Underpricing in Social Infrastructure Projects: Combating the Institutionalization of the Winner’s Curse
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 12
Abstract
Research examining underpricing in social infrastructure projects has been limited (e.g., schools), yet this is a reality that confronts many governments worldwide. The upshot of underpricing is often contractual claims and delays, which can harm the social and economic well-being of citizens. Cognizant of experiencing potential cost overruns, this paper demonstrates that agencies within the Brazilian public sector institutionalized the winner’s curse to ensure their infrastructure projects did not exceed their budgets. This action resulted in contractors abandoning works before they were completed and, in doing so, being subjected to contractual sanctions. For the government agencies, this led to increased costs because an alternative contractor was required to complete works. The decision to accept a low bid, therefore, had the opposite of the desired effect because the final project costs exceeded their budgets. It is proposed that government agencies introduce an irresponsible bid threshold, which acts as a benchmark for determining a bid’s disqualification to address the winner’s curse phenomenon.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
Afsari, K., and C. Eastman. 2016. “A comparison of construction classification systems used for classifying building product models.” In Proc., 52nd ASC Annual Int. Conf. Fort Collins, CO: Associated Schools of Construction. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20388.27529.
Albano, G. L. 2017. “Competition in public procurement markets: Directorate for financial and enterprise affairs—Competition committee.” Acessed February 28, 2020. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/COMP/WP2(2017)1&docLanguage=En.
Ball, S. B., M. H. Bazerman, and J. S. Carroll. 1991. “An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner’s curse.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 48 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90002-B.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. Skitmore, E. Pellicer, and C. González-Cruz. 2015. “Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: A taxonomic review.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1059951.
Bazerman, M. H., and W. F. Samuelson. 1983. “I won the auction but don’t want the prize.” J. Conflict Resolut. 27 (4): 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002783027004003.
Bulow, J., and P. Klemperer. 2002. “Prices and the winner’s curse.” RAND J. Econ. 33 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696372.
CAIXA (Caixa Econômica Federal). 2019. “SINAPI: Metodologia e conceitos.” Accessed July 19, 2019. http://www.caixa.gov.br/Downloads/sinapi-manual-de-metodologias-e-conceitos/Livro_SINAPI_Metodologias_e_Conceitos_versao_digital_6_Edicao.pdf.
Capen, E. C., R. V. Clapp, and W. M. Campbell. 1971. “Competitive bidding in high-risk situations.” J. Pet. Technol. 23 (6): 641–653. https://doi.org/10.2118/2993-PA.
Felisberto, A. D. 2017. “Contribuições para elaboração de orçamento de referência de obra pública observando a nova árvore de fatores do SINAPI com BIM 5D-LOD 300.” Dissertação (mestrado), Centro Tecnológico, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Gunduz, M., and V. Karacan. 2009. “Damage to treasury: Abnormally low tenders in public construction works.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 1 (3): 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1943-4162(2009)1:3(130).
Ivanov, A., D. Levin, and M. Niederle. 2010. “Can relaxation of beliefs rationalize the winner’s curse? An experimental study.” Econometrica 78 (4): 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8112.
Kagel, J., and D. Levin. 1986. “The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions.” Am. Econ. Rev. 76 (5): 894–920.
Koch, C., and S. P. Penczynski. 2017. “The winner’s curse: Conditional reasoning and belief formation.” J. Econ. Theory 174 (Mar): 57–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.12.002.
Love, P. E. D., S. O. Cheung, Z. Irani, and P. R. Davis. 2011. “Causal discovery and inference of project disputes.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 58 (3): 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2048907.
McAfee, R. P., and J. McMillan. 1987. “Auctions and bidding.” J. Econ. Lit. 25 (2): 699–738.
Milgrom, P. 1989. “Auctions and bidding: A primer.” J. Econ. Perspect. 3 (3): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.3.3.
Mondo, B. V. 2018. Obra transparente: Monitoramento de obras de escolas e creches financiadas pelo Governo Federal. São Paulo, Brazil: Tansparência Brasil.
Moro, S. F. 2018. “Preventing systemic corruption in Brazil.” Daedalus 147 (3): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00508.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2012. OECD integrity review of Brazil: Managing risks for a cleaner public service. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2015. “Executive summary of the hearings on the use of auctions and tenders: Directorate for financial and enterprise affairs—Competition committee.” Acessed February 28, 2020. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/COMP/WP2/M(2015)1/ANN7&docLanguage=En.
Priemus, H. 2004. “Dutch contracting fraud and governance issues.” Build. Res. Inf. 32 (4): 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000221089.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, O. Olatunji, F. F. Marchiori, and W. G. Gripp. 2016. “A probabilistic method for forensic cost estimating of infrastructure projects.” Appl. Math. Modell. 40 (21–22): 9197–9211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.05.025.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, A. Oliveira, Jr., A. O. Lopes, P. S. Oliveira, Jr., and O. Olatunji. 2020. “Public infrastructure procurement: Detecting collusion in capped first priced auctions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (2): 05020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000543.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, J. J. C. B. Vallim, A. B. Raupp, and O. Olatunji. 2019. “It is not collusion unless you get caught: The case of ‘Operation Car Wash’ and unearthing of a Cartel.” J. Antitrust Enforcement 7 (2): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnz009.
Souza, U. E. L., C. S. Kato, and F. F. Marchiori. 2016. “Developing budget reference systems: Two case studies.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., CIB World Building Congress 2016, 369–381. Ottawa: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União). 2013. “Acórdão 2622/2013—Plenário.” Accessed July 24, 2019. https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/2622%252F2013/%20/DTRELEVANCIA%20desc,%20NUMACORDAOINT%20desc/0/%20?uuid=224ca6a0-ae56-11e9-810a-395b5150be8d.
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União). 2014. “Acórdão 2580/2014—Plenário.” Accessed July 15, 2019. https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/2580%252F2014/%20/DTRELEVANCIA%20desc,%20NUMACORDAOINT%20desc/0/%20?uuid=371136f0-a753-11e9-bfd9-058f2ad2616a.
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União). 2019. Acórdão 1079/2019—Plenário.” Accessed June 2, 2019. https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/*/NUMACORDAO%253A1079%2520ANOACORDAO%253A2019%2520COPIATIPO%253A%2522AC%25C3%2593RD%25C3%2583O%2522/DTRELEVANCIA%20desc,%20NUMACORDAOINT%20desc/0/%20?uuid=141b9070-8541-11e9-a9c7-6f8552b77235.
Thaler, R. H. 1988. “Anomalies: The winner’s curse.” J. Econ. Perspect. 2 (1): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.1.191.
UN (United Nations). 2017. UN procurement practitioner’s handbook, 209. New York: United Nations High-Level Committee on Management’s Procurement Network.
Ye, K., B. Li, and L. Y. Shen. 2013. “Key factors considered in compiling tender prices for China’s public works projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (3): 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000153.
Yu, W., K. Wang, and M. Wang. 2013. “Pricing strategy for best value tender.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000635.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 15, 2019
Accepted: Jun 8, 2020
Published online: Sep 24, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 24, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.