Technical Papers
Nov 17, 2011

Attributes of Hong Kong Construction Engineering Student Learning Approaches: Investigation of Chinese and Western Personal Values

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 138, Issue 3

Abstract

Members of the construction engineering profession require developing not only technical knowledge but also various personal attitudes and values to enable them to keep abreast of an ever-changing body of knowledge and solve construction dilemmas. However, construction engineering education in Hong Kong emphasizes students’ professional and technical training and pays less attention to their personal development, despite previous studies having identified that personal values have a significant effect on learning. Inappropriate personal values in education can result in students becoming surface learners whose only aim is to achieve a pass or a particular grade. A student’s learning approaches will not only affect his or her academic performance but also shape further personal and professional development when working in the construction industry after graduation. For these reasons, it is essential to investigate the complicated relationships between the personal values and learning approaches of construction students so that educators can develop and refine their programs so as to help students cultivate appropriate personal value systems and hence, develop proper learning approaches. Nevertheless, no study yet has looked at the personal values and learning approaches of construction engineering students in Hong Kong. This paper aims to investigate the relationships between construction engineering students’ personal values and their learning approaches, which involve both motivation to learn and the learning strategies subsequently selected. An anonymous survey of all students studying construction engineering-related programs at four universities in Hong Kong was conducted, and the data were analyzed by using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The study identified five value factors, including work competence, intra-personal integration, openness to others, ideal life, and social conservatism. Work competence and openness to others may induce students to adopt deep learning and discourage them to use surface learning; in contrast, ideal life and social conservatism are associated positively with surface learning and negatively with deep learning. To enhance the learning approaches of each student group, construction educators should not only focus on technical knowledge and skills but also foster the development of appropriate personal value systems to help instill a positive, deep learning approach over the longterm.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Project No. 9230056).

References

Abudayyeh, O., Russell, J., Johnston, D., and Rowings, J. (2000). “Construction engineering and management undergraduate education.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 126(3), 169–175.
Ballard, B., and Clanchy, J. (1997). Teaching international students: A brief guide for lecturers and supervisors, Deakin ACT: IDP Education Melbourne, Australia.
Bernold, L. (2005). “Paradigm shift in construction education is vital for the future of our profession.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 131(5), 533–539.
Betts, M., and Liow, S. R. (1993). “The relationship between teaching methods and educational objectives in building education.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 11(2), 131–141.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the learning and study process questionnaires, Faculty of Education, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university, Open Univ. Press, Philadelphia.
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., and Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). “The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.” Br. J. Educ. Psychol.BJESAE, 71(1), 133–149.
Bond, M. H., and Forgas, J. P. (1984). “Linking person perception to behavior intention across cultures.” J. Cross Cult. Psychol.JCPGB5, 15(3), 337–352.
Bostrom, L., Lassen, L. M. (2006). “Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and meta-cognition.” Educ. TrainingEDTRDC, 48(2/3), 178–189.
Braithwaite, V. A., and Law, H. (1985). “Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey.” J. Pers. Soc. PsycholJPSPB2, 49(1), 250–263.
Byrne, M., Flood, B., and Willis, P. (2002). “The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students.” Account. Educ., 11(1), 27–42.
Carden, A. D. (1990). “Mentoring and adult career development: The evolution of a theory.” Counsel. Psychol.CPQUEZ, 18(2), 275–299.
Chang, W. C., Wong, W. K., and Koh, B. B. K. (2003). “Chinese values in Singapore: Traditional and modern.” Asian J. Soc. Psychol., 6(1), 5–29.
Chau, K. (2005). “Problem-based learning approach in accomplishing innovation and entrepreneurship of civil engineering undergraduates.” Int. J. Eng. Educ.IEEDEF, 21(2), 228–232.
Chin, W. W. (1998). “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.” Modern methods for business research, Marcoulides, G. A., ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 295–336.
Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). “Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture.” J. Cross Cult. PsycholJCPGB5., 18(2), 143–164.
Chiu, R. K. (1992). “Understanding organizational stress: A cultural perspective.” Proc., Meeting of the 1992 Annual Conference of the Midwest Society for Human Resources/Industrial Relations, Chicago, 153–160.
Chiu, R. K., and Kosinski, F. A. Jr. (1995). “Chinese culture collectivism and work-related stress: Implications for employment counselors. J. Employ. Counsel.JECODE, 32(3), 98–110.
Davidson, R. A. (2002). “Relationship of study approach and exam performance.” J. Account. Educ, 20(1), 29–44.
Diseth, A. (2003). “Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement.” Eur. J. PersonalityEJPEEU, 17(2), 143–155.
Entwistle, N. (1998). “Approaches to learning and forms of understanding.” Teaching and learning in higher education, Barry, D. and Gillian, B. eds., Australian Council for Educational Research Press, Melbourne, Australia, 72–101.
Ermer, G. E. (2008). “Professionals engineering ethics and Christian values: Overlapping magisteria.” Perspect. Sci. Christ. Faith, 60(1), 26–34.
Fang, Y. (2000). “A classification of Chinese culture.” Cross Cult. Manage., 7(1), 3–10.
Feather, N. T. (1992). “Values, valences, expectations, and actions.” J. Soc. IssuesJSISAF, 48(2), 109–124.
Feather, N. T. (1995). “Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives.” J. Pers. Soc. PsycholJPSPB2, 68(6), 1135–1151.
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.” J. Marketing Res.JMKRAE, 18(1), 39–50.
Gibson, P. A. (2008). “Teaching ethical decision making: Designing a personal value portrait to ignite creativity and promote personal engagement in case method analysis.” Ethics Behav., 18(4), 340–352.
Gow, L., Kember, D., and Cooper, B. (1994). “The teaching context and approaches to study of accountancy students.” Issues Account. Educ., 9(1), 118–130.
Groves, R. M., and Peytcheva, E. (2008). “The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis.” Public Opin. Q.POPQAE, 72(2), 167–189.
Gupta, M. L. (2004). “Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical science.” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ.AEHEED, 29(1), 63–73.
Hair, J. F. J., Andersen, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis.” Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Heath, R. L., and Fogel, D. S. (1978). “Terminal and instrumental? An inquiry into Rokeach’s value survey.” Psychol. RepPYRTAZ, 42(3), 1147–1154.
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2008). Hong Kong Fact Sheets—Education, Vol. 2009, Information Services Dept., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, Hong Kong.
Hofer, B. K., and Yu, S. L. (2003). “Teaching self-regulated learning through a “learning to learn” course.” Teach. Psychol, 30(1), 30–33.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw Hill, New York.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Hofstede, G. H., and Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Sage Publications, London.
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations.” Struct. Equ. ModelSEMTC7, 6(1), 1–55.
Huang, Y. (1996). “ZhuXi on Ren (humanity) and love: A neo-Confucian way out of the liberal-communitarian impasse.” J. Chinese Philos, 23(2), 213–235.
Kember, D. (2000). “Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students.” Higher Educ., 40(1), 99–121.
Kim, D. J., Feeein, D. L., and Rao, H. R. (2008). “A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents.” Decis. Support Syst.DSSYDK, 44, 544–564.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). “Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification.” Toward a general theory of action, Parsons, T. and Shils, E., eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 388–433.
Law, F. (2003). “Speech by the secretary for education and manpower, Mrs. Fanny law, at the business coalition on education luncheon.” 〈http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?lngno=1&nodeid=1327〉 (Apr. 15, 2012).
Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P., and Kember, D. (2008a). “Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney.” J. Cross Cult. PsycholJCPGB5, 39(3), 251–266.
Leung, M. Y. (2001). “Value management in construction projects.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Leung, M. Y., Chan, Y. S., and Chong, M. L. A. (2010). “Chinese values and stressors of construction professionals in Hong Kong.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(12), 1289–1298.
Leung, M. Y., Cheung, S. O., and Fong, S. Y. (2002). “Quantity surveying education for a new generation.” J. Build. Surv., 3(1), 2–7.
Leung, M., Ng, S. T., and Li, Y. (2004). “Evaluating learning approaches of construction students in Hong Kong through a matrix framework.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.JPEPE3, 130(3), 189–196.
Leung, M. Y., Li, Y. K., Feng, Z., Lu, X. H., and Mu, M. (2006). “Learning approaches of construction engineering students: A comparative study between Hong Kong and Mainland China.” J. Educ. Built Environ., 1(1), 112–131.
Leung, M. Y., Wang, Y., and Chan, D. K. K. (2007). “Structural surface-achieving model in the teaching and learning process for construction engineering students.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.JPEPE3, 133(4), 327–339.
Leung, M. Y., Lu, X., Chen, D. Y., and Lu, M. (2008b). “Impacts of teaching approaches on learning approaches of construction engineering students: A comparative study between Hong Kong and Mainland China.” J. Eng. Educ.JEEDEQ, 97(2), 135–145.
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., and Sears, P. S. (1944). “Level of aspiration.” Personality and the behavior disorders, Hunt, J. M., ed., Ronald Press, New York, 333–378.
Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., and Tang, J. (2008). “Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students.” J. Eng. Educ.JEEDEQ, 97(1), 47–56.
Liu, A. M. M., and Leung, M. (2002). “Developing a soft value management model.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 20(5), 341–349.
Matthews, B. (2000). “The Chinese value survey: An interpretation of value scales and consideration of some preliminary results.” Int. Educ. J., 1(2), 117–126.
Matthews, B. (2001). “The relationship between values and learning.” Int. Educ. J., 2(4), 223–232.
McKinlay, N. J., and Pattison, H. M. (1996). “An exploratory investigation of the effects of a cultural orientation programme on the psychological well-being of international university students.” High. Educ., 31(3), 379–394.
McNabb, R., Pal, S., and Sloane, P. (2002). “Gender differences in educational attainment: The case of university students in England and Wales.” EconometricaECMTA7, 69(275), 481–503.
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oldstone-Moore, J. (2002). Confucianism: Origins, beliefs, practices, holy texts, sacred places, Oxford University Press, New York.
Phan, H. P., and Deo, B. (2007). “The revised learning process questionnaire: A validation of a western model of students’ study approaches to the South Pacific context using confirmatory factor analysis.” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 77(3), 719–739.
Quinn, K. A., and Albano, L. D. (2008). “Problem-based learning in structural engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.JPEPE3, 134(4), 329–334.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values, Free Press, New York.
Salvin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). “Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?J. Soc. IssuesJSISAF, 50(4), 19–45.
Schwartz, S. H. (1996). “Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems.” Psychol. Values, 8, 1–24.
Shelbourn, M., Aouad, G., and Hoxley, M. (2001). “Multimedia in construction education: New dimensions.” Autom. Constr.AUCOES, 10(2), 265–274.
Sinha, S. K., Thomas, H. R., and Kulka, J. R. (2007). “Integrating ethics into the engineered construction curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.JPEPE3, 133(4), 291–300.
Tran, A. (2007). “A learning center vocabulary reading activity for English language learners.” The Clearing House, 81(2), 61–62.
Ulloa, B. C., and Adams, S. G. (2004). “Attitude toward teamwork and effective teaming.” Team Perform. Manage., 10, 145–152.
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., and Cooper, H. (2004). “The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review.” Educ. Psychol.EDPSDT, 39(2), 111–133.
Walker, A. (1996). Project management in construction, Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
Watkins, D. A., and Biggs, J. B. (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences, Australian Council of Educational Research, Hong Kong.
Wixom, B. H., and Todd, P. A. (2005). “A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance.” Inf. Syst. Res.: J. Inst. Manage. SciISYREH, 16(1), 85–102.
Yamazaki, Y. (2005). “Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison.” Int. J. Intercult. Rel., 29, 521–548.
Yong, F. L. (2010). “A study on the cultural values, perceptual learning styles, and attitudes towards oracy skills of Malaysian tertiary students.” Eur. J. Soc. Sci., 13(3), 478–492.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 138Issue 3July 2012
Pages: 224 - 233

History

Received: Sep 1, 2011
Accepted: Nov 15, 2011
Published online: Nov 17, 2011
Published in print: Jul 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mei-yung Leung [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Aveune, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Dongyu Chen [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Economics and Management, Fuzhou Univ., China. E-mail: [email protected]
Isabelle Yee Shan Chan [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Real Estate and Construction, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulum Rd., Hong Kong, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share