Development of Chemical Reduction and Air Stripping Processes to Remove Mercury from Wastewater
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 11
Abstract
This study evaluates the removal of mercury from wastewater using chemical reduction and air stripping with a full-scale treatment system at the Savannah River Site. The existing water treatment system utilizes air stripping as the unit operation to remove organic compounds from groundwater that also contains mercury (). The baseline air stripping process was ineffective in removing mercury from the water that exceeded a proposed limit of . To test an enhancement to the existing treatment modality a continuous dose of reducing agent was injected for 6 h at the inlet of the air stripper. This action resulted in the chemical reduction of mercury to Hg(0), a species that is removable with the existing unit operation. During the injection period a 94% decrease in concentration was observed and the effluent satisfied proposed limits. The process was optimized over a 2-day period by sequentially evaluating dose rates ranging from 0.64–297X stoichiometry. A minimum dose of 16X stoichiometry was necessary to initiate the reduction reaction that facilitated mercury removal. Competing electron acceptors likely inhibited the reaction at the lower doses, which prevented removal by air stripping. These results indicate that chemical reduction coupled with air stripping can effectively treat large volumes of water to emerging part-per-trillion regulatory standards for mercury.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The information contained in this paper was developed during the course of work under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 and DE-AC09-08SR22470 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
References
Clever, H., Iwamoto, M., Johnson, S., and Miyamoto, H. (1987). Mercury in liquids, compressed gases, molten salts and other elements, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FTRT). (2002). Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide, 4th Ed., U.S. Army Environmental Center, Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Fu, F., and Wang, Q. (2011). “Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review.” J. Environ. Manage., 92(3), 407–418.
Gokel, G. W. (2003). Dean’s handbook of organic chemistry, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hozalski, R. M., Esbri-Amador, E., and Chen, C. F. (2005). “Comparison of stannous chloride and phosphate for lead corrosion control.” J. AWWA, 97(3), 89–103.
Jackson, D. G., Denham, M. E., and Looney, B. B. (2006). “A framework for the transport and release of mercury from DNAPL.” Remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds—2006. Proc., Fifth Int. Conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Bruce M. Sass, ed., Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
Kavanaugh, M. C., and Trussell, T. R. (1980). “Design of aeration towers to strip volatile contaminants from drinking water,” J. AWWA, 72(12), 684–692.
Klasson, K. T., Kosny, K., Drescher, S. R., Southworth, G. R., and Hensley, J. F. (2003). “Reaching parts per trillion clean-up criterion for mercury in water.” Waste Management 2003 Symp., Tucson, AZ.
Lide, D. R., ed. (2000). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 81st Ed., CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Lockheed Martin, Inc. (1996). “Mercury abatement report on the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant: Fiscal year 1996.” Technical Rep. Y/ER-277, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, TN, 10.2172/419118.
Looney, B. B., Denham, M. E., Jr., Vangelas, K. M., and Bloom, N. S. (2003). “Removal of mercury from low-concentration aqueous streams using chemical reduction and air stripping,” J. Environ. Eng., 129(9), 819–825.
Montgomery, J. M. (1985). Water treatment principles and design, Wiley, New York, 237–261.
Rorabacher, D. B. (1991). “Statistical treatment for rejection of deviant values: Critical values of dixon Q parameter and related subrange ratios at the 95 percent confidence level,” Anal. Chem., 63(2), 139–146.
Schwarzenbach, R., Gschwend, P., and Imboden, D. (1993). Environmental organic chemistry, Wiley, New York.
Southworth, G. R., et al. (2009). “Controlling mercury release from source zones to surface water: Initial results of pilot tests at the Y-12 National Security Complex.”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 10.2172/969971.
Southworth, G. R., et al. (2010). “Evaluation of new options for reducing mercury release at the Y-12 National Security Complex.”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 10.2172/1009915.
Treybal, R. E. (1980). Mass-transfer operations, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 275–313.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1994). “Water quality standards handbook.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1995). “Final water quality guidance for the Great Lakes System.”, issued Mar. 23, 1995, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “Identification of approved and disapproved elements of the Great Lakes guidance submissions from the states of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and final rule.”, issued Sept. 5, 2000, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1996). “Sampling ambient water for trace metals at EPA water quality criteria levels.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). “Water quality criterion for the protection of human health: Methylmercury.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). “Method 1631, revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2007). “Treatment technologies for mercury in soil, waste, and water.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2010). “Guidance for implementing the January 2001 methylmercury water quality criterion.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 11 • November 2013
Pages: 1336 - 1342
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 8, 2012
Accepted: Jul 10, 2013
Published online: Jul 12, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.