Technical Papers
Nov 23, 2020

Bid or No-Bid Decision Model for International Construction Projects: Evidential Reasoning Approach

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

The decision to bid or not bid on international construction project tenders is highly complex, due to the many uncertain factors associated with such projects. This study proposes a multiattribute bid or no-bid decision model based on the evidential reasoning (ER) approach, which effectively deals with the uncertainty arising from qualitative criteria and incomplete information. Evaluation of the bid or no-bid decision is divided into six stages according to the objectives set in the decision framework, as proposed in an earlier study. The ER approach plays a triple role in the model, improving the method for ascertaining the weights of criteria, aggregating the qualitative and incomplete information assessments of experts, and fusing the value of lower attributes to an upper attribute. The decision model is validated as feasible through the successful application of the model in a case project and verified as practical by an experimental case study. Although this decision model has certain limitations, it offers an innovative way of solving the bid or no-bid decision problem within the international construction setting. This study contributes to the body of knowledge in international construction management by providing a validated bid or no-bid decision model tailored to the specific considerations required of overseas projects and enriches the knowledge and application of the ER approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71971147 and 71371131) and Chengdu University of Technology (No. JG183029).

References

Abdelrazig, A. A. 1995. “Computerized AHP model for solving bid/no-bid decision problem.” Master dissertation, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals.
Ahmad, I. 1990. “Decision-support system for modeling bid/no-bid decision problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (4): 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(595).
Al-Humaidi, H. M. 2016. “Construction projects bid or not bid approach using the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity FTOPSIS method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001180.
Bagies, A., and C. Fortune. 2006. “Bid/no-bid decision modelling for construction projects.” In Proc., 22nd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conf., 511–521. Reading, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Cheng, M.-Y., C.-C. Hsiang, H.-C. Tsai, and H.-L. Do. 2011. “Bidding decision making for construction company using a multi-criteria prospect model.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (3): 424–436. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.598337.
Chou, J.-S., A.- D. Pham, and H. Wang. 2013. “Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation.” Autom. Constr. 35 (Nov): 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.06.007.
Cowles, M. F. 1974. “A rule of thumb for psychology researchers.” Perceptual Motor Skill 38 (3): 1135–1138. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.38.3c.1135.
Dempster, A. P. 1967. “Upper and lower conditional probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping.” Ann. Math. Stat. 458 (2): 1214–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.10.006.
Egemen, M., and A. Mohamed. 2007. “A framework for contractors to reach strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions.” Build. Environ. 42 (3): 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.016.
Egemen, M., and A. Mohamed. 2008. “SCBMD: A knowledge-based system software for strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions.” Autom. Constr. 17 (7): 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.013.
El-Mashaleh, M. S. 2013. “Empirical framework for making the bid/no-bid decision.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (3): 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000147.
Fayek, A. 1998. “Competitive bidding strategy model and software system for bid preparation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(1).
Frame, J. 2002. The new project management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Graham, G., and G. Hardaker. 2001. “Contractor evaluation in the aerospace industry: Using the evidential reasoning approach.” J. Res. Marketing Entrepreneurship 3 (3): 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715200180001485.
Han, S., and J. E. Diekmann. 2001. “Approaches for making risk-based go/no-go decision for international projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (4): 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(300).
Han, S. H. 1995. “Risk-based go/no-go decision making model for international construction projects: The cross-impact analysis approach.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environment, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder.
Herrera-Viedma, E., F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, and M. Luque. 2004. “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154 (1): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7.
Hwang, J. S., and Y. S. Kim. 2016. “A bid decision-making model in the initial bidding phase for overseas construction projects.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1189–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0760-y.
Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leśniak, A., and E. Plebankiewicz. 2015. “Modeling the decision-making process concerning participation in construction bidding.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (2): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000237.
Li, G., C. Chen, G. Zhang, and I. Martek. 2019. “Bid/no-bid decision factors for Chinese international contractors in international construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (7): 1619–1643. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2018-0526.
Li, G., G. Zhang, C. Chen, and I. Martek. 2020. “Empirical bid/no bid decision process in international construction projects: A structural equation modeling framework.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 04020050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001830.
Lin, C.-T., and Y.-T. Chen. 2004. “Bid/no-bid decision-making: A fuzzy linguistic approach.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (7): 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.005.
Lowe, D. J., and J. Parvar. 2004. “A logistic regression approach to modelling the contractor’s decision to bid.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 22 (6): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190310001649056.
Messner, J. 1994. An information framework for evaluating international construction projects. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ.
Mohamed, M., and M. Emad. 2018. “Modeling bid/no bid decisions using fuzzy fault tree.” Constr. Innovation 18 (1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2016-0060.
Polat, G., B. N. Bingol, and E. Uysalol. 2014. “Modeling bid/no bid decision using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS): A case study.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2014, 1083–1092. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ravanshadnia, M., H. Rajaie, and H. R. Abbasian. 2011. “A comprehensive bid/no bid decision making framework for construction companies.” Trans. Civ. Environ. Eng. 35 (1): 95–103.
Ren, J., I. Jenkinson, J. Wang, D. L. Xu, and J. B. Yang. 2009. “An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 131 (4): 041101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3124123.
Seydel, J., and D. L. Olson. 2007. “Bids considering multiple criteria.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (4): 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(609).
Shafer, G. 1976. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sonmez, R., and B. Sözgen. 2017. “A support vector machine method for bid/no bid decision making.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (5): 641–649. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1281836.
Sönmez, M., G. D. Holt, J. B. Yang, and G. Graham. 2002. “Applying evidential reasoning to prequalifying construction contractors.” J. Manage. Eng. 18 (3): 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:3(111).
Sönmez, M., J. B. Yang, and G. D. Holt. 2001. “Addressing the contractor selection problem using an evidential reasoning approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 8 (3): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021182.
Tan, Y.-T., L.-Y. Shen, C. Langston, and Y. Liu. 2010. “Construction project selection using fuzzy TOPSIS approach.” J. Modell. Manage. 5 (3): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465661011092669.
Wang, J., Y. Xu, and Z. Li. 2009. “Research on project selection system of pre-evaluation of engineering design project bidding.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (6): 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.003.
Wanous, M., H. A. Boussabaine, and J. Lewis. 2003. “A neural network bid/no bid model: The case for contractors in Syria.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 21 (7): 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000093323.
Xu, D.-L. 2012. “An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis.” Ann. Oper. Res. 195 (1): 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0945-9.
Yang, J.-B. 2001. “Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131 (1): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5.
Yang, J.-B., and D.-L. Xu. 2002. “On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 32 (3): 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802746.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Jan 9, 2020
Accepted: Aug 31, 2020
Published online: Nov 23, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Guanghua Li [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu Univ. of Technology, No. 1, Dongsan Rd., Erxianqiao, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province 610059, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Business School, Sichuan Univ., No. 29, Jiuyanqiao Wangjiang Rd., Chengdu City, Sichuan Province 610065, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin Univ., No. 1, Gheringhap St., Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6573-1291. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu Univ. of Technology, No. 1, Dongsan Rd., Erxianqiao, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province 610059, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu Univ. of Technology, No. 1, Dongsan Rd., Erxianqiao, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province 610059, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share