Abstract

This study analyzes the cost performance of design-build (DB) and design-bid-build (DBB) delivery systems to examine whether one project delivery system (PDS) is always superior to the other when it presents lower cost growth. Previous studies have not yet separated the effects of PDS and third factors on cost performance and have thus been unable to determine the most significant factor affecting cost performance in the comparison of DB and DBB. Bidding characteristics tend to increase project costs during the construction phase and have been recognized as the third factors associated with the PDS and cost performance. The current study employed a causal relationship model, using path analysis to distinguish the effect of the PDS and bidding characteristics on cost performance, to identify the third factors as mediators and to determine whether the mediation effect of bidding characteristics has a statistically significant effect on cost growth. Subsequently, it applied a t-test to compare the cost performance of DB and DBB delivery systems across project types, based on 197 public projects in Seoul, South Korea. The results show that the cost performance of DBB has a mediation effect on architectural building projects but not civil infrastructure projects. It indicates a condition wherein DB should not be considered superior to DBB despite the lower cost growth. Thus, PDS have the potential to be misjudged when their cost-effectiveness is mediated by bidding characteristics. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a causal relationship analysis to compare DB and DBB cost performance based on a mediation effect. The findings from the study may guide practitioners in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to evaluate and select the appropriate PDS for specific project types and provide a method to benchmark DB against DBB.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is based on the first author’s M.Sc. thesis (Moon 2015) and Ph.D. dissertation (Moon 2020). The research was supported by the Technology Innovation Program 10077606 (To Develop an Intelligent Integrated Management Support System for Engineering Project) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, South Korea. The authors are grateful to the Seoul Special City for sharing the data collected during the study.

References

Asmar, M. E., A. S. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
Bennett, J., E. Pothecary, and G. Robinson. 1996. Designing and building a world-class industry: The University of Reading design and build forum report. Reading, UK: Univ. of Reading.
Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1992. “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” Sociol. Method Res. 21 (2): 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.
Carr, P. G. 2005. “Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (11): 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165).
Chen, Q., Z. Jin, B. Xia, P. Wu, and M. Skitmore. 2016. “Time and cost performance of design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001056.
Cheung, G. W., and R. S. Lau. 2008. “Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models.” Organ. Res. Methods 11 (2): 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343.
Enders, C. K. 2001. “The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.” Psychol. Methods 6 (4): 352. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.352.
Enders, C. K., and D. L. Bandalos. 2001. “The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models.” Struct. Equation Model. 8 (3): 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.
Fernane, J. D. 2011. “Comparison of design-build and design-bid-build performance of public university projects.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Design-build effectiveness study. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Gkritza, K., and S. Labi. 2008. “Estimating cost discrepancies in highway contracts: Multistep econometric approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (12): 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:12(953).
Goftar, V. N., M. E. Asmar, and E. Bingham. 2014. “A meta-analysis of literature comparing project performance between design-build (DB) and design-bid-build (DBB) delivery systems.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 1389–1398. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hale, D. R., P. P. Shrestha, E. Gibson, and G. C. Migliaccio. 2009. “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 35 (7): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017.
Hayes, A. F. 2009. “Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium.” J. Commun. Monogr. 76 (4): 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360.
Hume, D. 1938. An abstract of a treatise of human nature (reprinted with an introduction by Keynes, J. M. and Sraffa, P.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ibbs, C. W., Y. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. M. Odabase. 2003. “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (4): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382).
Jahren, C. T., and A. M. Ashe. 1990. “Predictors of cost overrun rates.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (3): 548–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(548).
Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido. 1998. “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124: 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435).
Korkmaz, S., D. Riley, and M. Horman. 2010. “Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195.
Korkmaz, S., L. Swarup, and D. Riley. 2013. “Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: Influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (1): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000114.
Kuprenas, J. A. 2005. “Construction project cost performance prediction based on project bid characteristics.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ling, F. Y. Y., S. L. Chan, E. Chong, and L. P. Ee. 2004. “Predicting performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(75).
Liu, B., T. Huo, Y. Liang, Y. Sun, and X. Hu. 2016. “Key factors of project characteristics affecting project delivery system decision making in the Chinese construction industry: Case study using Chinese data based on rough set theory.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 142 (4): 5016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000278.
Loehlin, J. C. 1998. Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Love, P. E. D. 2002. “Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18).
MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams. 2004. “Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods.” Multivariate Behav. Res. 39 (1): 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
Minchin, R. E., X. Li, R. R. Issa, and G. G. Vargas. 2013. “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (10): 04013007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000746.
Molenaar, K., A. Songer, and M. Barash. 1999. “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 15 (2): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54).
Moon, H. 2015. “Cost performance comparison of design-build and design-bid-build focusing on mediator effect.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National Univ.
Moon, H. 2020. “Cost performance comparison of design-build and design-bid-build using moderation and mediation effects.” Doctoral dissertation. Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National Univ.
Perkins, R. A. 2009. “Sources of changes in design-build contracts for a governmental owner.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (7): 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:7(588).
Pocock, J. B., C. T. Hyun, L. Y. Liu, and M. K. Kim. 1996. “Relationship between project interaction and performance indicators.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (2): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(165).
Rosmond, J. R. 1984. “Analysis of low bidding and change order rates for navy facilities construction contracts.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School.
Roth, M. 1995. “An empirical analysis of United States Navy design/build contracts.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Satorra, A., and P. M. Bentler. 2001. “A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis.” Psychometrika 66 (4): 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.
Shrestha, P. P., and J. D. Fernane. 2017. “Performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects for public universities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (3): 04016101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001241.
Shrestha, P. P., G. C. Migliaccio, J. T. O’Connor, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2007. “Benchmarking of large design-build highway projects: One to one comparison and comparison with design-bid-build projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1994 (1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/1994-03.
Shrestha, P. P., J. T. O’Connor, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2012. “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000390.
Sobel, M. E. 1982. “Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models.” Sociol. Methodol. 13 (Jan): 290–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723.
Songer, A., and K. Molenaar. 1996. “Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitudes.” J. Manage. Eng. 124 (6): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(47).
Sullivan, J., M. E. Asmar, J. Chalhoub, and H. Obeid. 2017. “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282.
Tran, D. Q., G. Diraviam, and E. Minchin Jr. 2018. “Performance of highway design-bid-build and design-build projects by work types.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437.
Wardani, M. A. E., J. I. Messner, and M. J. Horman. 2006. “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (3): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(230).
Warne, T. R. 2005. Design build contracting for highway projects: A performance assessment. South Jordan, UT: Tom Warne & Associates.
Williams, T. P. 2005. “Bidding ratios to predict highway project costs.” Eng. Constr. Arch. Manage. 12 (1): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980510576880.
Xiong, B., M. Skitmore, and B. Xia. 2015. “A critical review of structural modeling applications in construction research.” J. Automat. Constr. 49: 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.006.
Xiong, B., and B. Xia. 2014. Examining the impacts of early cost drivers on contingencies, 1518–1527. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Oct 4, 2019
Accepted: Feb 12, 2020
Published online: Jul 7, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 7, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-3181. Email: [email protected]
Kwonhyun Kim, Ph.D. [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Psychology, Duksung Women’s Univ., Seoul 01369, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Hyun-Soo Lee, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Moonseo Park, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, Korea (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Trefor P. Williams, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers Univ., 96 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854-8014. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Bosik Son, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Namseoul Univ., Chungnam 31020, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Jae-Youl Chun, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Dankook Univ., Chungnam 31116, South Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share