Technical Papers
May 2, 2022

Demographics as Determinants of Building Occupants’ Indoor Environmental Perceptions: Insights from a Machine Learning Incremental Modeling and Analysis Approach

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 4

Abstract

The relationship between the demographical characteristics of building occupants and their perception of indoor comfort is increasingly being studied. However, the added value from accounting for such characteristics when modeling and predicting occupants’ perceptions remains unclear. An incremental machine learning (ML) modeling and analysis approach is proposed to quantify the influence of four demographical factors (gender, age, nationality, and time lived in the environment) on occupants’ perceptions of their indoor environment conditions. A three-step methodology is presented: (1) data collection through sensors and a questionnaire administered on 206 occupants of academic and office buildings in Abu Dhabi, UAE, (2) development of ML models (i.e., support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boosting) to predict occupants’ perceptions under different scenarios of demographical representation (i.e., from no representation to all demographical parameters included), and (3) analysis of the impact of demographical parameters’ inclusion on the performance of the ML models in terms of predictive accuracy, F1-scores, and computing time. Results confirm that including demographical variables could increase prediction accuracy and F1-scores by approximately 19% and 56%, respectively. However, in some instances, the inclusion of these variables reduced model performance while increasing computing time by as much as 50%. A detailed discussion is presented on the comparative performance of the different tested ML algorithms and the need to strike a balance between increasing model complexity and computational costs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge (ADEK) for their financial support under Grant No. AARE18-063. They also wish to acknowledge the contribution of Khalifa University’s high-performance computing and research computing facilities to the results of this research.

References

Al Horr, Y., M. Arif, M. Katafygiotou, A. Mazroei, A. Kaushik, and E. Elsarrag. 2016. “Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature.” Int. J. Sustainable Built Environ. 5 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006.
Amari, S.-I., and S. Wu. 1999. “Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions.” Neural Networks 12 (6): 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(99)00032-5.
Andargie, M. S., and E. Azar. 2019. “An applied framework to evaluate the impact of indoor office environmental factors on occupants’ comfort and working conditions.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 46 (Apr): 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101447.
Andargie, M. S., M. Touchie, and W. O’Brien. 2019. “A review of factors affecting occupant comfort in multi-unit residential buildings.” Build. Environ. 160 (Aug): 106182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106182.
ASHRAE (American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers). 2017. ANSI/ASHRAE 55-2017 thermal environment conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: ASHRAE.
Awada, M., B. Becerik-Gerber, G. Lucas, and S. C. Roll. 2021. “Associations among home indoor environmental quality factors and worker health while working from home during COVID-19 pandemic.” J. Eng. Sustainable Build. Cities 2 (4): 041001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052822.
Baluja, S., V. O. Mittal, and R. Sukthankar. 2000. “Applying machine learning for high-performance named-entity extraction.” Comput. Intell. 16 (4): 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/0824-7935.00129.
Bergstra, J., D. Yamins, and D. D. Cox. 2013. “Making a science of model search: Hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures.” In Proc., 30th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 115–123. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Bhavsar, H., and A. Ganatra. 2012. “A comparative study of training algorithms for supervised machine learning.” Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. 2 (4): 2231–2307.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Bridge, P. D., and S. S. Sawilowsky. 1999. “Increasing physicians’ awareness of the impact of statistics on research outcomes: Comparative power of the t-test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test in small samples applied research.” J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52 (3): 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00168-1.
Camporeale, E., J. Johnson, and S. Wing. 2018. Machine learning techniques for space weather. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Chaudhuri, T., Y. C. Soh, H. Li, and L. Xie. 2017. “Machine learning based prediction of thermal comfort in buildings of equatorial Singapore.” In Proc., 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), 72–77. New York: IEEE.
Chaudhuri, T., D. Zhai, Y. C. Soh, H. Li, and L. Xie. 2018. “Random forest based thermal comfort prediction from gender-specific physiological parameters using wearable sensing technology.” Energy Build. 166 (May): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.035.
Chen, C.-F., S. Yilmaz, A. L. Pisello, M. De Simone, A. Kim, T. Hong, K. Bandurski, M. V. Bavaresco, P.-L. Liu, and Y. Zhu. 2020. “The impacts of building characteristics, social psychological and cultural factors on indoor environment quality productivity belief.” Build. Environ. 185 (Nov): 107189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107189.
Choi, J., A. Aziz, and V. Loftness. 2010. “Investigation on the impacts of different genders and ages on satisfaction with thermal environments in office buildings.” Build. Environ. 45 (6): 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.004.
Choi, J.-H., and J. Moon. 2017. “Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments.” Build. Environ. 114 (Mar): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.003.
Choi, J.-H., and D. Yeom. 2017. “Study of data-driven thermal sensation prediction model as a function of local body skin temperatures in a built environment.” Build. Environ. 121 (Aug): 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.004.
Choi, J.-H., and D. Yeom. 2019. “Development of the data-driven thermal satisfaction prediction model as a function of human physiological responses in a built environment.” Build. Environ. 150 (Mar): 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.007.
Dinç, P. 2009. “Gender (in) difference in private offices: A holistic approach for assessing satisfaction and personalization.” J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.006.
DiStefano, C., D. Shi, and G. B. Morgan. 2021. “Collapsing categories is often more advantageous than modeling sparse data: Investigations in the CFA framework.” Struct. Equation Modell. Multidiscip. J. 28 (2): 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1803073.
Djamila, H., C.-M. Chu, and S. Kumaresan. 2012. “Assessment of gender differences in their thermal sensations to the indoor thermal environment.” In Proc., 7th CUTSE Conf. Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia: Curtin Univ.
Domingos, P. M. 2012. “A few useful things to know about machine learning.” Commun. ACM 55 (10): 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755.
Du, C., B. Li, H. Liu, Y. Ji, R. Yao, and W. Yu. 2019. “Quantification of personal thermal comfort with localized airflow system based on sensitivity analysis and classification tree model.” Energy Build. 194 (Jul): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.04.010.
Erlandson, T. M., K. Cena, and R. de Dear. 2005. “Gender differences and non-thermal factors in thermal comfort of office occupants in a hot-arid climate.” In Elsevier ergonomics: The ergonomics of human comfort, health and performance in the thermal environment, 263–268. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Farhan, A. A., K. Pattipati, B. Wang, and P. Luh. 2015. “Predicting individual thermal comfort using machine learning algorithms.” In Proc., 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 708–713. New York: IEEE.
Farhangfar, A., L. A. Kurgan, and W. Pedrycz. 2004. “Experimental analysis of methods for imputation of missing values in databases.” In Vol. 5421 of Intelligent computing: Theory and applications II, edited by K. L. Priddy, 172. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Friedman, J. H. 2001. “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.” Ann. Stat. 29 (5): 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451.
Friedman, J. H. 2002. “Stochastic gradient boosting.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38 (4): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2.
Frontczak, M., and P. Wargocki. 2011. “Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments.” Build. Environ. 46 (4): 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021.
Géron, A. 2019. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Griefahn, B., and C. Künemund. 2001. “The effects of gender, age, and fatigue on susceptibility to draft discomfort.” J. Therm. Biol. 26 (4–5): 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00050-X.
Guerra, P., and M. Castelli. 2021. “Machine learning applied to banking supervision a literature review.” Risks 9 (7): 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9070136.
Hansen, A. R., L. V. Madsen, H. N. Knudsen, and K. Gram-Hanssen. 2019. “Gender, age, and educational differences in the importance of homely comfort in Denmark.” Energy Res. Social Sci. 54 (Aug): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.004.
Haselsteiner, E. 2021. “Gender matters! Thermal comfort and individual perception of indoor environmental quality: A literature review.” In Rethinking sustainability towards a regenerative economy, 169–200. Berlin: Springer.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer.
Haynes, B., L. Suckley, and N. Nunnington. 2017. “Workplace productivity and office type: An evaluation of office occupier differences based on age and gender.” J. Corporate Real Estate 19 (2): 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-11-2016-0037.
Hong, T., Z. Wang, X. Luo, and W. Zhang. 2020. “State-of-the-art on research and applications of machine learning in the building life cycle.” Energy Build. 212 (Apr): 109831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109831.
Indraganti, M., and K. D. Rao. 2010. “Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: A field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations.” Energy Build. 42 (3): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.003.
Jowkar, M., H. B. Rijal, A. Montazami, J. Brusey, and A. Temeljotov-Salaj. 2020. “The influence of acclimatization, age and gender-related differences on thermal perception in university buildings: Case studies in Scotland and England.” Build. Environ. 179 (Jul): 106933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106933.
Kalmár, F. 2017. “An indoor environment evaluation by gender and age using an advanced personalized ventilation system.” Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 38 (5): 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624417701985.
Kim, J., R. de Dear, C. Cândido, H. Zhang, and E. Arens. 2013. “Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ).” Build. Environ. 70 (Dec): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.022.
Knez, I., and C. Kers. 2000. “Effects of indoor lighting, gender, and age on mood and cognitive performance.” Environ. Behav. 32 (6): 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916500326005.
Kotsiantis, S. B. 2007. “Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques.” In Informatica (Ljubljana) 31: 249–268.
Latha, C. B. C., and S. C. Jeeva. 2019. “Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques.” Inf. Med. Unlocked 16 (Jan): 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100203.
Le, H. H., and J.-L. Viviani. 2018. “Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios.” Res. Int. Bus. Finance 44 (Apr): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.104.
Liaw, A., and M. Wiener. 2002. “Classification and regression by randomForest.” R News 2 (3): 18–22.
Luo, M., J. Xie, Y. Yan, Z. Ke, P. Yu, Z. Wang, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Comparing machine learning algorithms in predicting thermal sensation using ASHRAE Comfort Database II.” Energy Build. 210 (Mar): 109776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109776.
Marzban, S., C. Candido, and O. Gocer. 2021. “Satisfaction with open plan offices: Personality, age and gender as human factors.” In Proc., 20th EuroFM Research Symp., 40–50. Hague, Netherlands: European Facility Management Network.
Maykot, J. K., R. F. Rupp, and E. Ghisi. 2018. “A field study about gender and thermal comfort temperatures in office buildings.” Energy Build. 178 (Nov): 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.033.
Mujan, I., A. S. Anđelković, V. Munćan, M. Kljajić, and D. Ružić. 2019. “Influence of indoor environmental quality on human health and productivity: A review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 217 (Apr): 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.307.
Nakano, J., S.-I. Tanabe, and K.-I. Kimura. 2002. “Differences in perception of indoor environment between Japanese and non-Japanese workers.” Energy Build. 34 (6): 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00012-9.
Osisanwo, F. Y., J. E. Akinsola, O. Awodele, J. Hinmikaiye, O. Olakanmi, and J. Akinjobi. 2017. “Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison.” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol. 48 (3): 128–138. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V48P126.
Papadopoulos, S., E. Azar, W.-L. Woon, and C. E. Kontokosta. 2018. “Evaluation of tree-based ensemble learning algorithms for building energy performance estimation.” J. Build. Perform. Simul. 11 (3): 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2017.1354919.
Parsons, K. C. 2002. “The effects of gender, acclimation state, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort.” Energy Build. 34 (6): 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00009-9.
Pedregosa, F., et al. 2011. “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (Nov): 2825–2830.
Pekkonen, M., L. Du, J.-P. Skön, M. Raatikainen, and U. Haverinen-Shaughnessy. 2015. “The influence of tenure status on housing satisfaction and indoor environmental quality in Finnish apartment buildings.” Build. Environ. 89 (Jul): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.003.
Pellerin, N., and V. Candas. 2003. “Combined effects of temperature and noise on human discomfort.” Physiol. Behav. 78 (1): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00956-3.
Pigliautile, I., S. Casaccia, N. Morresi, M. Arnesano, A. L. Pisello, and G. M. Revel. 2020. “Assessing occupants’ personal attributes in relation to human perception of environmental comfort: Measurement procedure and data analysis.” Build. Environ. 177 (Jun): 106901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106901.
Probst, P., M. N. Wright, and A.-L. Boulesteix. 2019. “Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 9 (3): e1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1301.
Rupp, R. F., J. Kim, R. de Dear, and E. Ghisi. 2018. “Associations of occupant demographics, thermal history and obesity variables with their thermal comfort in air-conditioned and mixed-mode ventilation office buildings.” Build. Environ. 135 (May): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.049.
Samani, S. A., and S. A. Samani. 2012. “The impact of indoor lighting on students’ learning performance in learning environments: A knowledge internalization perspective.” Int. J. Bus. Social Sci. 3 (24): 127–136.
Säter, M. 2011. User responses to lighting design with respect to gender, personality and visual preferences. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers Univ. of Technology.
Schellen, L., M. G. L. C. Loomans, M. H. de Wit, B. W. Olesen, and W. D. Lichtenbelt. 2012. “The influence of local effects on thermal sensation under non-uniform environmental conditions—Gender differences in thermophysiology, thermal comfort and productivity during convective and radiant cooling.” Physiol. Behav. 107 (2): 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.008.
Schellen, L., W. D. Van Marken Lichtenbelt, M. G. L. C. Loomans, J. Toftum, and M. H. De Wit. 2010. “Differences between young adults and elderly in thermal comfort, productivity, and thermal physiology in response to a moderate temperature drift and a steady-state condition.” Indoor Air 20 (4): 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00657.x.
Schweiker, M., et al. 2019. “The Scales Project, a cross-national dataset on the interpretation of thermal perception scales.” Sci. Data 6 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0272-6.
Siegal, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Singh, A., N. Thakur, and A. Sharma. 2016. A review of supervised machine learning algorithms.” In Proc., 10th INDIACom. New Delhi, India: IEEE.
Stitson, M. O., J. A. E. Weston, A. Gammerman, V. Vovk, and V. Vapnik. 1996. “Theory of support vector machines.” Univ. London 117 (827): 188–191.
Tamura, R., and K. Hukushima. 2018. “Bayesian optimization for computationally extensive probability distributions.” PLoS One 13 (3): e0193785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193785.
Thapa, S. 2019. “Insights into the thermal comfort of different naturally ventilated buildings of Darjeeling, India—Effect of gender, age and BMI.” Energy Build. 193 (Jun): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.04.003.
Touzani, S., J. Granderson, and S. Fernandes. 2018. “Gradient boosting machine for modeling the energy consumption of commercial buildings.” Energy Build. 158 (Jan): 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.039.
Vellei, M., M. Herrera, D. Fosas, and S. Natarajan. 2017. “The influence of relative humidity on adaptive thermal comfort.” Build. Environ. 124 (Nov): 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.005.
von Grabe, J. 2016. “Potential of artificial neural networks to predict thermal sensation votes.” Appl. Energy 161 (Jan): 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.061.
Wang, Z., R. de Dear, M. Luo, B. Lin, Y. He, A. Ghahramani, and Y. Zhu. 2018. “Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review.” Build. Environ. 138 (Jun): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040.
Wu, Z., N. Li, J. Peng, H. Cui, P. Liu, H. Li, and X. Li. 2018. “Using an ensemble machine learning methodology—Bagging to predict occupants’ thermal comfort in buildings.” Energy Build. 173 (Aug): 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.031.
Yamtraipat, N., J. Khedari, and J. Hirunlabh. 2005. “Thermal comfort standards for air conditioned buildings in hot and humid Thailand considering additional factors of acclimatization and education level.” Sol. Energy 78 (4): 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.07.006.
Zalejska-Jonsson, A. 2014. “Parameters contributing to occupants’ satisfaction: Green and conventional residential buildings.” Facilities 32 (7–8): 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2013-0021.
Zhang, J., Z. Li, Z. Pu, and C. Xu. 2018. “Comparing prediction performance for crash injury severity among various machine learning and statistical methods.” IEEE Access 6 (Oct): 60079–60087. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874979.
Zhang, Y., J. Wang, H. Chen, J. Zhang, and Q. Meng. 2010. “Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings in hot-humid area of China.” Build. Environ. 45 (11): 2562–2570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.024.
Zimmerman, A., and M. Martin. 2001. “Post-occupancy evaluation: Benefits and barriers.” Build. Res. Inf. 29 (2): 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010016857.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 36Issue 4July 2022

History

Received: Nov 10, 2021
Accepted: Feb 14, 2022
Published online: May 2, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 2, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-779X. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-2551. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4853. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Machine learning as a surrogate to building performance simulation: Predicting energy consumption under different operational settings, Energy and Buildings, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112940, 286, (112940), (2023).
  • A Systematic Assessment of Genetic Algorithm (GA) in Optimizing Machine Learning Model: A Case Study from Building Science, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 10.1109/IEEM55944.2022.9989719, (0384-0389), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share