Technical Papers
Dec 11, 2020

Proactive Design Quality Assessment Tool for Building Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

Building projects have become increasingly complex in recent decades for various reasons, including continuously improving technology, ongoing demand for more sophisticated design, and larger numbers of project stakeholders. Consequently, project teams find it increasingly difficult to attain design quality without errors or omissions. To provide a proactive approach to design quality management of building projects, this study focused on developing a design quality assessment tool based on the contributing causal factors and impacts of high-priority design defects. To this end, the authors first conducted interviews with 66 industry professionals to identify the contributing causal factors and impacts of quality-problematic design defects. Based on the results of these interviews, the authors generated 160 leading indicator questions to incorporate into their design quality assessment tool. The developed implementation tool enables practitioners to assess project design quality and prevent undesirable risks in a timely manner. This study deepens understanding of building design defects and supports design quality improvement through an effective design quality assessment tool.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Construction Industry Institute (CII). The authors would like to express gratitude and appreciation to the industry panels, survey participants, interviewees, and support staff at CII for their participation in the research effort.

References

Abdalaziz, S. 2009. Factors affecting the quality of design and contractual documents in Gaza Strip. Gaza Strip: Islamic Univ. of Gaza.
Abolnour, M. M. 1994. “The relationship of fee structure in engineering offices and design deficiency.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals.
Al-Far, M. I. 2005. Factors affecting design documentation quality in construction industry. Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals.
Atkinson, A. R. 2002. “The pathology of building defects: A human error approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 9 (1): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021206.
Burati, J., and J. Farrington. 1987. Cost of quality deviations in design and construction. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Burati, J. L., J. J. Farrington, and W. B. Ledbetter. 1992. “Causes of quality deviations in design and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 118 (1): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(34).
Busby, J. S. 2001. “Error and distributed cognition in design.” Des. Stud. 22 (3): 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00028-4.
Chalabi, A. F., B. J. Beaudin, and G. F. Salazar. 1987. Input variables impacting design effectiveness. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Dickmann, J., and M. Nelson. 1985. “Construction claims: Frequency and severity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 111 (1): 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1985)111:1(74).
Gann, D. M., A. J. Salter, and J. K. Whyte. 2003. “Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking.” Build. Res. Inf. 31 (5): 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000107564.
Giddings, B., M. Sharma, P. Jones, and P. Jensen. 2013. “An evaluation tool for design quality: PFI sheltered housing.” Build. Res. Inf. 41 (6): 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.775895.
Homes and Communities Agency. 2011. “Housing quality indicators.” Accessed March 1, 2020. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/housing-quality-indicators.
Kirby, J. G., D. A. Furry, and D. K. Hicks. 1988. “Improvements in design review management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 114 (1): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1988)114:1(69).
Lopez, R., P. E. Love, D. J. Edwards, and P. R. Davis. 2010. “Design error classification, causation, and prevention in construction engineering.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (4): 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000116.
Love, P., P. Mandel, and H. Li. 1997. “A systematic approach to modeling the causes and effects of rework in construction.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Construction Industry Development: Building the Future Together, 347–355. Singapore: National Univ. of Singapore.
Love, P. E. D., D. J. Edwards, Z. Irani, and D. H. T. Walker. 2009. “Project pathogens: The anatomy of omission errors in construction and engineering projects.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 56 (3): 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.927774.
McGeorge, J. F. 1988. “Design productivity: A quality problem.” J. Manage. Eng. 4 (4): 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:4(350).
Minato, T. 2003. “Design documents quality in the Japanese construction industry: Factors influencing and impacts on construction process.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (7): 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00083-2.
Mokhtar, A., C. Bedard, and P. Fazio. 1998. “Information model for managing design changes in a collaborative environment.” J. Comp. Civ. Eng. 12 (2): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:2(82).
O’Connor, J. T., and H. Koo. 2020. “Analyzing the quality problems and defects of design deliverables on building projects.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (4): 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000432.
O’Connor, J. T., and J. Woo. 2017. “Proactive approach to engineering and design deliverables quality enhancement.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (4): 04017005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000508.
Queensland. 2005. Getting it right the first time: An examination of an industry problem as it applies to Queensland and recommendations for solutions and actions. Barton, Australia: Engineers Australia.
Reason, J. T. 1990. “The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 327 (1241): 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0090.
Steffen, M. P., and M. J. Houston. 1990. Quality management in the design and construction of enclosure systems. Portland, OR: Walsh Construction.
Tilley, P. A. 1998. Causes, effects and indicators of design and documentation deficiency. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Univ. of Technology.
Tilley, P. A. 2005. “Lean design management—A new paradigm for managing the design and documentation process to improve quality?” In Proc., 13th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 283–295. Sydney, Australia: International Group for Lean Construction.
Tilley, P. A., and R. Barton. 1997. “Design and documentation deficiency—Causes and effects.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. of Construction Process Engineering, 703–712. Gold Coast, Australia: Griffith Univ.
Tilley, P. A., S. L. McFallan, and S. N. Tucker. 1999. “Design and documentation quality and its impact on the construction process.” In Proc., CIB W55 & W65 Joint Triennial Symp. Customer Satisfaction: A Focus for Research and Practice. Highett, Australia: CSIRO Building, Construction and Engineering.
Tilley, P. A., A. Wyatt, and S. Mohamed. 1997. “Indicators of design and documentation deficiency.” In Proc., 5th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 137–148. Gold Coast, Australia: Griffith Univ.
Torrington, J. 2007. “Evaluating quality of life in residential care buildings.” Build. Res. Inf. 35 (5): 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701318102.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Mar 31, 2020
Accepted: Aug 28, 2020
Published online: Dec 11, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James T. O’Connor, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
C. T. Wells Professor of Project Management, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78712. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-8609. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share