Technical Papers
Mar 31, 2022

Productivity Measurement and Improvement for Public Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 6

Abstract

Large-scale public construction projects often become expensive white elephants requiring considerable postconstruction maintenance. Thus there is a pressing need to integrate construction and postconstruction stages into productivity measurement and analysis. However, previous studies of productivity measurement focused on the efficiency of the project delivery phase, but overlooked the utilization of the constructed facility. This paper developed a two-stage construction project productivity (CPP) measurement model by integrating site efficiency (SE) and utilization effectiveness to investigate strategies for improving the overall CPP. An as-usual setting, which delineates the measurement of CPP, was developed as the benchmark model. Given the relative nature of the productivity concept, two scenarios were considered for CPP improvement. The enhancement scenario was introduced by adding a requirement that CPP is enhanced compared with that in the benchmark model. Then a transcendence scenario was developed to ensure that CPP is better than SE. Strategies for CPP improvement were formulated and were analyzed using the analytical models developed. This study for the first time distinguished the substitutionarity and complementarity between facility occupation and facility management in the postconstruction stage, and claims that the opposite natures offer opposite strategies for CPP improvement. The empirical analysis revealed the law of diminishing marginal utility of facility management. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by extending the productivity measurement model from the construction stage only to the integration of the construction and postconstruction stages, and by offering two productivity improvement scenarios for strategy formulation. Methodologically, this paper offers a two-stage productivity measurement model and its improvement models in a mathematical way. Managerially, based on the developed models, this work offers the evidence and quantitative guidance for the policy makers and public clients to strategically improve CPP of public projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about ASCE’s Data Availability policy is available at https://ascelibrary.org/page/dataavailability.

References

Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas, and R. M. Solow. 1961. “Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 43 (3): 225–250. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927286.
Atkinson, R. 1999. “Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (6): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6.
Best, R., and J. Meikle. 2015. Measuring construction: Prices, output and productivity, edited by J. Meikle. London: Routledge.
Biedenbach, T., and M. Jacobsson. 2016. “The open secret of values: The roles of values and axiology in project research.” Project Manage. J. 47 (3): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700312.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, C. W., and P. H. Douglas. 1928. “A theory of production.” Am. Econ. Rev. 18 (1): 139–165.
Coelli, T. J., D. S. P. Rao, C. J. O’Donnell, and G. E. Battes. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.
Cooke-Davies, T. 2002. “The ‘real’ success factors on projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (3): 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9.
Cross, K. F., and R. L. Lynch. 1988. “The SMART way to sustain and define success.” Nat. Product. Rev. 8 (1): 23–33.
De Valence, G. 2005. “Production theory and construction productivity.” In Proc., 13th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 135–141. New York: International Group on Lean Construction.
Fellows, R., and A. Liu. 2015. Research methods for construction. New York: Wiley.
Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fraser, K., J. Gunawan, and M. Goh. 2013. “Facility management teams: Identifying important human factors from a manufacturing environment.” J. Facil. Manage. 11 (3): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2012-0023.
Grix, J. 2001. Demystifying postgraduate research. London: A&C Black.
Henningsen, A., and G. Henningsen. 2011. Econometric estimation of the ‘constant elasticity of substitution’ function in R: Package micEconCES. Copenhagen, Denmark: Univ. of Copenhagen.
İmrohoroğlu, A., and Ş. Tüzel. 2014. “Firm-level productivity, risk, and return.” Manage. Sci. 60 (8): 2073–2090. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1852.
Kasimati, E. 2015. “Post-Olympic use of the Olympic venues: The case of Greece.” Athens J. Sports 2 (3): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.2-3-3.
Kmenta, J. 1967. “On estimation of the CES production function.” Int. Econ. Rev. 8 (2): 180–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525600.
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, FD: Valtion teknillinen tutkimuske Publications.
Koskela, L., and G. Ballard. 2006. “Should project management be based on theories of economics or production?” Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500491480.
Lavy, S., J. A. Garcia, and M. K. Dixit. 2010. “Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: Review of literature.” Facilities 28 (9): 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011057189.
Lim, C. S., and M. Z. Mohamed. 1999. “Criteria of project success: An exploratory re-examination.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (4): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00040-4.
Mulej, M., M. Bastic, J. Belak, J. Knez-Riedl, M. Pivka, V. Potocan, M. Rebernik, D. Urⓢiⓒ, Z. Zenko, and N. Mulej. 2003. “Informal systems thinking or systems theory.” Cybern. Syst. 34 (2): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969720302868.
Nachum, L. 1999. “Measurement of productivity of professional services: An illustration on Swedish management consulting firms.” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 19 (9): 922–950. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910280269.
Neely, A., J. Mills, K. Platts, H. Richards, M. Gregory, M. Bourne, and M. Kennerley. 2000. “Performance measurement system design: Developing and testing a process-based approach.” Int. J. Operation Prod. Manage. 20 (10): 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708.
Pan, W. 2018. “Rethinking construction productivity theory and practice.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 8 (3): 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2018-125.
Pan, W., L. Chen, and W. Zhan. 2019. “PESTEL analysis of construction productivity enhancement strategies: A case study of three economies.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 05018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000662.
Pan, W., and Y. Ning. 2014. “A socio-technical framework of zero-carbon building policies.” Build. Res. Inf. 43 (1): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.955759.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2016. Construction extension to the PMBOK guide. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Pollak, R. A., and T. J. Wales. 1987. “Specification and estimation of nonseparable two-stage technologies: The Leontief CES and the Cobb-Douglas CES.” J. Political Econ. 95 (2): 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/261457.
Prasser, S. 2007. “Overcoming the ‘white elephant’ syndrome in big and iconic projects in the public and private sectors.” In Improving implementation: Organisational change and project management, 47–67. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/II.02.2007.05.
Sapri, M., and M. Pitt. 2005. “Performance measurement in facilities management; state of knowledge.” In Vol. 1 of 21st Annual ARCOM Conf., edited by F. Khosrowshahi, 431–440. London: Univ. of London.
Scott, P. 1992. A herd of white elephants: Some big technology projects in Australia. Sydney, Australia: Hale and Iremonger.
Segrestin, B., and A. Hatchuel. 2011. “Beyond agency theory, a post-crisis view of corporate law.” Br. J. Manage. 22 (3): 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00763.x.
Shrnhur, A. J., O. Levy, and D. Dvir. 1997. “Mapping the dimensions of project success.” Project Manage. J. 28 (2): 5–13.
Sterman, J. D. 2004. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Syverson, C. 2011. “What determines productivity?” J. Econ. Lit. 49 (2): 326–365.
Tangen, S. 2005. “Demystifying productivity and performance.” Int. J. Productivity Perform. Manage. 54 (1): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510571437.
Wegelius-Lehtonen, T. 2001. “Performance measurement in construction logistics” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 69 (1): 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00034-7.
Zhan, W., and W. Pan. 2020. “Formulating systemic construction productivity enhancement strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (8): 05020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001886.
Zhan, W., W. Pan, and L. Chen. 2021. “Construction project productivity evaluation framework with expanded system boundaries.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (4): 863–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2019-0691.
Zwikael, O., and J. Smyrk. 2012. “A general framework for gauging the performance of initiatives to enhance organizational value.” Supplement, Br. J. Manage. 23 (S1): S6–S22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00823.x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Jun 21, 2021
Accepted: Feb 3, 2022
Published online: Mar 31, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 31, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Public Administration, School of Management, Zhejiang Shuren Univ., Shuren Rd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-128X. Email: [email protected]
Wei Pan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. Email: [email protected]
Gang Hao, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Management Sciences, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Exploring Environmental Collaboration and Greenwashing in Construction Projects: Integrative Governance Framework, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13543, 149, 11, (2023).
  • Using Fuzzy Inference Systems for Lean Management Strategies in Construction Project Delivery, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12922, 149, 9, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share