OTHER TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 21, 2009

Optimizing the Remedial Process at a Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Site Using a Three-Tier Approach

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 11

Abstract

Pump and treat (P&T) system is widely used to remove contaminants in groundwater and maintain hydraulic capture of contaminants. A P&T system usually becomes costly in removing contaminant mass after operation for a period of time because the cost of pumping stays high while concentration of contaminants in extracted groundwater decreases significantly over time. However, the P&T system may have to continue operation before contaminants in groundwater reach the cleanup goals. In such cases, the optimization of the existing remedial system and an exit strategy will be necessary and beneficial to all stakeholders. This study examined a P&T system at a remediation site near a coastal wetland. We developed a three-tier approach to optimize the existing remedial system. The remedial process optimization (RPO) was achieved by reducing pump wells and monitoring frequency and developing an exit strategy. In the first tier, we used descriptive trend plot, trend factor analysis, and autocorrelation analysis to capture the temporal trend in the monitoring data and determine optimum sampling frequency; in the second tier, we used multivariate analysis include principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square regression (PLSR) to identify the spatial and temporal pattern in the monitoring data, and to construct a statistical model to predict future contaminant levels; in the third tier, we used MODFLOW, a USGS developed finite-difference flow module for aquifer simulation, and interpretation of the hydraulic capture of extraction wells and contaminant migration. Based on the tiered analysis, we designed an improved groundwater monitoring program and pumping strategy. The RPO is expected to save 68% groundwater monitoring cost, and 30% P&T operation and maintenance (O&M) cost.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank the four anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that have improved the quality of the paper. The writers also express their thanks to Dr. Jian Luo of Georgia Institute of Technology for his advice in groundwater modeling, and Ms. Amy Gignac, Mr. Andrew Crisp, Mr. Steve Rossello, and Mr. Robert Gray for their support when conducting work at the project site.

References

Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M., Pinder, G. F., and Wood, E. F. (1988). “Contaminated groundwater remediation design using three-tier simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 1. Model development.” Water Resour. Res., 24, 431–441.
Barcelona, M. J., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Schock, M. R. (1989). “Network design factors for assessing temporal variability in groundwater quality.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 12, 149–179.
Chadalavada, S., and Datta, B. (2008). “Dynamic optimal monitoring network design for transient transport of pollutants in groundwater aquifers.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(6).
Efron, B., and Gong, G. (1983). “A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation.” Am. Stat., 37, 36.
Garthwaite, P. H. (1994). “An interpretation of partial least-squares.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89, 122.
Huang, C., and Mayer, A. S. (1997). “Pump and treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables.” Water Resour. Res., 33, 1001–1012.
Hudak, P. F., and Loaiciga, H. A. (1993). “An optimization method for monitoring network design in multilayered groundwater flow systems.” Water Resour. Res., 29(8), 2835–2845.
Johnson, M. V., Tuckfield, R. R., Ridley, N. M., and Anderson, R. A. (1995). “Reducing the sampling frequency of groundwater monitoring wells.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 30(1), 355–358.
Kim, K. -H., and Lee, K. -K. (2007). “Optimization of groundwater-monitoring networks for identification of the distribution of a contaminant plume.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 21(6), 785.
Ko, N., Lee, K., and Kyun, Y. (2005). “Optimal groundwater remediation design of a pump and treat system considering clean-up time.” Geosci. J., 9(1), 23–31.
Mahar, P. S., and Datta, B. (1997). “Optimal monitoring network and ground-water-pollution source identification.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 123(4), 199.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model.” Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Book 6, Chap. A1.
McIntosh, A. R., and Lobaugh, N. J. (2004). “Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances.” Neuroimage, 23, S250.
National Research Council (NRC). (1994). Alternatives for groundwater cleanup, National Academy, Washington, D.C.
Pollard, S. J. T., Lythgo, M., and Duarte-Davidson, R. (2001). The extent of contaminated land: Problems and the scientific response, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Pollock, D. W. (1994). User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, U.S. Geological Survey, USGS Open File Report, 94–464.
Stewartoaten, A., Murdoch, W. W., and Parker, K. R. (1986). “Environmental impact assessment pseudoreplication in time.” Ecology, 67, 929.
U.S. EPA. (1989). “Sampling frequency for groundwater quality monitoring.” EPA/600/S4-89/032, Washington D.C.
U.S. EPA. (1997). “Evaluation of demonstrated and emerging technologies for the treatment and clean up of contaminated land and groundwater.” EPA 542-C-99-002, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2002). “Pilot project to optimize superfund-financed pump and treat systems: summary report and lessons learned.” EPA 542-R-02-008a, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2004). “Cleaning up the nation's waste sites: Markets and technology trends 2004 edition.” EPA 542-R-04-015, Washington, D.C.
Wold, S., Sjostrom, M., and Eriksson, L. (2001). “PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 58, 109.
Yeh, M. -S., Yu-Pin L., and Chang, L. -C. (2006). “Designing an optimal multivariate geostatistical groundwater quality monitoring network using factorial kriging and genetic algorithms.” Geo, 50(1), 101.
Zheng, C., and Wang, P. P. (2002). “A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design.” Ground Water, 40, 258–265.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135Issue 11November 2009
Pages: 1171 - 1180

History

Received: Nov 8, 2008
Accepted: Mar 19, 2009
Published online: Mar 21, 2009
Published in print: Nov 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Deyi Hou
Project Engineer, Parsons Corporation, 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94596.
Rong-Jin Leu
Supervising Engineer, Parsons Corporation, 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94596.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share