TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 15, 2009

Composition of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States and Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Methane Yield

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 10

Abstract

Eleven statewide waste characterization studies were compared to assess variation in the quantity and composition of waste after separation of recyclable and compostable materials, i.e., discarded waste. These data were also used to assess the impact of varying composition on sequestered carbon and methane yield. Inconsistencies in the designation of waste component categories and definitions were the primary differences between study methodologies; however, sampling methodologies were consistent with recommended protocols. The average municipal solid waste (MSW) discard rate based on the statewide studies was 1.90kgMSWperson1day1 , which was within the range of two national estimates: 2.35 and 1.46kgMSWperson1day1 . Dominant components in MSW discards were similar between studies. Organics (food waste, yard trimmings), paper, and plastic components averaged 23.6±4.9% , 28.5±6.5% , and 10.6±3.0% of discarded MSW, respectively. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste was 20.2±9.7% of total solid waste discards (i.e., MSW plus C&D). Based on average statewide waste composition data, a carbon sequestration factor (CSF) for MSW of 0.13 kg C dry kgMSW1 was calculated. For C&D waste, a CSF of 0.14 kg C dry kg C and D waste1 was estimated. Ultimate methane yields (Lo) of 59.1 and 63.9m3 CH4 wet Mg refuse1 were computed using EPA and state characterization study data, respectively, and were lower than AP-42 guidelines. Recycling, combustion, and other management practices at the local level could significantly impact CSF and (Lo) estimates, which are sensitive to the relative fraction of organic components in discarded MSW and C&D waste.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge Waste Management, Inc. for their support. Bryan Staley’s work was partially funded through a scholarship from the Environmental Research and Education Foundation.

References

Abu Qdais, H. A., Hamoda, M. F., and Newham, J. (1997). “Analysis of residential solid waste at generation sites.” Waste Manage. Res., 15, 395–406.
Aery, M. J., Baetz, B. W., Macdonald, P. D. M., and Byer, P. H. (1993). “Use of mixed probability distributions for the analysis of solid waste generation data.” Waste Manage. Res., 11, 387–402.
ASTM. (1999). “Standard test method for determination of the composition of unprocessed municipal solid waste.” D 5231-92, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Barlaz, M. A. (1998). “Carbon storage during biodegradation of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfills.” Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 12(2), 373–380.
California Integrated Waste Management Board. (1999). “Statewide waste characterization study.” Rep. No. 340-00-009, California Integrated Waste Mangement Board, Sacramento, Calif., ⟨www.ciwmb.ca.gov/WasteChar/WasteStudies.htm#1999⟩ (July 28, 2005).
California Integrated Waste Management Board. (2004). “Statewide waste characterization study.” Rep. No. 340-04-005, California Integrated Management Board, Sacramento, Calif., ⟨www.ciwmb.ca.gov/WasteChar/DBMain.htm⟩ (Feb. 1, 2008).
Delaware Solid Waste Authority. (2007). “Statewide waste characterization study, 2006–2007.” ⟨www.dswa.com/pdfs/reports/Statewide%20Waste%20Characterization%20Study%202006-2007.pdf⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
Eleazar, W. E., Odle, W. S., Wang, Y., and Barlaz, M. A. (1997). “Biodegradability of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfills.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 911–917.
Fiber Economics Bureau. (2006). “U.S. manufactured fiber, cotton, and wool end use survey.” Fiber Organon, 77(10), 187–204.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. (2002). “Solid waste management in Florida: 2001–2002.” ⟨www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/recycling/pages⟩ (July 28, 2005).
Georgia Department of Community Affairs. (2005). “Georgia statewide waste characterization study.” ⟨www.dca.state.ga.us/development/EnvironmentalManagement /publications/GeorgiaMSWCharacterizationStudy.pdf⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
Goldstein, N., and Madtes, C. (2001). “The state of garbage in America.” BioCycle, 42(12), 42–56.
Iowa Department of Natural Resources. (1998). “Iowa solid waste characterization.” ⟨www.state.ia.us/dnr/organiza/wmad/wmabureau/solidwaste/swcompplanning/documents/SolidWasteCharacterizationStudy.pdf⟩ (Feb. 6, 2008).
Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Waste Management. (2005). “2005 state solid waste management plan.” ⟨www.kdheks.gov/waste/swm_plan/statesw plan05index.pdf⟩ (Aug. 30, 2007).
Leroy, D., Giovannoni, J. M., and Maystre, L. Y. (1992). “Sampling method to determine a household waste composition variance.” Waste Manage. Res., 10, 3–12.
Loughlin, D. H., and Barlaz, M. A. (2006). “Policies for strengthening markets for recyclables: A worldwide perspective.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(4), 287–326.
Martin, J. H., Collins, A. R., and Diener, R. G. (1995). “A sampling protocol for composting, recycling, and re-use of municipal solid waste.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 34, 864–870.
Maystre, L. Y., and Viret, F. (1995). “A goal-oriented characterization of urban waste.” Waste Manage. Res., 13, 207–218.
Minnesota Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board. (2000). “Statewide MSW composition study: A study of discards in the state of Minnesota.” ⟨http://proteus.pca.state.mn.us/oea/policy/wastesort.cfm⟩ (July 28, 2005).
Missouri Department of Natural Resources. (1998). “The Missouri solid waste composition study.” Midwest Assistance Program, Inc., ⟨www.map-inc.org/Publications/Publications/waste_characterization_study.htm⟩ (July 28, 2005).
National Gypsum Company. (2008). “National Gypsum Company: Drywall, cement board, gypsum board,” ⟨www.nationalgypsum.com⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
Newenhouse, S. C., and Schmit, J. T. (2000). “Qualitative methods add value to waste characterization studies.” Waste Manage. Res., 18, 105–114.
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. (2000). “Oregon solid waste composition: 2000.” ⟨www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/solwaste/swrd.html⟩ (July 28, 2005).
Oshins, C., and Block, D. (2000). “Feedstock composition at composting sites.” BioCycle, 41(9), 31–34.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. (2003). “Statewide waste composition study.” ⟨www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/wm/RECYCLE/Waste_Comp/Study.htm⟩ (July 28, 2005).
Reinhart, D. R., and McCauley-Bell, P. (1996). “Methodology for conducting composition study for discarded solid waste.” Rep. No. 96-1, Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, Fla., ⟨www.hinkleycenter.com/publications/discarded_waste_composition_96-1.pdf⟩ (March 29, 2008).
Savage, J. S., and S. T. Demers. (1996). “Composition studies: Get to know your waste.” Waste Age, 26, ⟨http://wasteage.com/mag/waste_composition_studies_know/?smte=wr”⟩.
Simmons, P., Goldstein, N., Kaufman, S. M., Themelis, N. J., and Thompson, J. (2006a). “The state of garbage in America.” Biocycle, 47(4), 26–43.
Simmons, P., Kaufman, S. M., and Themelis, N. J. (2006b). “State of garbage in America recycling data analysis.” Biocycle, 47(10), 21–25.
Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., and Vigil, S. A. (1993). Integrated solid waste management, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). “Population division.” ⟨www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
U.S. EPA. (1999). “Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1998 update.” Rep. No. 530-R-98-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C., ⟨www.epa.gov/garbage/pubs/98charac.pdf⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
U.S. EPA. (2005). “Municipal solid waste in the United States: 2005 facts and figures.” Rep. No. EPA-530-R-06-011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/msw/pubs/mswchar05.pdf⟩ (April 17, 2008).
U.S. EPA. (2006). “Solid waste management and greenhouse gases: A life-cycle assessment of emissions and sinks.” Rep. Prepared for USEPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C., ⟨www.epa.gov/climatechange/wycd/waste/SWMGHGreport.html⟩ (March 29, 2008).
U.S. EPA. (2007). “Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States: Facts and figures for 2006.” Rep. No. EPA-530-F-07-030, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/pubs/msw06.pdf⟩ (Jan. 9, 2008).
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (2003). “Wisconsin statewide waste characterization study.” Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc., ⟨www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/aw/wm/recycle/studies/⟩ (July 28, 2005).
Yu, C., and Maclaren, V. (1995). “A comparison of two waste stream quantification and characterization methodologies.” Waste Manage. Res., 13, 343–361.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135Issue 10October 2009
Pages: 901 - 909

History

Received: May 1, 2008
Accepted: Mar 13, 2009
Published online: Sep 15, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bryan F. Staley [email protected]
Vice President of Environmental Research, Environmental Research and Education Foundation, 901 N. Pitt St., Suite 270, Alexandria, VA 22314. E-mail: [email protected]
Morton A. Barlaz [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share