TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 10, 2011

Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 9

Abstract

In response to water quality and quantity issues within the Stroubles Creek watershed in Blacksburg, Virginia, a retrofit bioretention cell (BRC) was installed to collect and treat runoff from an existing parking lot. The BRC was completed in July 2007, and 28 precipitation events were monitored between October 2007 and June 2008. For each storm, inflow and outflow flow-weighted composite samples were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. The inflow and outflow concentrations and loads, as well as total inflow and outflow volumes and peak flow rates, were analyzed to evaluate BRC efficiency. Overall, the BRC successfully reduced flow volumes and peak flow rates leaving the parking lot by 97 and 99%, respectively. Cumulative mass reductions for sediment, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus all exceeded 99% by mass. The findings of this study have significant implications for areas with karst geology: (1) current design recommendations of lining the bottom of BRCs with clay may not be sufficient to prevent large amounts of water from infiltrating into surrounding soils; and (2) in areas with significant elevation changes, designing BRCs deeper than the typical 0.6–1.2 m increases the feasibility of retrofits and provides substantial water quality and quantity benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation for funding this study and the Town of Blacksburg, Virginia for their assistance in planning, designing, and constructing the best management practices used for this research. Additional recognition goes to Ms. Laura Teany and Mr. Matt Stolte for their support and guidance during the course of this study.

References

Biggs, T. W., Dunne, T., and Martinelli, L. A. (2004). “Natural controls and human impacts on stream nutrient concentrations in a deforested region of the Brazilian Amazon basin.” Biogeochemistry, 68(2), 227–257.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2011). “Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of under-sized bioretention cells.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 137(3), 132–143.
Colosimo, M. F., and Wilcock, P. R. (2007). “Alluvial sedimentation and erosion in an urbanizing watershed, Gwynn Falls, Maryland.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(2), 499–521.
Dalgaard, P. (2002). Introductory statistics with R, Springer, New York.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Dietz, M. E. (2007). “Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 186(1–4), 351–363.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 167(1–4), 123–138.
Glass, C., and Bissouma, S. (2005). “Evaluation of a parking lot bioretention cell for removal of stormwater pollutants.” Ecosystems and sustainable development V, WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 81, 699–708.
Hach Company. (2002). Water analysis handbook, 4th Ed., Loveland, CO, 10071.
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2009). “Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 365(3-4), 310–321.
Hsieh, C., and Davis, A. P. (2005). “Multiple-event study of bioretention for treatment of urban stormwater runoff.” Water Sci. Technol., 51(3–4), 177–181.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Hunt, W. F., and Lord, W. G. (2006). Bioretention performance, design, construction and maintenance, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC.
Meyer, S. C. (2004). “Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA.” Hydrogeol. J., 13(5–6), 871–885.
National Climate Data Center (NCDC). (2008). “Climate normals.” 〈http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/climatenormals/clim20/va/440766.pdf〉 (Dec. 15, 2008).
Page, D. L. (1982). Methods of soil analysis, part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd Ed., American Society of Agronomy/Soil Science of America, Madison, WI.
Prince George’s County. (1999). Low-impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach, Maryland Dept. of Environmental Resources, Largo, MD.
Schoonover, J. E., and Lockaby, B. G. (2006). “Land cover impacts on stream nutrients and fecal coliform in the lower Piedmont of West Georgia.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 331(3–4), 371–382.
Technology Acceptance Reciprocity Partnership (TARP). (2003). Protocol for stormwater best management practice demonstrations, Technology Acceptance Reciprocity Partnership: California, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Tiquia, S. M., Lloyd, J., Herms, D. A., Hoitink, H. A. J., and Michel, F. C. (2002). “Effects of mulching and fertilization on soil nutrients, microbial activity and rhizosphere bacterial community structure determined by analysis of TRFLPs of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes.” Appl. Soil Ecol., 21(1), 31–48.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). Protocol urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring: A guidance manual for meeting the national stormwater BMP database requirements, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VADCR). (1999). Virginia stormwater management handbook, Richmond, VA.
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VADCR). (2005). Virginia nutrient management standards and criteria, Richmond, VA.
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). (2007). “Drought status report—October 22, 2007.” Drought Monitoring Task Force, 〈http://www.deq.virginia.gov/export/sites/default/waterresources/documents/DMTFReportOct07.pdf〉 (Jan. 8, 2009).
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). (2008). “Drought status report—March 25, 2008.” Drought Monitoring Task Force, 〈http://www.deq.virginia.gov/export/sites/default/waterresources/documents/DMTFReportMar08-revised.pdf〉 (Jan. 8, 2009).
Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., and Erickson, A. J. (2007). “Cost and pollutant removal of storm-water treatment practices.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 133(3), 218–229.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137Issue 9September 2011
Pages: 800 - 808

History

Received: Dec 26, 2009
Accepted: Mar 8, 2011
Published online: Mar 10, 2011
Published in print: Sep 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

K. M. DeBusk, M.ASCE [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Biological Systems Engineering (0303), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
T. M. Wynn, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Biological Systems Engineering (0303), 302 Seitz Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share