Evaluation of Process Uncertainty in Activated Sludge Treatment by Probabilistic Modeling
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 10
Abstract
Simulation-based design and analysis of biotreatment systems depends to a great extent on the accuracy of the model parameters used. In many cases, site-specific parameter estimates are not available and parameter values recommended in the literature are adopted along with a measure of judgment to account for bioprocess uncertainty. To better quantify process certitude associated with this approach and thus provide guidance to process designers lacking site-specific parameter values, stochastic simulations were conducted and the empirical frequency distributions derived from the simulation results were interpreted in terms of process certitude. In general, the simulation results confirmed field experience and current practice in biotreatment from a probabilistic standpoint and provided context in terms of process certitude. The certitude of achieving specific treatment levels increased with sludge age, validating the application of a design safety factor on the minimum solids retention time. The increase in process certitude was not substantial, however, beyond a sludge age of about 4 days for the removal of organic material or about 10 days for the removal of ammonia. Process certitude was also declined when the hydraulic behavior of the treatment system approached complete mixing, which could result from such operational strategies as increasing the recycle ratio or the utilization of step feed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BES-0348161 and by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality under Work Order No. 05-0001MSU-006.
References
Belia, E., Amerlinck, Y., Benedetti, L., Sin, G., Johnson, B., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2008). “Wastewater systems modelling: Dealing with uncertainties.” Proc., 1st IWA/WEF Wastewater Treatment Modelling Seminar, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.
Benedetti, L., Bixio, D., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2006). “Assessment of WWTP design and upgrade options: Balancing costs and risks of standards’ exceedance.” Water Sci. Technol., 54(6–7), 371–378.
Benedetti, L., de Baets, B, Nopens, I, and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2010). “Multi-criteria analysis of wastewater treatment plant design and control scenarios under uncertainty.” Environ. Model. Softw., 25(5), 616–621.
Brun, R., Kuhni, M., Seigrist, H., Gujer, W., and Reichert, P. (2002). “Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets.” Water Res., 36(16), 4113–4127.
Cox, C. D. (2004). “Statistical distribution of uncertainty and variability in activated sludge model parameters.” Water Environ. Res., 76(7), 2672–2685.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16042115
Dey, A., and Magbanua, B. S. Jr. (2010). “Probabilistic modeling of two-stage biological nitrogen removal process: Conditions for enhanced process certitude.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 27(12), 1035–1042.
Flores-Alsina, X., Rodríguez-Roda, I., Sin, G., and Gernaey, K. V. (2008). “Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.” Water Res., 42(17), 4485–4497.
Garman, K. R., Tetreault, M. J., Dold, P. L., Parker, D. S., and Finley, H. R. (1996). “Evaluation of critical activated sludge parameters for dynamic process models.” Proc., 69th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exposition and Conf., Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.
Gillespie, B., and Carberry, J. J. (1966). “Influence of mixing on isothermal reactor yield and adiabatic reactor conversion.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamen., 5(2), 164–171.
GPS-X [Computer software]. (2006). Hydromantis, Hamilton, Canada.
Grady, C. P. L. Jr., Daigger, G. T., and Lim, H. C. (1999). Biological wastewater treatment, 2nd Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York.
Henze, M., Grady, C. P. L. Jr., Gujer, W., Marais, G. V. R., and Matsuo, T. (1987a). “Activated sludge model No. 1.”, International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control, London.
Henze, M., Grady, C. P. L. Jr., Gujer, W., Marais, G. V. R., and Matsuo, T. (1987b). “A general model for single-sludge wastewater systems.” Water Res., 21(5), 505–515.
Kappeler, J., and Gujer, W. (1992). “Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modeling.” Water Sci. Technol., 25(6), 125–139http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/sww/publikationen/1992.
Magbanua, B. S. Jr., and Bowers, A. R. (1998). “Effect of recycle and axial mixing on microbial selection in activated sludge.” J. Environ. Eng., 124(10), 970–978.
Martin, C., Eguinoa, I., Mcintyre, N. R., García-Sanz, M., and Ayesa, E. (2007). “ARMA models for uncertainty assessment of time series data: Application to Galindo-Bilbao WWTP.” Proc., 7th Int. IWA Symp. on Systems Analysis and Integrated Assessment in Water Management, International Water Association, London.
Neumann, M. B., von Gunten, U., and Gujer, W. (2007). “Uncertainty in prediction of disinfection performance.” Water Res., 41(11), 2371–2378.
Petersen, B., Gernaey, A. K., Henze, M., and Vanrolleghem, P. (2002). “Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal-industrial wastewater treatment plant.” J. Hydroinf., 4, 15–38.http://modeleau.fsg.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/modeleau/documents/Publications/pvr365.pdf
Refsgaard, J. C., Van Der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007). “Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process—a framework and guidance.” Environ. Modell. Softw., 22(11), 1543–1556.
Reichert, P., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2001). “Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the River Water Quality Model No. 1 (RWQM1).” Water Sci. Technol., 43(7), 329–338.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11385865
Rittman, B. E., and Macarty, P. L. (2001). “Environmental biotechnology.” Principles and applications, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
Rousseau, D., et al. (2001). “Development of a risk assessment based technique for design/retrofitting of WWTPs.” Water Sci. Technol., 43(7), 287–294.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11385859
Siegrist, H., and Tschui, M. (1992). “Interpretation of experimental data with regard to the activated sludge model No. 1 and calibration of the model for municipal wastewater treatment plants.” Water Sci. Technol., 25(6), 167–183.http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/sww/publikationen/1992
Sin, G., De Pauw, D. J. W., Weijers, S., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2008). “An efficient approach to automate the manual trial and error calibration of activated sludge models.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 100(3), 516–528.
Sin, G., Gernaey, K. V., Neumann, M. B., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., and Gujer, W. (2009). “Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: A critical discussion using an example from design.” Water Res., 43(11), 2894–2906.
Sin, G., Gernaey, K. V., Neumann, M. B., van Loosdrecht, M. C., and Gujer, W. (2011). “Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: Prioritizing sources of uncertainty.” Water Res., 45(2), 639–651.
Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., and Stensel, H. D. (2002). Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, 4th Ed., Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 10 • October 2012
Pages: 1040 - 1047
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 7, 2011
Accepted: Mar 15, 2012
Published online: Sep 14, 2012
Published in print: Oct 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.