Sustainable Construction Education Using Problem-Based Learning and Service Learning Pedagogies
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 141, Issue 1
Abstract
Incorporating the concepts of sustainable development in engineering education is becoming a necessity in order to prepare future professionals with the dynamic mindset and broad knowledge needed to effectively and efficiently solve the interdisciplinary challenges of the 21st century. To this end, utilizing the principles of active learning towards sustainable construction education leads to stronger learning outcomes and development for students. The objective is to enhance the undergraduate student skill-set that is required to make them more enabled, aligned, and supported to design, construct, and operate our infrastructure systems. In this paper, the authors provide the associated course development principles grounded in problem-based-learning (PBL) and service-learning (SL) pedagogies, course management strategy, as well as the educational and learning philosophies. To this end, the course PBL activities utilized interrelated and mutually supportive assignments and projects where the assigned problems were not created equally (i.e., varying in complexity and structuredness). Through the evolution of problem-based course activities, the students were engaged in a service-based assignment in relation to the LEED certification process for a new on-campus building. Also, the associated student work was shared with the project developers for potential usage, and resulted in a peer-reviewed journal paper that is forthcoming in the Journal of Management in Engineering. The results and analysis associated with this study were comprised of PBL activity characterization, instructor evaluation of student performance, and student self-reflections of the course. The results suggest that even with increased complexity of PBL activities, students’ performance increased throughout the semester. Although arriving with some resistance, students ultimately took ownership of the entire educational experience and completed a final open-ended, complex, and authentic service learning activity. Through engaging students in discussions and guiding their reflections on scientific material, instructors are regarded as facilitators and collaborators rather than sources of authority. This paper provides an example that could be followed by other engineering faculty in setting and planning big goals for engineering students.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002). “Project 2061 update.” Washington, DC.
Beliveau, Y. J., and Peter, D. (2002a). “Educating the builder of tomorrow: A constructivist educational model.” Proc., 38th Associated Schools of Construction Annual Conf., Associated School of Construction, Windsor, CO.
Beliveau, Y. J., and Peter, D. (2002b). “Educating the builder of tomorrow: Can we do it better?” Proc., 38th Associated Schools of Construction Annual Conf., Associated School of Construction, Windsor, CO.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain, David McKay, New York.
Boyer Commission on Education of Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). “Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research Universities.” S. S. Kenny (chair), State Univ. of New York-Stony Brook.
Bringle, R., and Hatcher, J. (1995). “A service-learning curriculum for faculty.” Michigan J. Commun. Serv. Learn., 2(1), 112–122.
Brody, S. (2003). “Modeling watershed flooding and adaptive flood management: An integrative plan for research, teaching, and learning.” College of Architecture, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Carberry, A. R. (2010). “Characterizing learning-through-service students in engineering by gender and academic year.” Ph.D. dissertation, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA.
Fernandez, J., Cabal, V., Balsera, J., and Huerta, G. (2010). “Application of PBL methodology to the teaching of engineering project management.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 58–63.
Fiske, E. (2002). “Learning in deed: The power of service-learning for American schools.” A report for the national commission on service-learning, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and instruction, Wiley, NJ, 221–239.
Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education. (2012). “Problem-based learning at the University of Delaware.” 〈http://www.udel.edu/inst/〉 (Jul. 9, 2012).
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). “Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 45(1), 65–95.
Jonassen, D. H., and Hung, W. (2008). “All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning.” Interdiscip. J. Prob. Based Learn., 2(2), 6–28.
Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., and Lee, C. B. (2006). “Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators.” J. Eng. Edu., 95(2), 139–151.
Kenny, S. S. (2002). Reinventing undergraduate education: Three years after the Boyer report, Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research Univ., Stanford, CA.
Lee, N. (2010). “Design issues and implementation strategies for game and simulation-based learning in construction education.” Proc., 46th Associated Schools of Construction Annual Conf., Associated School of Construction, Windsor, CO.
Machtmes, K., et al. (2009). “Teaching qualitative research methods through service-learning.” The Qualitative Rep., Vol. 14, Nova Southeastern Univ., Fort Lauderdale, FL, 155–164.
National Research Council. (2003). “Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.” Washington, DC.
National Science Foundation. (1996). “New expectation for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology.” NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Washington, DC.
Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., and Crane, M. (2000). “Toward an understanding of authentic learning: Student perceptions of an authentic classroom.” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 9(1), 79–94.
Perkins, D., and Blythe, T. (1994). “Putting understanding up-front.” Educ. Leadersh., 60(2), 4–7.
Pierrakos, O., et al. (2013). “All problems are not created equal: Intentional design of learning experiences grounded on an innovative and versatile problem based learning model.” 5th Annual Conf. on Higher Education Pedagogy, Virginia Tech.
Pierrakos, O., et al. (2014). “A mixed-methods study of cognitive and affective learning during a sophomore design problem-based service learning experience.” Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng., 1–28.
Pierrakos, O., Kander, R., Pappas, E., Prins, R., and Anderson, R. (2009). “CCLI: Design and implementation of an innovative problem-based learning model and assessment tools in undergraduate engineering education.” School of Engineering, James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA.
Pierrakos, O., Watson, H., Kander, R., Anderson, R., and Russell, J. (2010). “Special session—Not all problems are created equal: From problem-based learning theory to research on complex problem solving and implications for the engineering classroom.” The 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., ASEE, Washington, DC.
Ribeiro, L., and Mizukami, M. (2005). “Student assessment of problem-based learning experiment in civil engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 13–18.
Russell, J., Pierrakos, O., France, M., Kander, R., Anderson, A., and Watson, H. (2010). “Incorporating problem based learning (PBL) in a freshman engineering course: Methods for classifying and assessing PBL projects.” ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, ASEE, Washington, DC.
Schmidt, H. G. (1993). “Foundation of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes.” Med. Educ., 27(5), 422–432.
Starzyk, G., McDonald, M., Nuttell, B., Mwangi, J., Clay, G. (2011). “Instructional design for an integrated project delivery studio.” Proc., 47th Associated Schools of Construction Annual Conf., Associated School of Construction, Windsor, CO.
Steinemann, A. (2003). “Implemeneting sustainable development through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 216–224.
Talbert, M., Farnkhopf, S., Jones, S. A., and Houghtalen, R. (2003). “Combining service learning with graduate education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 211–215.
Utecht, J. (2003). “Problem-based learning in the student centered classroom.” 〈http://www.jeffutecht.com/docs/PBL.pdf〉 (Jul. 9, 2012).
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and Klotz, L. (2011). “Incorporating the social dimension of sustainability into civil engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues in Eng. Educ. Pract., 189–197.
Wang, Y. (2009). “Sustainability in construction education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 21–30.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 141 • Issue 1 • January 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 2, 2013
Accepted: Mar 19, 2014
Published online: May 12, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2014
Published in print: Jan 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.