.
Murphy, C. F., et al. (2009). “Sustainability in engineering education and research at U.S. universities.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(15), 5558–5564.
Princeton Review. (2015). “Most conservative students.” 〈http://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings?rankings=most-conservative-students〉 (Feb. 11, 2016).
Pryor, J. H., Eagan, K., Palucki Blake, L., Hurtado, S., Berdan, J., and Case, M. H. (2012). “The American freshman: National norms fall 2012.” Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Qualtrics [Computer software]. Qualtrics LLC, Provo, UT.
Shepard, K. (2008). “Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes.” Int. J. Sustainability High. Educ., 9(1), 87–98.
Texas Aggie Conservatives. (2012). “How conservative (or liberal) is Texas A&M?” 〈http://www.aggieconservatives.org/tamuliberalism〉 (Feb. 11, 2016).
Yoder, B. L. (2014). “Engineering by the numbers.” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143Issue 2April 2017

History

Received: Feb 16, 2016
Accepted: Jul 8, 2016
Published online: Aug 8, 2016
Discussion open until: Jan 8, 2017
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gretchen R. Miller, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kelly Brumbelow, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share