Improving the Outcomes of Public Drainage Projects through NEC3-Based Relational Contracting: Hong Kong Case Study
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 142, Issue 2
Abstract
Since its publication in 2005, the New Engineering Contract Version 3 (NEC3) [ICE (2013). New Engineering Contract 3] has increasingly been promoted as a relational contracting instrument for establishing mutual trust and for facilitating interorganizational collaboration. However, only a few empirical studies have documented the use of this contract in practice. Therefore, the current research investigates the initiation, execution, benefits, and critical factors in the implementation of NEC3-based relational practices. The lessons learned from this implementation are compared with those derived from the application of the integrated project delivery (IPD) approach in the United States. This study also analyzes the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) [ICE (2005). NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract] through a case study of the first pilot project in Hong Kong to adopt this new contract. Study findings not only reinforce the usefulness of well-established relational components (namely proactive risk mitigation, efficient change management, and transparent cost monitoring) in the NEC3/ECC, but also highlight local experiences (such as early implementation, joint problem solving, interorganizational team development, and regular partnering review) to enhance relational contracting further. Finally, NEC3 implementation is compared with that of the IPD. These results are beneficial to clients and contracting organizations, particularly inexperienced ones, in terms of the proper implementation of NEC3-based relational contracting for future projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper has been funded by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71390523).
References
AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2009). “Integrated project delivery (IPD) family.” 〈〉 (Nov. 26, 2014).
Chan, K. K. (2012). “Administration experience from Project Manager’s perspective.” 〈http://www.dsd.gov.hk/EN/Files/AD%2020120202%20HKIE_revised.pdf〉. (Dec. 10, 2013).
ConsensusDOCS. (2009). “Construction contracts built by consensus.” 〈〉 (Jul. 2, 2009).
Drainage Services Department. (2013). “Technical manuals: New construction contract.” 〈〉 (Jan. 7, 2014).
Gerard, R. (2005). “Relational contracts—NEC in perspective.” Lean Constr. J., 2(1), 80–86.
Hughes, K. (2013). “Understanding the NEC3 ECC contract: A practical handbook.” Routledge, Abingdon, England.
ICE (Institution of Civil Engineers). (2005). NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract, Thomas Telford, London.
ICE (Institution of Civil Engineers). (2013). NEC3 April 2013 Edition Complete Family of Contracts, Thomas Telford, London.
Tsui, W. (2012a). “Tender preparation and administration of NEC contracts.” 〈http://www.dsd.gov.hk/EN/Files/DD%2020120602_revised.pdf〉 (Dec. 10, 2013).
Tsui, W. (2012b). “Why NEC in Hong Kong? DSD’s experience on NEC.” 〈http://www.dsd.gov.hk/EN/Files/DD%2020121121_revised.pdf〉 (Dec. 10, 2013).
Wright, J. N., and Fergusson, W. (2009). “Benefits of the NEC ECC form of contract: A New Zealand case study.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 27(3), 243–249.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 7, 2014
Accepted: Jul 29, 2015
Published online: Oct 5, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 5, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.