Quantifying Groundwater to Sediment and Surface Water Loads for Mercury and Lead in Tidal Wetlands: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 7
Abstract
Portions of the marsh sediments at the LCP Chemicals Georgia Site (Site) were dredged and removed in 1999. However, sediment samples obtained four years later showed 0.54 average mercury concentrations within the remediated portion of the marsh. Groundwater was investigated as a potential contributor to recontamination. A mass discharge study on a transect running along the marsh/upland boundary was used to calculate mass discharges from upland groundwater to sediment and surface water for mercury and lead. Using conservative assumptions, the groundwater loading analysis showed that the maximum spatially averaged groundwater contribution of mercury to the sediments was , less than the measured sediment concentration () by an order of magnitude. The discharge analysis also showed that low marsh sediment porewater concentrations result in an infinitesimal change in the water quality in the stream when diluted by mixing with surface water. The magnitude of the mass discharge, in accordance with an established classification system, indicated that both mercury and lead plumes were classified as Mag 5 plumes at the Site. That is, a stream flowing at 0.028 [1 cubic foot per second (cfs)] would not be threatened by the discharge from this Site, and flow at this Site is significantly higher than (1 cfs). This work demonstrated that the groundwater pathway for lead and mercury does not contribute significantly to the degradation of sediments or water quality in this marsh. This paper demonstrates the use of relatively straightforward mass balance calculations using data collected from strategically positioned monitoring wells to evaluate the potential offshore flux of groundwater contaminants and their potential impact on surface sediment and surface water.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used in this study are available in an online repository in accordance with funder data retention policies (https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/lcp_feasibility_study_june_2_2014.pdf).
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Honeywell as part of the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study performed to evaluate contaminant fate and transport and sediment remedy alternatives for offshore sediments.
References
Bianchin, M., L. Smith, and R. Beckie. 2010. “Quantifying hyporheic exchange in a tidal river using temperature time series.” Water Resour. Res. 46: W07507. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008365.
ENVIRON and Anchor QEA. 2015. “Feasibility study LCP chemical superfund site Brunswick, Georgia.” Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/lcp_feasibility_study_june_2_2014.pdf.
Environmental Planning Specialists and ENVIRON. 2012. “Remedial investigation report operable unit one – Estuary, LCP chemicals site Brunswick Georgia.” Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/remedial_investi_report_october_2012.pdf.
Farhat, S. K., and C. J. Newell. 2011. Mass flux toolkit, user’s manual, version 2.0. Houston, TX: GSI Environmental.
ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2010. Use and measurement of mass flux and mass discharge. Washington, DC: ITRC, Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy Team.
Newell, C. J., S. K. Farhat, D. T. Adamson, and B. B. Looney. 2011. “Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge.” Ground Water 49 (6): 914–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00793.x.
USEPA. 1996. Supplemental report, LCP chemical site, Brunswick, GA. Edison, NJ: Environmental Response Team Center.
USEPA. 2015. Record of decision, LCP chemicals site, operable unit 1—Marsh, Glynn County, GA. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 21, 2019
Accepted: Jan 3, 2020
Published online: Apr 24, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 24, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.