Comparison of Maintenance Cost, Labor Demands, and System Performance for LID and Conventional Stormwater Management
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 7
Abstract
The perception of the maintenance demands of low impact development (LID) systems represents a significant barrier to the acceptance of LID technologies. Despite the increasing use of LID over the past two decades, stormwater managers still have minimal documentation in regard to the frequency, intensity, and costs associated with LID operations and maintenance. Due to increasing requirements for more effective treatment of runoff and the proliferation of total maximum daily load (TMDL) requirements, there is a greater need for more documented maintenance information for planning and implementation of stormwater control measures (SCMs). This study examined seven different types of SCMs for the first 2–4 years of operations and studied maintenance demands in the context of personnel hours, costs, and system pollutant removal. The systems were located at a field facility designed to distribute stormwater in parallel in order to normalize watershed characteristics including pollutant loading, sizing, and rainfall. System maintenance demand was tracked for each system and included materials, labor, activities, maintenance type, and complexity. Annualized maintenance costs ranged from for a vegetated swale to for a wet pond. In terms of mass pollutant load reductions, marginal maintenance costs ranged from TSS removed for porous asphalt, a vegetated swale, bioretention, and a subsurface gravel wetland, to TSS removed for a wet pond, a dry pond, and a sand filter system. When nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus were considered, maintenance costs per gper year removed ranged from reasonable to cost-prohibitive, especially for systems with minimal to no nutrient removal. As such, SCMs designed for targeting these pollutants should be selected carefully. The results of this study indicate that generally, LID systems, as compared to conventional systems, have lower marginal maintenance burdens (as measured by cost and personnel hours) and higher water quality treatment capabilities as a function of pollutant removal performance. Cumulative amortized system maintenance expenditures equal the SCM capital construction costs (in constant dollars) in 5.2 years for wet ponds and in 24.6 years for the porous asphalt system. In general, SCMs with higher percentages of periodic and predictive or proactive maintenance activities have lower maintenance burdens than SCMs with incidences of reactive maintenance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The UNHSC is housed within the Environmental Research Group at the University of New Hampshire (UNH) in Durham, New Hampshire. Funding for the program was and continues to be provided by the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Additional thanks go out to Jeff Gunderson for his contributions and editing.
References
Brown, S. A., Stein, S. M., and Warner, J. C. (1996). “Urban drainage design manual.”, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Technology Applications, Washington, DC.
Debo, T. N., and Reese, A. J. (2002). Municipal stormwater management, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Erickson, A. J., Gulliver, J. S., Kang, J., Weiss, P. T., and Wilson, C. B. (2010). “Maintenance for stormwater treatment practices.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 146(1), 75–82.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). “Best management practices in an ultra-urban setting.” Chapter 3, Stormwater best management practices in an ultra-urban setting: Selection and monitoring, Dept. of Transportation Publishing Warehouse, Landover, MD.
MacMullan, E., and Reich, S. (2007). “The economics of low impact development: A literature review.” ECONorthwest, Eugene, OR.
Narayanan, A., and Pitt, R. (2006). “Costs of urban stormwater control practices.” Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES). (1996). “Stormwater control measures for urban stormwater runoff.” Concord, NH.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). (2003). NewYork State stormwater management design manual, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD.
Powell, L. M., Rohr, E. S., Canes, M. E., Cornet, J. L., Dzuray, E. J., and McDougle, L. M. (2005). “Low-impact development strategies and tools for local governments.”, LMI Governmental Consulting, McLean, VA.
Prince George’s County Department of Environmental Resources (PGDER). (2007). Design manual for use of bioretention in storm water management, Division of Environmental Management, Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, MD.
Roseen, R. M., et al. (2009). “Seasonal performance variations for stormwater management systems in cold climate conditions.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(3), 128–137.
U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL). (2012). “Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index inflation calculator.” 〈http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm〉 (Sep. 1, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1999). “Preliminary data summary of urban stormwater control measures.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2000). “Low impact development (LID) literature review and fact sheets.”, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
UNHSC, Houle, J., Roseen, R., Ballestero, T., and Puls, T. (2012). “UNH Stormwater Center 2012 biennial report.” Univ. of New Hampshire Stormwater Center, Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology, Durham, NH, 〈http://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/docs/UNHSC.2012Report.10.10.12.pdf〉 (Dec. 12, 2012).
Washington State University (WSU) Pierce County Extension. (2007). “Maintenance of low impact development facilities.” Report for Puget Sound Action Team, Tacoma, WA.
Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., and Erickson, A. J. (2005). “The cost and effectiveness of stormwater management practices.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 23, 2012
Accepted: Jan 25, 2013
Published online: Jan 29, 2013
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.