Technical Papers
Apr 20, 2013

Use of Hydraulic Pressure–Improved Electrokinetic Technique to Enhance the Efficiencies of the Remediation of PCP-Contaminated Soil

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 9

Abstract

This investigation examines use of the electrokinetic (EK) technique in the remediation of low-permeability soil that is contaminated with pentachlorophenol (PCP). The EK system, which includes an electrolyte injection system, improves the efficiency of removal and the degradation of PCP, and performs dechlorination. Experimental results reveal that the species of electrolyte influences the generation of the electric current, the pH of the electrolyte, the pH of the soil, and the rate of electroosmotic flow (EOF). The latter influences the efficiency of remediation of the contaminated soil. Following 72 h of treatment, the overall PCP removal rates that were achieved using NaOH, tap water, and Na2SO4 electrolytes were 81.74, 11.47, and 29.81%, respectively. In this study, the obtained electroosmosis permeability (Keo) values, ranging from 4.52×105 to 6.17×105cm2/Vs, were considerably higher than the values of typical hydraulically induced flow in soil. After 48 (T2) and 72 (T3) h of treatment with NaOH as the electrolyte, the total energy consumption was 492 and 582kWh/m3-soil, respectively. The energy consumption per unit mass of PCP removed revealed that T3 (14kWh/g-PCP) was associated with a more efficient use of energy and the results for T2, T4, and T5 indicate that using NaOH as the electrolyte improved the removal efficiency, saved energy, and reduced the processing time. An evaluation of cost-effectiveness indicates that an EK system that included an electrolyte injection system and used NaOH as the electrolyte provided a favorable removal efficiency and rate of degradation of PCP.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Acar, Y. B., et al. (1995). “Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status.” J. Hazard. Mater., 40(2), 117–137.
Acar, Y. B., and Alshawabkeh, A. N. (1993). “Principles of electrokinetic remediation.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27(13), 2638–2647.
Arcand, Y., Hawari, J., and Guiot, S. R. (1995). “Solubility of pentachlorophenol in aqueous solutions: The pH Effect.” Water Resour., 29(1), 131–136.
Bala, S. H., Popov, B. N., Zheng, G., and White, R. E. (1997). “Mathematical modeling of hexavalent chromium decontamination from low surface charged soils.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 93–107.
Bockris, J. O’M., and Reddy, A. K. N. (1970). Modern electrochemistry, Vol. 2, Plenum, New York.
Boesten, J. J. T. I., and van der Linden, A. M. A. (1991). “Modeling the influence of sorption and transformation on pesticide leaching and persistence.” J. Environ. Qual., 20(2), 425–435.
Bogan, B. W., and Trbovic, V. (2003). “Effect of sequestration on PAH degradability with Fenton’s reagent: Roles of total organic carbon, humin, and soil porosity.” J. Hazard. Mater., 100(1–3), 285–300.
Bonten, L. T., Grotenhuis, T. C., and Rulkens, W. H. (1999). “Enhancement of PAH biodegradation in soil by physicochemical pretreatment.” Chemosphere, 38(15), 3627–3636.
Brewster, J. H. (1954). “Mechanisms of reductions at metal surfaces. I. A general working hypothesis.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76(24), 6361–6363.
Cea, M., Seaman, J. C., Jara, A. A., Fuentes, B., Mora, M. L., and Diez, M. C. (2007). “Adsorption behavior of 2,4-dichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol in an allophanic soil.” Chemosphere, 67(7), 1354–1360.
Cheah, E. P. S., Reible, D. D., Valsaraj, K. T., Constant, W. D., Walsh, B. W., and Thibodeaux, L. J. (1998). “Simulation of soil washing with surfactants.” J. Hazard. Mater., 59(2–3), 107–122.
Chu, W., and Kwan, C. Y. (2003). “Remediation of contaminated soil by a solvent/surfactant system.” Chemosphere, 53(1), 9–15.
Cleveland, C. B. (1996). “Mobility assessment of agrichemicals: current laboratory methodology and suggestions for future directions.” Weed Technol., 10(1), 157–168.
Fisher, B. (1991). “Pentachlorophenol: Toxicology and environmental fate.” J. Pesticide Reform, 11(1), 2–5.
Häggblom, M. M., Nohynek, L. J., and Salkinoja-Salonen, M. S. (1988). “Degradation and O-methylation of chlorinated phenolic compounds by Rhodococcus and Mycobacterium strains.” Appl. Environ. Microb., 54(12), 3043–3052.
Hamed, J. T., and Bhadra, A. (1997). “Influence of current density and pH on electrokinetics.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 279–294.
Hicks, R. E., and Tondorf, S. (1994). “Electrorestoration of metal contaminated soil.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28(12), 2203–2210.
Howard, P. H. (1991). Handbook of environmental fate and exposure data for organic chemicals, Vol. 3: Pesticides, Lewis, New York.
Jonsson, S., Lind, H., Lundstedt, S., Haglund, P., and Tysklind, M. (2010). “Dioxin removal from contaminated soils by ethanol washing.” J. Hazard. Mater., 179(1–3), 393–399.
Ko, S. O., Schlautman, M. A., and Carraway, E. R. (2000). “Cyclodextrin-enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from a model clay soil.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(8), 1535–1541.
Kögel-Knabner, I., and Totsche, K. U. (1998). “Influence of dissolved and colloidal phase humic substances on the transport of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 23(2), 179–185.
Lee, J. K., Park, D., Kim, B. U., Dong, J. I., and Lee, S. (1998). “Remediation of petroleum-contaminated soils by fluidized thermal desorption.” Waste Manage., 18(6–8), 503–507.
Li, T., and Farrell, J. (2000). “Reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene and carbon tetrachloride using iron and palladized-iron cathodes.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(1), 173–197.
Luo, Q. S., Zhang, X. H., Wang, H., and Qian, Y. (2005). “Mobilization of phenol and dichlorophenol in unsaturated soils by non-uniform electrokinetics.” Chemosphere, 59(9), 1289–1298.
Male, K. B., Saby, C., and Luong, J. H. (1998). “Optimization and characterization of a flow injection electrochemical system for pentachlorophenol assay.” Anal. Chem., 70(19), 4134–4139.
Marschner, B. (1998). “DOM-enhanced mobilization of benzo[a]pyrene in a contaminated soil under different chemical conditions.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 23(2), 199–203.
Maturi, K., Reddy, K. R., and Camedelle, C. (2009). “Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mixed contamination in low permeability soil.” Separ. Sci. Technol., 44(10), 2385–2409.
McAlister, K. A., Lee, H., and Trevors, J. T. (1996). “Microbial degradation of pentachlorophenol.” Biodegradation, 7(1), 1–40.
Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York.
Pan, B., Ning, P., and Xing, B. S. (2008). “Part IV—sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 15(7), 554–564.
Pignatello, J. J. (1998). “Soil organic matter as a nanoporous sorbent of organic pollutants.” Adv. Colloid. Interfac., 76–77, 445–467.
Reddy, K. R., Ala, P. R., Sharma, S., and Kumar, N. S. (2006). “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of contaminated manufactured gas plant soil.” Eng. Geol., 85(1–2), 132–146.
Reddy, K. R., and Cameselle, C. (2009). Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Reddy, K. R., Darko-Kagya, K., and Al-Hamdan, A. Z. (2011). “Electrokinetic remediaion of pentachlorophenol contaminated clay soil.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 221(1–4), 35–44.
Reddy, K. R., and Karri, M. R. (2006). “Effect of voltage gradient on integrated electrochemical remediation of contaminant mixtures.” Land Contam. Reclam., 14(3), 685–698.
Reddy, K. R., Maturi, K., and Cameselle, C. (2009). “Sequential electrokinetic remediation of mixed contaminants in low permeability soils.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(10), 989–998.
Rivas, F. J. (2006). “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sorbed on soils: A short review of chemical oxidation based treatments.” J. Hazard. Mater., 138(2), 234–251.
Ross, N. C., Spackman, R. A., Hitchman, M. L., and White, P. C. (1997). “An investigation of the electrochemical reduction of pentachlorophenol with analysis by HPLC.” J. Appl. Electrochem., 27(1), 51–57.
Saichek, R. E., and Reddy, K. R. (2003). “Effect of pH control at the anode for the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil.” Chemosphere, 51(4), 273–287.
Saichek, R. E., and Reddy, K. R. (2005). “Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils: A review.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(2), 115–192.
Shapiro, A. P., and Probstein, R. F. (1993). “Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27(2), 283–291.
Sharma, H. D., and Reddy, K. R. (2004). Geoenvironmental engineering: Site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste containment technologies, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Sposito, G. (1989). The chemistry of the soils, Oxford University Press, New York.
Tam, S. C., Johnson, S. A., and Graham, A. (1999). “The effect of organic structures on pentachlorophenol adsorption on soil.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 115(1–4), 337–346.
Tayal, A. K., Das, L., and Kaur, I. (1999). “Biodegradation of pentachlorophenol (PCP) by white rot fungal strains screened from local sources and its estimation by high-performance liquid chromatography.” Biomed. Chromatogr., 13(3), 220–224.
Virkutyte, J., Sillapää, M., and Latostenmaa, P. (2002). “Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview.” Sci. Total Environ., 289(1–3), 97–121.
Wang, J. M., Marlowe, E. M., Miller-Maier, R. M., and Brusseau, M. L. (1998). “Cyclodextrin enhanced biodegradation of phenanthrene.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(13), 1907–1912.
Weng, C. H., Lin, T. Y., Chu, S. H., and Yuan, C. (2006). “Laboratory-scale evaluation of Cr(VI) removal from clay by electrokinetics incorporated with Fe(0) barrier.” Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage., 10(3), 171–178.
Weng, C. H., and Yuan, C. (2001). “Removal of Cr(III) from clay soils by electrokinetics.” Environ. Geochem. Health, 23(3), 281–285.
Yeung, A. T., and Hsu, C. N. (2005). “Electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated clay.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(2), 298–304.
Zhu, L. Z., Chen, B. L., and Tao, S. (2003). “Interactions of organic contaminants with mineral-adsorbed surfactants.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(17), 4001–4006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 9September 2013
Pages: 1213 - 1221

History

Received: Oct 19, 2012
Accepted: Apr 18, 2013
Published online: Apr 20, 2013
Published in print: Sep 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Sep 20, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jui-Yuan Huang [email protected]
M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung 402, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wing-Ping Liao [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung 402, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]
Siou-Mei Lai [email protected]
Master, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung 402, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung 402, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share