TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 13, 2009

Predictive Uncertainty in Water-Quality Modeling

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

A general and integrated approach to parameter identification, model calibration, and estimation of predictive uncertainty in water-quality models is proposed and validated. The proposed approach determines the maximal conditional likelihood functions of each of the model parameters using a transformation that forces the model errors to be normally distributed, with predictive uncertainty characterized by random normally distributed and homoscedastic model errors in the transform space. The proposed approach is demonstrated using a watershed-scale model to predict the fecal coliform levels in a third-order stream within the Little River Experimental Watershed in Georgia. Maximal conditional likelihood functions were identified for all parameters in the log, square root, and no-transformation cases. The key results are: (1) the number of sensitive parameters and the optimal parameter values can depend on the transformation; (2) only in the case of the log-transformation are the errors normally distributed and consistent with the assumed Gaussian likelihood function; (3) the standard error in the model is least for the no-transform case and highest for the log-transform case; and (4) the observed model errors are most predictable using the log-transform and least predictable using the no-transform approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Stimulating discussions with Victor Pestien in the Department of Mathematics helped crystallize some of the ideas presented here. The contributions of David Bosch (USDA) and Paige Gay (University of Georgia) in providing data on the Little River Watershed were much appreciated.

References

Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrolog. Process., 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K. J., Smith, P., and Freer, J. (2007). “Comment on ‘Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology’ by Pietro Mantovan and Ezio Todini.” J. Hydrol., 338, 315–318.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jr., and Donigian, A. S., Jr. (2001). “Hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF): Users’ manual for release 12.” Technical Rep. Prepared for National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
Bosch, D. D., and Sheridan, J. M. (2007). “Stream discharge database, Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia, United States.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09473.
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1986). “An analysis of transformations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.), 26, 211–246.
D’Agostino, R. B., and Stevens, M. A. (1986). Goodness-of-fit techniques, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Engeland, K., Xu, C. -Y., and Gottschalk, L. (2005). “Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(1), 45–63.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources. (2002). “Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for fecal coliform in 303(d) listed streams in the Oconee River Basin.” Technical Rep. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, by Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta.
Hantush, M. M., and Kalin, L. (2008). “Stochastic residual-error analysis for estimating hydrologic model predictive uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(7), 585–596.
Knuth, D. E. (1981). The art of computer programming. Volume 2: Seminumerical algorithms, 2nd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Lenhart, T., Eckhardt, K., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H. -G. (2002). “Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 27, 645–654.
Lumb, A. M., McCammon, R. B., and Kittle, J. L. (1994). “Users’ manual for an expert system (HSPEXP) for calibration on the hydrological simulation program-Fortran.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. No. 94-4168, United States Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. (2006). “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 330, 368–381.
Mantovan, P., Todini, E., and Martina, M. L. V. (2007). “Reply to comment by Keith Beven, Paul Smith and Jim Freer on ‘Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.’” J. Hydrol., 338, 319–324.
McIntyre, N., Jackson, B., Wade, A. J., Butterfield, D., and Wheater, H. S. (2005). “Sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale nitrogen model.” J. Hydrol., 315, 71–92.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., and King, K. W. (2002). “Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2000.” Technical Rep. No. 02-01, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, Tex.
Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sincock, A. M., Wheater, H. S., and Whitehead, P. G. (2003). “Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a river water quality model under unsteady flow conditions.” J. Hydrol., 277, 214–229.
Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1995). “Model calibration.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Englewood, Colo.
Stow, C. A., et al. (2007). “Approaches to evaluate water quality model parameter uncertainty for adaptive TMDL implementation.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1499–1507.
Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters.” Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1201.
Xu, C. -Y. (2001). “Statistical analysis of parameters and residuals of a conceptual water balance model: Methodology and case study.” Water Resour. Manage., 15, 75–92.
Zheng, Y., and Keller, A. A. (2006). “Understanding parameter sensitivity and its management implications in watershed-scale water quality monitoring.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W05402.
Zheng, Y., and Keller, A. A. (2007a). “Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management. 1: Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W08407.
Zheng, Y., and Keller, A. A. (2007b). “Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management. 2: Management objectives constrained analysis of uncertainty (MOCAU).” Water Resour. Res., 43, W08408.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 1315 - 1325

History

Received: Jul 8, 2008
Accepted: May 6, 2009
Published online: May 13, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David A. Chin, F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share