Start-Up Performance Evaluation of Submerged Membrane Bioreactors Using Conventional Activated Sludge Process and Modified Luzack-Ettinger Process
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 9
Abstract
The rising trend of converting conventional activated sludge processes to membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes for water reuse requires studying the start-up performance of bioreactors, during which mixed liquid suspended solids concentrations increase significantly. One conventional activated sludge MBR (CAS-MBR) and one modified Luzack-Ettinger (MLE) type MBR (MLE-MBR) with mixed liquor recirculation were evaluated for their performance on organic and nutrient removal, membrane fouling, biomass characteristics, and bacterial activities during the start-up period. The two bench-scale MBRs had identical reactor volume (7.2 L) and were operated under continuous flow conditions with no sludge wasting during the start-up operation. It took approximately 130 days for the MBR biomass concentrations to increase from initial 2,500 mg biomass to a final concentration of with net specific biomass growth rates of and for the CAS-MBR and MLE-MBR, respectively. The total nitrogen removal efficiency of the MLE-MBR was 73%, higher than that of the CAS-MBR (44%), whereas both MBRs had excellent organic removal () soon after the start-up operation. Because of sequencing anoxic and aerobic operations, the biomass of the MLE -MBR exhibited higher heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration activities and better sludge settling than that of the CAS-MBR. Furthermore, the MLE-MBR experienced less membrane fouling than the conventional MBR. Results of the start-up performance suggest alternating anoxic/aerobic MBR operations improve wastewater nutrient removal, increase bacterial activities, and reduce membrane fouling.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ahmed, Z., Cho, J., Lim, B. R., Song, K. G., and Ahn, K. H. (2007). “Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci., 287(2), 211–218.
Al-Malack, M. H. (2006). “Determination of biokinetic coefficients of an immersed membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci., 271(1–2), 47–58.
American Public Health Association (APHA). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Washington, D.C.
An, Y., Yang, F., Wong, F. S., and Chua, H. C. (2009). “Effect of recirculation ratio on simultaneous methanogenesis and nitrogen removal using a combined up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket-membrane bioreactor.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 26(6), 1047–1053.
Barker, D. J., and Stuckey, D. C. (1999). “A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems.” Water Res., 33(14), 3063–3082.
Bekir, C. E., Ong, S. K., Arslankaya, E., and Brown, P. (2008). “Comparison of recirculation configurations for biological nutrient removal in a membrane bioreactor.” Water Res., 42(6–7), 1651–1663.
Bekir, C. E., Ong, S. K., Arslankaya, E., and Lee, Y. W. (2010). “Impact of solids residence time on biological nutrient removal performance of membrane bioreactor.” Water Res., 44(10), 3192–3202.
Brannock, M. W. D., Wang, Y., and Leslie, G. (2010). “Evaluation of full-scale membrane bioreactor mixing performance and the effect of membrane configuration.” J. Membr. Sci., 350(1–2), 101–108.
Drews, A. (2010). “Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterization, contradictions, cause and cures.” J. Membr. Sci., 363(1–2), 1–28.
Dytczak, M. A., Londry, K. L., and Oleszkiewicz, J. A. (2008). “Nitrifying genera in activated sludge may influence nitrification rates.” Water Environ. Res., 80(5), 388–396.
Fenu, A.,et al. (2010). “Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: A critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.” Water Res. 44(15), 4272–4294.
Grady, C. P. L., Daigger, G. T., and Lim, H. C. (1999). Biological wastewater treatment, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Hu, Z., Chandran, K., Grasso, D., and Smets, B. F. (2002). “Effect of nickel and cadmium speciation on nitrification inhibition.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(14), 3074–3078.
Hwang, B. K.,et al. (2008). “Correlating TMP increases with microbial characteristics in the bio-cake on the membrane surface in a membrane bioreactor.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(11), 3963–3968.
Iversen, V.,et al. (2009). “Fouling mitigation through flocculants and adsorbents addition in membrane bioreactors: Comparing lab and pilot studies.” J. Membr. Sci., 345(1–2), 21–30.
Jiang, T.,et al. (2010). “Characterization of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors.” Environ. Sci. Tehcnol., 44(17), 6642–6648.
Jin, L., Ong, S. L., and Ng, H. Y. (2010). “Comparison of fouling characteristics in different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors.” Water Res., 44(20), 5907–5918.
Khongnakorn, W., Wisniewski, C., Pottier, L., and Vachoud, L. (2007). “Physical properties of activated sludge in a submerged membrane bioreactor and relation with membrane fouling.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 55(1), 125–131.
Kimura, K., Naruse, T., and Watanabe, Y. (2009). “Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.” Water Res., 43(4), 1033–1039.
Kiser, M. A., Oppenheimer, J., DeCarolis, J., Hirani, Z. M., and Rittmann, B. E. (2010). “Quantitatively understanding the performance of membrane bioreactors.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 45(7), 1003–1013.
Laera, G., Giordano, C., Pollice, A., Saturno, D., and Mininni, G. (2007). “Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times.” Water Res., 41(18), 4197–4203.
Liang, Z., Das, A., Beerman, D., and Hu, Z. (2010). “Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.” Water Res., 44(11), 3313–3320.
Lim, A. L., and Bai, R. (2003). “Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater.” J. Membr. Sci., 216(1–2), 279–290.
Ma, G. (1999). “The kinetics, biochemical patterns, and microbial ecology in multiredox (anoxic, microaerobic, aerobic) activated sludge systems treating BTX containing wastewater.” Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Masse, A., Sperandio, M., and Cabassud, C. (2006). “Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.” Water Res., 40(12), 2405–2415.
Meng, F., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Li, Y., Xiao, J., and Zhang, X. (2006). “Effect of filamentous bacteria on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci., 272(1–2), 161–168.
Meng, F., Chae, S. R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shin, H. S., and Yang, F. (2009). “Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material.” Water Res., 43(6), 1489–1512.
Meng, F., Liao, B., Liang, S., Yang, F., Zhang, H., and Song, L. (2010). “Morphological visualization, componential characterization and microbiological identification of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs).” J. Membr. Sci., 361(1–2), 1–14.
Menniti, A., and Morgenroth, E. (2010). “Mechanisms of SMP production in membrane bioreactors: Choosing an appropriate mathematical model structure.” Water Res., 44(18), 5240–5251.
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., and Stensel, H. D. (2003). Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Ng, H. Y., and Hermanowicz, S. W. (2005). “Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: Performance and biomass characteristics.” Water Res., 39(6), 981–992.
Okamura, D., Mori, Y., Hashimoto, T., and Hori, K. (2010). “Effects of microbial degradation of biofoulants on microfiltration membrane performance in a membrane bioreactor.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(22), 8644–8648.
Pan, J. R., Su, Y. C., Huang, C., and Lee, H. C. (2010). “Effect of sludge characteristics on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors.” J. Membr. Sci., 349(1–2), 287–294.
Pollice, A., Laera, G., Saturno, D., and Giordano, C. (2008). “Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage.” J. Membr. Sci., 317(1–2), 65–70.
Remy, M., van der Marel, P., Zwijnenburg, A., Rulkens, W., and Temmink, H. (2009). “Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors.” Water Res., 43(2), 345–350.
Rosenberger, S., Kruger, U., Witzig, R., Manz, W., Szewzyk, U., and Kraume, M. (2002). “Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water.” Water Res., 36(2), 413–420.
Rosenberger, S., Evenblij, H., Te Poele, S., Wintgens, T., and Laabs, C. (2005). “The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge processes—Six case studies of different European research groups.” J. Membr. Sci., 263(1–2), 113–126.
Rosenberger, S.,et al. (2006). “Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.” Water Res., 40(4), 710–720.
Sun, D. D., Loong, K. S., Teck, H. C., and Leckie, J. O. (2007a). “Impact of prolonged sludge retention time on the performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor.” Desalination, 208(1–3), 101–112.
Sun, Y., Wang, Y., and X., H. (2007b). “Relationship between sludge settleability and membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor.” Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. Chin., 1(2), 221–225.
Tan, T. W., and Ng, H. Y. (2008). “Influence of mixed liquor recycle ratio and dissolved oxygen on performance of pre-denitrification submerged membrane bioreactors.” Water Res., 42(4–5), 1122–1132.
Teck, H. C., Loong, K. S., Sun, D. D., and Leckie, J. O. (2009). “Influence of a prolonged solid retention time environment on nitrification/denitrification and sludge production in a submerged membrane bioreactor.” Desalination, 245(1–3), 28–43.
Trussell, R. S., Merlo, R. P., Hermanowicz, S. W., and Jenkins, D. (2007). “Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations.” Water Res., 41(5), 947–958.
Wu, J., Le-Clech, P., Stuetz, R. M., Fane, A. G., and Chen, V. (2008). “Novel filtration mode for fouling limitation in membrane bioreactors.” Water Res., 42(14), 3677–3684.
Zarragoitia-Gonzalez, A., Schetrite, S., Alliet, M., Jauregui-Haza, U., and Albasi, C. (2008). “Modelling of submerged membrane bioreactor: Conceptual study about link between activated sludge biokinetics, aeration and fouling process.” J. Membr. Sci., 325(2), 612–624.
Zhang, J., Chua, H. C., Zhou, J., and Fane, A. G. (2006). “Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors.” J. Membr. Sci., 284(1–2), 54–66.
Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Liu, Y., and Fane, A. G. (2010). “A comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors.” Water Res., 44(18), 5407–5413.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 9 • September 2012
Pages: 932 - 939
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 22, 2011
Accepted: Feb 23, 2012
Published online: Feb 25, 2012
Published in print: Sep 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.