Technical Papers
Jan 29, 2013

Comparison of Maintenance Cost, Labor Demands, and System Performance for LID and Conventional Stormwater Management

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 7

Abstract

The perception of the maintenance demands of low impact development (LID) systems represents a significant barrier to the acceptance of LID technologies. Despite the increasing use of LID over the past two decades, stormwater managers still have minimal documentation in regard to the frequency, intensity, and costs associated with LID operations and maintenance. Due to increasing requirements for more effective treatment of runoff and the proliferation of total maximum daily load (TMDL) requirements, there is a greater need for more documented maintenance information for planning and implementation of stormwater control measures (SCMs). This study examined seven different types of SCMs for the first 2–4 years of operations and studied maintenance demands in the context of personnel hours, costs, and system pollutant removal. The systems were located at a field facility designed to distribute stormwater in parallel in order to normalize watershed characteristics including pollutant loading, sizing, and rainfall. System maintenance demand was tracked for each system and included materials, labor, activities, maintenance type, and complexity. Annualized maintenance costs ranged from $2,280/ha/year for a vegetated swale to $7,830/ha/year for a wet pond. In terms of mass pollutant load reductions, marginal maintenance costs ranged from $4$8/kg/year TSS removed for porous asphalt, a vegetated swale, bioretention, and a subsurface gravel wetland, to $11$21/kg/year TSS removed for a wet pond, a dry pond, and a sand filter system. When nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus were considered, maintenance costs per gper year removed ranged from reasonable to cost-prohibitive, especially for systems with minimal to no nutrient removal. As such, SCMs designed for targeting these pollutants should be selected carefully. The results of this study indicate that generally, LID systems, as compared to conventional systems, have lower marginal maintenance burdens (as measured by cost and personnel hours) and higher water quality treatment capabilities as a function of pollutant removal performance. Cumulative amortized system maintenance expenditures equal the SCM capital construction costs (in constant dollars) in 5.2 years for wet ponds and in 24.6 years for the porous asphalt system. In general, SCMs with higher percentages of periodic and predictive or proactive maintenance activities have lower maintenance burdens than SCMs with incidences of reactive maintenance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The UNHSC is housed within the Environmental Research Group at the University of New Hampshire (UNH) in Durham, New Hampshire. Funding for the program was and continues to be provided by the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Additional thanks go out to Jeff Gunderson for his contributions and editing.

References

Brown, S. A., Stein, S. M., and Warner, J. C. (1996). “Urban drainage design manual.”, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Technology Applications, Washington, DC.
Debo, T. N., and Reese, A. J. (2002). Municipal stormwater management, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Erickson, A. J., Gulliver, J. S., Kang, J., Weiss, P. T., and Wilson, C. B. (2010). “Maintenance for stormwater treatment practices.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 146(1), 75–82.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). “Best management practices in an ultra-urban setting.” Chapter 3, Stormwater best management practices in an ultra-urban setting: Selection and monitoring, Dept. of Transportation Publishing Warehouse, Landover, MD.
MacMullan, E., and Reich, S. (2007). “The economics of low impact development: A literature review.” ECONorthwest, Eugene, OR.
Narayanan, A., and Pitt, R. (2006). “Costs of urban stormwater control practices.” Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES). (1996). “Stormwater control measures for urban stormwater runoff.” Concord, NH.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). (2003). NewYork State stormwater management design manual, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD.
Powell, L. M., Rohr, E. S., Canes, M. E., Cornet, J. L., Dzuray, E. J., and McDougle, L. M. (2005). “Low-impact development strategies and tools for local governments.”, LMI Governmental Consulting, McLean, VA.
Prince George’s County Department of Environmental Resources (PGDER). (2007). Design manual for use of bioretention in storm water management, Division of Environmental Management, Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, MD.
Roseen, R. M., et al. (2009). “Seasonal performance variations for stormwater management systems in cold climate conditions.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(3), 128–137.
U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL). (2012). “Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index inflation calculator.” 〈http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm〉 (Sep. 1, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1999). “Preliminary data summary of urban stormwater control measures.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2000). “Low impact development (LID) literature review and fact sheets.”, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
UNHSC, Houle, J., Roseen, R., Ballestero, T., and Puls, T. (2012). “UNH Stormwater Center 2012 biennial report.” Univ. of New Hampshire Stormwater Center, Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology, Durham, NH, 〈http://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/docs/UNHSC.2012Report.10.10.12.pdf〉 (Dec. 12, 2012).
Washington State University (WSU) Pierce County Extension. (2007). “Maintenance of low impact development facilities.” Report for Puget Sound Action Team, Tacoma, WA.
Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., and Erickson, A. J. (2005). “The cost and effectiveness of stormwater management practices.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 7July 2013
Pages: 932 - 938

History

Received: May 23, 2012
Accepted: Jan 25, 2013
Published online: Jan 29, 2013
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James J. Houle [email protected]
Program Manager, UNH Stormwater Center, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Robert M. Roseen, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
D.WRE
M.ASCE
Associate, Water Resources, Geosyntec Consultants, 289 Great Rd., Acton, MA 01720. E-mail: [email protected]
Thomas P. Ballestero, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering; and Director, UNH Stormwater Center, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824. E-mail: [email protected]
Timothy A. Puls [email protected]
Facility Manager, UNH Stormwater Center, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824. E-mail: [email protected]
James Sherrard Jr.
Hydrologist, Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main St., P.O. Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630; formerly, Engineering Technician, UNH Stormwater Center, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share