Technical Papers
Feb 11, 2021

Predicting the Occurrence of Construction Disputes Using Machine Learning Techniques

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

The construction industry is overwhelmed by an increasing number and severity of disputes. The primary objective of this research is to predict the occurrence of disputes by utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques on empirical data. For this reason, variables affecting dispute occurrence were identified from the literature, and a conceptual model was developed to depict the common factors. Based on the conceptual model, a questionnaire was designed to collect empirical data from experts. Chi-square tests were conducted to reveal the associations between input variables and dispute occurrence. Alternative classification techniques were tested, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers achieved the best average accuracy (90.46%). Ensemble classifiers combining the tested classification techniques were developed for enhanced prediction performance. Experimental results showed that the best ensemble classifier, obtained from the majority voting technique, can achieve 91.11% average accuracy. Based on Chi-square tests, the most influential factors on dispute occurrence were found as variations and unexpected events in projects. Other important predictors were all related to the skills of the parties involved. This study contributes to the construction dispute domain in three ways: (1) by proposing a conceptual model that combined the diverse efforts in the literature for identifying variables affecting dispute occurrence; (2) by highlighting the influential factors, such as response rate and communication skills, as indicators for potential disputes; and (3) by providing an empirical ML-based model with enhanced prediction capabilities that can function as an early-warning mechanism for decision-makers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. Company names, project names, and participant contact information cannot be provided to preserve the anonymity of participants and to comply with legal issues, such as privacy laws; instead, generic identification numbers have been assigned to each case.

References

AAA (American Arbitration Association). 2018. “2017 annual report.” Accessed April 25, 2020. http://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/document_repository/AAA_AnnualReport_Financials_2018.pdf.
Agresti, A. 2007. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Akoglu, H. 2018. “User’s guide to correlation coefficients.” Turk. J. Emergency Med. 18 (3): 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
Al-Khoder, A., and H. Harmouch. 2015. “Evaluating four of the most popular open sources and free data mining tools.” Int. J. Acad. Sci. Res. 3 (1): 13–23.
Alpaydin, E. 2010. Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
An, S., U. Park, K. Kang, M.-Y. Cho, and H. Cho. 2007. “Application of support vector machines in assessing conceptual cost estimates.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 21 (4): 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:4(259).
Arasu, B. S., B. J. B. Seelan, and N. Thamaraiselvan. 2020. “A machine learning-based approach to enhancing social media marketing.” Comput. Electr. Eng. 86 (2020): 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106723.
Arditi, D., and T. Pulket. 2010. “Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using an integrated artificial intelligence model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(73).
Awwad, R., B. Barakat, and C. Menassa. 2016. “Understanding dispute resolution in the Middle East region from perspectives of different stakeholder.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 05016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000465.
Ayhan, M. 2019. “Development of dispute prediction and resolution method selection models for construction disputes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ.
Bilal, M., L. O. Oyedele, J. Qadir, K. Munir, S. O. Ajayi, O. O. Akinade, H. A. Owolabi, H. A. Alaka, and M. Pasha. 2016. “Big data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 30 (2016): 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001.
Chen, J. H., and S. C. Hsu. 2007. “Hybrid ANN-CBR model for disputed change orders in construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 17 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.003.
Cheng, M. Y., H. C. Tsai, and Y. H. Chiu. 2009. “Fuzzy case-based reasoning for coping with construction disputes.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2): 4106–4113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.025.
Cheng, M. Y., and Y. W. Wu. 2009. “Evolutionary support vector machine inference system for construction management.” Autom. Constr. 18 (5): 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.12.002.
Cheung, S. O., R. F. Au-Yeung, and V. W. K. Wong. 2004. “A CBR based dispute resolution process selection system.” Int. J. IT Archit. Eng. Constr. 2 (2): 129–145.
Cheung, S. O., and K. H. Y. Pang. 2013. “Anatomy of construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532.
Cheung, S. O., and H. C. H. Suen. 2002. “A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 20 (7): 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210157568.
Chou, J. S. 2012. “Comparison of multilabel classification models to forecast project dispute resolutions.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (11): 10202–10211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.103.
Chou, J. S., M. Y. Cheng, and Y. W. Wu. 2013a. “Improving classification accuracy of project dispute resolution using hybrid artificial intelligence and support vector machine models.” Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (6): 2263–2274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.036.
Chou, J. S., M. Y. Cheng, Y. W. Wu, and A. D. Pham. 2014. “Optimizing parameters of support vector machine using fast messy genetic algorithm for dispute classification.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (8): 3955–3964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.035.
Chou, J. S., S. C. Hsu, C. W. Lin, and Y. C. Chang. 2016. “Classifying influential information to discover rule sets for project disputes and possible resolutions.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (8): 1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.001.
Chou, J. S., and C. Lin. 2013. “Predicting disputes in public-private partnership projects: Classification and ensemble models.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000197.
Chou, J. S., C. Tsai, and Y. Lu. 2013b. “Project dispute prediction by hybrid machine learning techniques.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 19 (4): 505–517. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.768544.
Dalton, D., and N. Shehadeh. 1992. “Statistical modelling of claims procedures and construction conflicts.” In Construction conflict management and resolution, edited by P. Fenn and R. Gameson, 275–285. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203474396-27.
Diekmann, J. E., and M. J. Girard. 1995. “Are contract disputes predictable?” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 121 (4): 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:4(355).
ENR (Engineering News-Record). 2018. “ENR’s top 250 international contractors.” Accessed April 25, 2020. https://www.enr.com/toplists/2018-Top-250-International-Contractors-1.
Febriantono, M. A., S. H. Pramono, R. Rahmadwati, and G. Naghdy. 2020. “Classification of multiclass imbalanced data using cost-sensitive decision tree C5.0.” IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 9 (1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v9.i1.pp65-72.
Fenn, P. 2007. “Predicting construction disputes: An aetiological approach.” In Vol. 160 of Proc., ICE—Management, Procurement and Law, 69–73. London: ICE Publishing.
Frank, E., H. A. Mark, and I. H. Witten. 2016. “The WEKA workbench.” In Online appendix for ‘Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques’. 4th ed. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
HKIAC (Hong Kong International Arbitration Center). 2018. “HKIAC annual report 2018 reflections.” Accessed April 25, 2020. https://www.hkiac.org/sites/default/files/annual_report/annual%20report%203463-7390-6190%20v.4.pdf.
Hssina, B., A. Merbouha, H. Ezzikouri, and M. Erritali. 2014. “A comparative study of decision tree ID3 and C4.5.” Int. J. Adv. Comp. Sci. Appl., Special Issue on Advances in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking and Applications: 13–19. https://doi.org/10.14569/SpecialIssue.2014.040203.
Ilter, D. 2012. “Identification of the relations between dispute factors and dispute categories in construction projects.” Int. J. Law Built Environ. 4 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451211211732.
Ilter, D., and A. Dikbas. 2009. “An investigation of the factors influencing dispute frequency in construction projects.” In Proc., RICS Int. Res. Conf. (COBRA 2009), 1496–1504. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Kilian, J. J., and G. E. Gibson. 2005. “Construction litigation for the U.S. naval facilities engineering command, 1982–2002.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (9): 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:9(945).
Liao, S. H., P. H. Chu, and P. Y. Hsiao. 2012. “Data mining techniques and applications–A decade review from 2000 to 2011.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (12): 11303–11311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.063.
Love, P. E. D., P. R. Davis, J. Ellis, and S. O. Cheung. 2010. “Dispute causation: Identification of pathogenic influences in construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 17 (4): 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011056592.
Mahfouz, T., A. Kandil, and S. Davlyatov. 2018. “Identification of latent knowledge in differing site condition (DSC) litigations.” Autom. Constr. 94 (Oct): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.011.
McHugh, M. L. 2012. “Interrater reliability: The Kappa statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–282.
McHugh, M. L. 2013. “The Chi-square test of independence.” Biochemia Medica 23 (2): 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018.
Mokhtar, S. H. M., and S. A. Rahman. 2017. “The roles of big data and knowledge management in business decision making process.” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 7 (12): 422–428. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3623.
Molenaar, K., S. Washington, and J. Diekmann. 2000. “Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (4): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268).
Parikh, D., G. J. Joshi, and D. A. Patel. 2019. “Development of prediction models for claim cause analyses in highway projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11(4): 04519018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000303.
Pollock, P. H., III. 2011. An SPSS companion to political analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Pulket, T., and D. Arditi. 2009. “Construction litigation prediction system using ant colony optimization.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 (3): 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802714781.
Soni, S., M. Pandey, and S. Agrawal. 2017. “Conflicts and disputes in construction projects: An overview.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 7 (6): 40–42. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0706074042.
Sonmez, R., and B. Sozgen. 2017. “A support vector machine method for bid/no bid decision making.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (5): 641–649. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1281836.
Tazelaar, F., and C. Snijders. 2010. “Dispute resolution and litigation in the construction industry. Evidence on conflicts and conflict resolution in The Netherlands and Germany.” J. Purch. Supply Manage. 16 (4): 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.08.003.
Ustuner, Y. A., and E. Tas. 2019. “An examination of the mediation processes of international ADR institutions and evaluation of the Turkish construction professionals’ perspectives on mediation.” Eurasian J. Soc. Sci. 7 (4): 11–27.
Vanwinckelen, G., and H. Blockeel. 2012. “On estimating model accuracy with repeated cross-validation.” In Proc., 21st Belgian-Dutch Conf. on Machine Learning, 39–44. Ghent, Belgium: Benelearn 2012 Organization Committee. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1655861?limo=0.
Weisburd, D., and C. Britt. 2007. “Chapter 13: Measures of association for nominal and ordinal variables.” In Statistics in criminal justice, 335–380. Boston: Springer.
Witten, H. W., E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. J. Pal. 2016. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Yousefi, V., S. H. Yakhchali, M. Khanzadi, E. Mehrabanfar, and J. Šaparauskas. 2016. “Proposing a neural network model to predict time and cost claims in construction projects.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 22 (7): 967–978. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1205510.
Yu, W. D. 2007. “Hybrid soft computing approach for mining of complex construction databases.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 21 (5): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:5(343).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: May 4, 2020
Accepted: Nov 9, 2020
Published online: Feb 11, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Gazi Univ., Maltepe, Ankara 06570, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-4190. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-7557
M. Talat Birgonul, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-2926
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-2926

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share