Technical Papers
Nov 7, 2013

Changing University Student Perceptions of Freight Transportation

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140, Issue 1

Abstract

This study examines civil engineering students’ perceptions of freight transportation and its impacts on the environment and society. Research and anecdotal evidence suggests students enter into the field of transportation because they want to improve systems that impact the environment and/or society, and despite freight transportation’s increasing momentum as an emerging industry and research path, freight is often perceived as counter to sustainability, focused solely on profitability, and thus not as appealing to transportation students. This paper investigates whether increased exposure to and knowledge of freight transportation can change students’ perceptions of the field by either illustrating the potential for future environmental and sustainability gains within freight transportation or by illustrating the relationships between freight transportation and other contemporary transportation issues. Perceptions of students who took introductory freight transportation classes at several universities were measured using precourse and postcourse surveys to help better understand the influence of increased knowledge in freight transportation. Results indicate that after students have taken an introductory freight class, they more strongly agreed that there are sustainability improvements and gains to be had within freight transportation. Additionally, students made stronger connections between freight transportation and contemporary freight transportation issues after taking a freight class. These findings indicate that introductory freight transportation courses are useful in helping students understand the importance of and develop an interest in freight transportation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mihalis Golias, Matt Roorda, Miguel Figliozzi, and Ed McCormack for their participation and assistance with survey distribution.

References

Agrawal, A. W., and Dill, J. (2008). “To be a transportation engineer or not? How civil engineering students choose a specialization.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 76–84.
Anderson, M. D., Harris, G. A., and Harrison, K. (2010). “Using aggregated federal data to model freight in a medium-sized community.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 33–43.
Battelle. (2003). “Evaluation of the Freightliner intelligent vehicle initiative field operational test, final report.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Battelle. (2007). “Evaluation of the Volvo intelligent vehicle initiative field operational test, version 1.3, final report.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Bill, A., et al. (2011). “Development of knowledge tables and learning outcomes for an introductory course in transportation engineering.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 27–35.
Cambridge Systematics, Prime Focus, LLC, and Heanue, K. (2007). “Guidebook for integrating freight into transportation planning and project selection processes.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Christensen Associates, University of Texas at Austin—Center for Transportation Research, Grow and Bruening, and Pett, K.H.S. (2012). “Preserving and protecting freight infrastructure and routes.”, National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Council of University Transportation Centers (CUTC). (2012). “National transportation workforce summit, summary of results.” 〈http://www.mwrtba.org/cutcworkforce/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/NTWS_Summary_of_Results1.pdf〉 (Apr. 15, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012). “MAP-21 Freight Provisions.” Talking Freight, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/freight_planning/talking_freight/12talking.cfm〉 (Feb. 20, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2013a). “Professional development.” Freight Management and Operations, 〈http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/fpd/〉 (Apr. 15, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2013b). “Transportation workforce development.” 〈http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/transworkforce/index.html〉 (Apr. 15, 2013).
Figliozzi, M. A. (2010). “Vehicle routing problem for emissions minimization.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–7.
I-95 Corridor Coalition. (2013). “Freight academy.” 〈http://www.freightacademy.org/index.html http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/fpd/〉 (Apr. 15, 2013).
Keenan, C., Sprung, M., Strocko, E., Schmitt, R., Rick, C., and Sedor, J. (2012). “Freight facts and figures 2012.”, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Long, S., and Grasman, S. E. (2012). “A strategic decision model for evaluating inland freight hub locations.” Res. Transp. Business Manage., 5, 92–98.
Mannering, F. L., Washburn, S. S., and Kilareski, W. P. (2008). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Orban, J., Hadden, J., Stark, G., and Brown, V. (2006). “Evaluation of the mack intelligent vehicle initiative field operational test, final report.”, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation.
Pitera, K., Sandoval, F., and Goodchild, A. (2011). “Evaluation of emissions reduction in urban pickup systems.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 8–16.
Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA). (2013). “Our critical workforce challenge.” 〈http://www.rita.dot.gov/ntwd/challenge/index.html〉 (Apr. 16, 2013).
Schmitt, R., Strocko, E., and Sedor, J. (2008). “Freight Story 2008.”. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Turochy, R. (2006). “Determining the content of the first course in transportation engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 200–203.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2013). “Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2011.”, Washington, DC.
Wittwer, E., Adams, T., and Toledo-Duran, E. (2009). “21st century workforce development summit.” Publication WisDOT 0092-09-14, CFIRE 01-10.http://www.wistrans.org/cfire/documents/01-10_CFIRE_FR.pdf〉 (Apr. 15, 2013).
Zhao, W., McCormack, E., Dailey, D., and Scharnhorst, E. (2013). “Using truck probe GPS data to identify and rank roadway bottlenecks.” J. Transp. Eng., 1–7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140Issue 1January 2014

History

Received: Apr 26, 2013
Accepted: Sep 19, 2013
Published online: Nov 7, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 7, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kelly Pitera [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 7A, Trondheim, Norway 7491. E-mail: [email protected]
Anne Goodchild [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share