Technical Papers
Jan 18, 2021

Measurement of Fuzzy Membership Functions in Construction Risk Assessment

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Fuzzy set theory (FST), especially its concepts of linguistic variables and fuzzy membership functions (FMFs), has been frequently used in construction risk assessment due to a lack of historical data and reliance on expert opinions. However, FMFs have to be properly defined to leverage the ability of FST in dealing with vagueness, imprecision, and uncertainty in expert opinions. This study aims to identify risk variables and their associated FMFs used in relevant literature and develop a process of measuring FMFs. The research methodology involves conducting a systematic review, developing a process for defining FMFs, and validating the proposed process through an illustrative case study with hurricane storms as a risk event. Results showed that only 11 risk factors represented 77% variables used in 131 articles that were found relevant for further analysis. Most studies (88%) arbitrarily assigned FMFs to their risk variables despite the fact that defining FMFs is one of the critical steps for the successful use of FST-based methods. Membership functions have to be measured with relevant data, including those provided by experts. To fill this knowledge gap, a step-by-step process is developed based on the modified horizontal approach and applied in the case study to appropriately determine the FMFs of the risk variables. Separate empirical hurricane-related public data were used to verify the determined FMFs. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing standardizing FST-based methods for risk assessment and measuring the FMFs of risk variables. The study also facilitates the application of FST-based methods in actual construction projects and operations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abad, F., E. Eshtehardian, and K. Taghizade. 2019. “Framework for proactive change management: Assessing the risk of change in construction projects using fuzzy fault tree analysis.” J. Archit. Eng. 25 (2): 04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000358.
Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210.
Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2012. “Comprehensive hybrid framework for risk analysis in the construction industry using combined failure mode and effect analysis, fault trees, event trees, and fuzzy logic.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (5): 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000471.
Adjenughwure, K., and B. Papadopoulos. 2016. “A new hybrid fuzzy-statistical membership function based on fuzzy estimators.” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30 (5): 2761–2771. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-152029.
Aksnes, D. W., and G. Sivertsen. 2019. “A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science.” J. Data Inf. Sci. 4 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001.
Baloi, D., and A. D. Price. 2003. “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (4): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0.
Beltrão, L. M., and M. T. Carvalho. 2019. “Prioritizing construction risks using fuzzy AHP in Brazilian public enterprises.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 05018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001606.
Bilgiç, T., and I. B. Türkşen. 2000. “Measurement of membership functions: Theoretical and empirical work.” In Fundamentals of fuzzy sets, 195–227. Boston: Springer.
Cárdenas, I. C., S. S. Al-Jibouri, J. I. Halman, and F. A. van Tol. 2013. “Capturing and integrating knowledge for managing risks in tunnel works.” Risk Anal.: Int. J. 33 (1): 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01829.x.
Chan, A. P., D. W. Chan, and J. F. Yeung. 2009. “Overview of the application of ‘fuzzy techniques’ in construction management research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (11): 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000099.
Cheng, M., and Y. Lu. 2015. “Developing a risk assessment method for complex pipe jacking construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 58 (Oct): 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.011.
Cheng, M. Y., and N. D. Hoang. 2014. “Risk score inference for bridge maintenance project using evolutionary fuzzy least squares support vector machine.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (3): 04014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000275.
Choi, H. H., and S. Mahadevan. 2008. “Construction project risk assessment using existing database and project-specific information.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (11): 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:11(894).
Cooper, D. F., S. Grey, G. Raymond, and P. Walker. 2005. Project risk management guidelines: Managing risk in large projects and complex procurements. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Devi, B. B., and V. V. S. Sarma. 1985. “Estimation of fuzzy memberships from histograms.” Inf. Sci. 35 (1): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(85)90040-4.
Devi, K. 2011. “Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (11): 14163–14168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227.
Dikmen, I., M. T. Birgonul, and S. Han. 2007. “Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5): 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.12.002.
Dubois, D. 2011. “The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 184 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.06.003.
Ebrahimnejad, S., S. M. Mousavi, and H. Seyrafianpour. 2010. “Risk identification and assessment for build–operate–transfer projects: A fuzzy multi attribute decision making model.” Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (1): 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.037.
Ebrahimnejad, S., S. M. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, H. Hashemi, and B. Vahdani. 2012. “A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment.” Appl. Math. Modell. 36 (9): 4197–4217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050.
Elbarkouky, M. M., A. R. Fayek, N. B. Siraj, and N. Sadeghi. 2016. “Fuzzy arithmetic risk analysis approach to determine construction project contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001191.
Elbarkouky, M. M., N. B. Siraj, and A. R. Fayek. 2015. “Fuzzy Contingency Determinator© a fuzzy arithmetic-based risk analysis tool for construction projects.” In Proc., 2015 Annual Conf. of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS) held jointly with 2015 5th World Conf. on Soft Computing (WConSC), 1–6. New York: IEEE.
Enshassi, M. S., S. Walbridge, J. S. West, and C. T. Haas. 2020. “Dynamic and proactive risk-based methodology for managing excessive geometric variability issues in modular construction projects using Bayesian theory.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (2): 04019096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001747.
Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. 2008. “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses.” FASEB J. 22 (2): 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
Fares, H., and T. Zayed. 2010. “Hierarchical fuzzy expert system for risk of failure of water mains.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 1 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000037.
Fayek, A. R. 2020. “Fuzzy logic and fuzzy hybrid techniques for construction engineering and management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 04020064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001854.
Fayek, A. R., and A. Oduba. 2005. “Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (8): 938–941. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(938).
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five misunderstandings about case-study research.” Qual. Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
Fouladgar, M. M., A. Yazdani-Chamzini, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2012. “Risk evaluation of tunneling projects.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 12 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.008.
Gondia, A., A. Siam, W. El-Dakhakhni, and A. H. Nassar. 2020. “Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 04019085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001736.
Govan, P., and I. Damnjanovic. 2020. “Structural network measures for risk assessment of construction projects.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 04019024. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001041.
Grant, M. J., and A. Booth. 2009. “A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.” Health Inf. Libraries J. 26 (2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Gusenbauer, M., and N. R. Haddaway. 2020. “Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.” Res. Synth. Methods 11 (2): 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378.
Husin, S., F. Fachrurrazi, M. Rizalihadi, and M. Mubarak. 2019. “Implementing fuzzy TOPSIS on project risk variable ranking.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9283409.
Idrus, A., M. F. Nuruddin, and M. A. Rohman. 2011. “Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (3): 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.061.
Ishizaka, A., and N. H. Nguyen. 2013. “Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection.” Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (9): 3775–3783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.089.
Islam, M. S., M. P. Nepal, and M. Skitmore. 2019. “Modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to cost overrun risk assessment of power plant projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001593.
Islam, M. S., M. P. Nepal, M. Skitmore, and M. Attarzadeh. 2017. “Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 33 (Aug): 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001.
Jamshidi, A., A. Yazdani-Chamzini, S. H. Yakhchali, and S. Khaleghi. 2013. “Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 (1): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.10.010.
Jang, J. S. R., C. T. Sun, and E. Mizutani. 1997. Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jin, X. H. 2010. “Neurofuzzy decision support system for efficient risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (6): 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000058.
Jung, J. H., D. Y. Kim, and H. K. Lee. 2016. “The computer-based contingency estimation through analysis cost overrun risk of public construction project.” J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0184-8.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2016. “A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (8): 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093.
Kangari, R. 1988. “Construction risk management.” Civ. Eng. Syst. 5 (3): 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02630258808970516.
KarimiAzari, A., N. Mousavi, S. F. Mousavi, and S. Hosseini. 2011. “Risk assessment model selection in construction industry.” Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (8): 9105–9111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110.
Klir, G., and B. Yuan. 1995. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lucero, Y. C., and P. A. Nava. 1999. “A method for membership function generation from training samples.” In Vol. 21 of Proc., of the 1999 Int. Congress on Electronics and Electrical Engineering (ELECTRO 99), 7–10. New York: IEEE.
Lucko, G., and E. M. Rojas. 2010. “Research validation: Challenges and opportunities in the construction domain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000025.
Medasani, S., J. Kim, and R. Krishnapuram. 1998. “An overview of membership function generation techniques for pattern recognition.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 19 (3–4): 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(98)10017-8.
Mokhtari, K., J. Ren, C. Roberts, and J. Wang. 2012. “Decision support framework for risk management on sea ports and terminals using fuzzy set theory and evidential reasoning approach.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (5): 5087–5103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.030.
Möller, B., and M. Beer. 2008. “Engineering computation under uncertainty—Capabilities of non-traditional models.” Comput. Struct. 86 (10): 1024–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.041.
Naderpajouh, N., and M. Hastak. 2014. “Quantitative analysis of policies for governance of emergent dynamics in complex construction projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 32 (12): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.980835.
Nasirzadeh, F., A. Afshar, M. Khanzadi, and S. Howick. 2008. “Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modelling for construction risk management.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 26 (11): 1197–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802459924.
Ng, S. T., D. T. Luu, S. E. Chen, and K. C. Lam. 2002. “Fuzzy membership functions of procurement selection criteria.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (3): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210121288.
Pedrycz, W. 1993. Fuzzy control and fuzzy systems. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
PSC (Florida Public Service Commission). 2018. “Review of Florida’s electric utility hurricane preparedness and restoration actions 2018.” Accessed February 24, 2020. http://www.floridapsc.com/Files/PDF/Publications/Reports/Electricgas/UtilityHurricanePreparednessRestorationActions2018.pdf.
Reagan, R. T., F. Mosteller, and C. Youtz. 1989. “Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions.” J. Appl. Psychol. 74 (3): 433. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.433.
Salah, A., and O. Moselhi. 2016. “Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 43 (5): 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0154.
Teegavarapu, S., and J. D. Summers. 2008. “Case study method for design research.” In Proc., of ASME 2008 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. & Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. New York: ASME.
Umer, W., H. Li, W. Lu, G. P. Y. Szeto, and A. Y. Wong. 2018. “Development of a tool to monitor static balance of construction workers for proactive fall safety management.” Autom. Constr. 94 (Oct): 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.024.
Verkuilen, J. 2005. “Assigning membership in a fuzzy set analysis.” Sociological Methods Res. 33 (4): 462–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124105274498.
Xia, B., A. P. Chan, and J. F. Yeung. 2011. “Developing a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model for selecting design-build operational variations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000381.
Xia, N., P. X. Zou, M. A. Griffin, X. Wang, and R. Zhong. 2018. “Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (5): 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.006.
Xu, Y., A. P. Chan, and J. F. Yeung. 2010. “Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000189.
Yazdani-Chamzini, A. 2014. “Proposing a new methodology based on fuzzy logic for tunnelling risk assessment.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (1): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843583.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zadeh, L. A. 2008. “Is there a need for fuzzy logic?” Inf. Sci. 178 (13): 2751–2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Mar 15, 2020
Accepted: Oct 23, 2020
Published online: Jan 18, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Florida Gulf Coast Univ., Fort Myers, FL 33965; Adjunct Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open Univ., Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1879-8327. Email: [email protected]
Dai Q. Tran, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share