Enhancing Transportation Education through Online Simulation Using an Agent-Based Demand and Assignment Model
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 137, Issue 1
Abstract
This research explores the effectiveness of using simulation as a tool for enhancing classroom learning in the Civil Engineering Department of the University of Minnesota at Twin Cities. The authors developed a modern transportation planning software package, Agent-Based Demand and Assignment Model (ADAM), that is consistent with our present understanding of travel behavior, that is platform independent, and that is easy to learn and is thus usable by students. An in-class project incorporated ADAM and the performance of this education strategy was evaluated through preclass survey, postclass survey, scores in the quiz focusing on travel demand modeling, and final scores. Results showed that ADAM effectively enhanced students’ self-reported understanding of transportation planning and their skills of forming opinions, evaluating projects, and making judgments. Students who prefer visual and active learning were found to benefit more than others through simulation-based teaching strategy. Findings in this research could have significant implications for future practice of simulation-based teaching strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0717504. STREET: Simulating Transportation for Realistic Engineering and Education and the University of Minnesota Digital Media Center.
References
Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., and Vogel, D. R. (1997). “Using information technology to add value to management education.” Acad. Manage J., 40(6), 1310–1333.
Banks, J. H. (2002). Introduction to transportation engineering, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Billhardt, B. (2004). “The promise of on-line simulation.” MediaTec Publishing, Inc., Chicago, ⟨http://www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_feature.asp?articleid=382⟩ (July 18, 2006).
Bolay, K., and Helbing, D. (2006). Cellular automaton traffic simulators. ⟨http://rcswww.urz.tu-dresden.de/~helbing/RoadApplet/⟩ (July 18, 2006).
Carlson, L. E., and Sullivan, J. F. (1999). “Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program.” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 15, 20–31.
Chen, W. and Levinson, D M. (2006). “Effectiveness of learning transportation network growth through simulation.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 132(1), 29–41.
Chickering, A., and Gamson, Z. (1987). “Seven principles for good practice.” AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.
Felder, R. M., and Silverman, L. K. (1988). “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.” Eng. Educ., 78(7), 674–681.
Hadgraft, R. G. (1992). “Experiences of two problem-oriented courses in Civil Engineering.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 17(4), 345–353.
Handy, S., Weston, L., Song, J., Maria, K., and Lane, D. (2002). “Education of transportation planning professionals.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1812, 151–160.
ITE Technical Council Committee 2-32. (1990). “Attracting students to a professional career in transportation engineering.” ITE J., 60(1), 42–48.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall, N.J.
Lipinski, M. E., and Wilson, E. M. (1992). “Undergraduate transportation education: Who is responsible?” ITE J., 63(8), 29–32.
Los Alamos National Laboratory. (1998). “Cellular automation traffic microsimulation,” Paper Prepared for the U. S. Dept. of Energy, Univ. of California, ⟨http://public.lanl.gov/bwb/Java/lanl/bwbush/transims/simulate.html⟩ (Jul. 18, 2006).
Mason, J. M. (2003). “Transportation education and workforce development.” ITE J., 73(9), 22–25.
Mills, J. E., and Treagust, D. F. (2003). “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?” Aust. J. Eng. Educ., 3, 2–16 ⟨http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf⟩.
Parthasarathi, P., Levinson, D., and Karamalaputi, R. (2003). “Induced demand: A microscopic perspective.” Urban Stud., 40(7), 1335–1351.
Rafaeli, S., Raban, R. D., Ravid, G., and Noya, A. (2003). “On-line simulations in management education about information and its use.” Research in management education and development, Information Age Publishing, Inc., Charlotte, N.C., 53–80.
Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Stoffa, V., and Slovakia, N. (2004). “Modelling and simulation as a recognizing method in education.” Educ. Media Int., 41(1), 51–58.
Treiber, M. (2005). “Microsimulation of road traffic.” Dresden Univ. of Technology, Dresden, Germany, ⟨http://vwisb7.vkw.tu-dresden.de/~treiber/MicroApplet/⟩ (July 18, 2006).
Zhang, L., and Levinson, D. (2004). “Agent-Based approach to travel demand modeling: An exploratory analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1898, 28–36.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 137 • Issue 1 • January 2011
Pages: 38 - 45
Copyright
© 2011 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 4, 2009
Accepted: Apr 5, 2010
Published online: Apr 13, 2010
Published in print: Jan 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.