Understanding the Mixing Pattern in an Anaerobic Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactor: Effect of Liquid Recirculation
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 6
Abstract
An anaerobic expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor is considered to be an improvement over upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors owing to the former’s ability to recycle the effluent and its modified reactor geometry. However, the mixing pattern in EGSB reactors, which greatly influences the design and the performance of this reactor, has not yet been studied in detail. In this research, the mixing pattern in a lab-scale EGSB reactor treating a synthetic dye wastewater was studied using lithium chloride as a tracer. The tracer exit curve indicated a complete-mix behavior. A simulation study was conducted on identical reactors using conductivity probes, inserted through the sample ports along the height of the reactors and connected to a data acquisition system. The reactors were operated at three different hydraulic retention times (3.3, 5.5, and 9 h) and at four different upflow liquid velocities (1.10, 2.66, 5.33, and 8.68 m/h). The data showed the existence of a plug-flow regime in the basin at lower upflow liquid velocities although the tracer response curves resemble complete-mix behavior. With increasing upflow liquid velocity the flow pattern in the basin deviates from a plug-flow pattern and approaches a complete-mix condition. The EGSB reactor can be modeled as a plug-flow reactor with recycle and dead space, and with a large vessel dispersion number .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada—Discovery Grant of the second writer. The writers would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Dennis Connor, Dr. Tom Al, and Mr. Steven Cogswell of the University of New Brunswick for their technical support.
References
Bae, B., and Shin, H. (1998). “Performance of an inner tube-type gas-solid separator device in a UASB reactor.” Bioresour. Technol., 63(1), 23–27.
Bhattacharyya, D. (2009). “Degradation of dyes and color removal in advanced bioreactor systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., Canada.
Bhattacharyya, D., Harmita, H., Singh, K. S., and Wilson, B. G. (2009). “Fluidization in an anaerobic EGSB reactor: Analysis of primary wakes and modeling of sludge blanket.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(8), 700–707.
Bolle, W. L., van Breugel, J., van Eybergen, G. C., Kossen, N. W. F., and Zoetemeyer, R. J. (1986). “Modeling the liquid flow in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 28(11), 1615–1620.
Heertjes, P. M., Kuijvenhoven, L. J., and van der Meer, R. R. (1982). “Fluid-flow pattern in upflow reactors for anaerobic treatment of beet sugar factory wastewater.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 24(2), 443–459.
Heertjes, P. M., and van der Meer, R. R. (1978). “Dynamics of liquid flow in an up-flow reactor used for anaerobic treatment of wastewater.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 20(10), 1577–1594.
Kalyuzhnyi, S., Fedorovich, V., Lens, P., Pol, L. H., and Lettinga, G. (1998). “Mathematical modelling as a tool to study population dynamics between sulfate reducing and methanogenic bacteria.” Biodegradation, 9(3–4), 187–199.
Levenspiel, O. (1999a). “The dispersion model.” Chemical reaction engineering, Wiley, New York, 293–320.
Levenspiel, O. (1999b). Chemical reaction engineering, Wiley, New York.
Lou, S. J., Tartakovsky, B., Zeng, Y., Wu, P., and Guiot, S. R. (2006). “Fluorescence-based monitoring of tracer and substrate distribution in an UASB reactor.” Chemosphere, 65(7), 1212–1220.
Monteith, H. D., and Stephenson, J. P. (1981). “Mixing efficiencies in full-scale anaerobic digesters by tracer methods.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 53(1), 78–84.
Murphy, K. L. (1971). “Significance of flow patterns and mixing in biological waste treatment.” Biological waste treatment, R. P. Canale, ed., Interscience, New York, 35–50.
Ojha, C. S. P., and Singh, R. P. (2002). “Flow distribution parameters in relation to flow resistance in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor system.” J. Environ. Eng., 128(2), 196–200.
Pena, M. R., Mara, D. D., and Avella, G. P. (2006). “Dispersion and treatment performance analysis of an UASB reactor under different hydraulic loading rates.” Water Res., 40(3), 445–452.
Singh, K. S., Viraraghavan, T., and Bhattacharyya, D. (2006). “Sludge blanket height and flow pattern in UASB reactors: Temperature effects.” J. Environ. Eng., 132(8), 895–900.
Singhal, A., Gomes, J., Praveen, V. V., and Ramachandran, K. B. (1998). “Axial dispersion model for upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.” Biotechnol. Prog., 14(4), 645–648.
Smith, L. C., Elliot, D. J., and James, A. (1996). “Mixing in upflow anaerobic filters and its influence on performance and scale-up.” Water Res., 30(12), 3061–3073.
Thanos, A. M., Bellos, G. D., Galtier, P. A., and Papayannakos, N. G. (2003). “Bed length effect on the liquid phase non-idealities and holdup in pilot scale upflow reactors.” Catal. Today, 79(1–4), 235–240.
Wu, M. M., and Hickey, R. F. (1997). “Dynamic model for UASB reactor including reactor hydraulics, reaction, and diffusion.” J. Environ. Eng., 123(3), 244–252.
Zeng, Y., Mu, S. J., Lou, S. J., Tartakovsky, B., Guiot, S. R., and Wu, P. (2005). “Hydraulic modeling and axial dispersion analysis of UASB reactor.” Biochem. Eng. J., 25(2), 113–123.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136 • Issue 6 • June 2010
Pages: 576 - 584
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 7, 2008
Accepted: Oct 23, 2009
Published online: Oct 31, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.