Technical Papers
Apr 21, 2020

Optimum Outcome-Sharing Construction Contracts with Multiagent and Multioutcome Arrangements

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

Incentive contracts are widely used in construction to not only provide motivation but also to develop a cooperative relationship among project players. However, establishing the best outcome sharing is seen as a challenge to those involved in contracts design. Although the optimization of incentive contracts has been approached by a number of researchers, there is no guidance on optimum incentive contracts with multiagent/multioutcome arrangements. This paper develops the optimum multiagent/multioutcome sharing model in incentive contracts with a risk-neutral owner and risk-averse agents (contractors, consultants). Optimization, principal–agent theory, and utility theory provide the basis for the development. The application of the model is addressed in different scenarios. The paper demonstrates that adopting optimum effort by agents is an effective strategy that avoids project time overruns and also gives maximum savings to all contracting parties. It is shown that: at the optimum, outcome (time, cost, quality, and safety) sharing is positively related to an agent’s contribution and negatively related to the agent’s effort cost; as the correlation of the outcomes or the level of agent risk aversion increases, agents prefer low outcome sharing; and outcome variances and outcome sharing are related negatively which means that high outcome variances result in low outcome sharing. The contribution of this study lies in providing insights into designing optimum incentive contracts with multiagent/multioutcome arrangements.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Ackere, A. 1993. “The principal/agent paradigm: Its relevance to various functional fields.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 70 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90234-E.
Arditi, D., and H. M. Gunaydin. 1997. “Total quality management in the construction process.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (4): 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00076-2.
Arrow, K. 1971. Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham.
Badenfelt, U. 2008. “The selection of sharing ratios in target cost contracts.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 15 (1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810842061.
Bateson, M., D. Nettle, and G. Roberts. 2006. “Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.” Biol. Lett. 2 (3): 412–414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509.
Carmichael, D. G. 2000. Contracts and international project management. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Clemen, R., and T. Reilly. 2014. Making hard decisions with decision tools. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Davis, P. R., and D. H. Walker. 2003. “Relationship marketing: Providing opportunities and benefits for the construction industry.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 3 (2): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2003.10773044.
Department of Treasury and Finance. 2006. “Project alliancing practitioners’ guide.” Accessed November 10, 2019. http://www.dtf.vic.gov.au.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency theory: An assessment and review.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
Ekanayake, S. 2004. “Agency theory, national culture and management control systems.” J. Am. Acad. Bus. 4 (1/2): 49–54.
Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. “Separation of ownership and control.” J. Law Econ. 26 (2): 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037.
Gerybadze, A. 2011. Vol. 59 of Strategic alliances and process redesign: effective management and restructuring of cooperative projects and networks. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Harmon, K. M. J. 2003. “Conflicts between owner and contractors: Proposed intervention process.” J. Manage. Eng. 19 (3): 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:3(121).
Harris, M., and A. Raviv. 1979. “Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information.” J. Econ. Theor. 20 (2): 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(79)90073-5.
Holmstrom, B. 1979. “Moral hazard and observability.” Bell J. Econ. 10 (1): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320.
Holmstrom, B., and P. Milgrom. 1987. “Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives.” Econometrica 55 (2): 303–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913238.
Holt, G. D., P. E. D. Love, and H. Li. 2000. “The learning organization: Toward a paradigm for mutually beneficial strategic construction alliances.” Int. J. Project Manage. 18 (6): 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00066-6.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2012. “Optimal incentive contract with risk-neutral contractor.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (8): 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000663.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2013. “Optimal gainshare/painshare in alliance projects.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (8): 1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.146.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2014. “Optimal sharing arrangement for multiple project outcomes.” J. Financial Manage. Property Constr. 19 (3): 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-09-2013-0038.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2015. “Optimal outcome sharing with a consortium of contractors.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 22 (5): 655–665. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914086.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2016. “Optimization in the development of target contracts.” In Optimization and control methods in industrial engineering and construction, 259–296. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.” J. Financial Econ. 3 (4): 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
Kirkwood, C. W. 2004. “Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications.” Decis. Anal. 1 (1): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1030.0007.
Kraus, S. 1996. “An overview of incentive contracting.” J. Artif. Intell. 83 (2): 297–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00059-3.
Laan, A., H. Voordijk, and G. Dewulf. 2011. “Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 4 (4): 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111164065.
Laffont, J. J., and D. Martimort. 2001. The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Love, P., P. Davis, R. Chevis, and D. Edwards. 2011. “Risk/Reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (2): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000263.
Love, P. E. D., D. Mistry, and P. Davis. 2010. “Price competitive alliance projects: Identification of success factors for public clients.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 947–956. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000208.
Lyons, T., and M. Skitmore. 2004. “Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: A survey.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (1): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00005-X.
Meng, X., and B. Gallagher. 2012. “The impact of incentive mechanisms on project performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (3): 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.006.
Petersen, K., and M. Pedersen. 2012. “The Matrix Cook-book.” Accessed November 15, 2012. https://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi/matrixcookbook.pdf.
Rahman, M. M., and M. M. Kumaraswamy. 2002. “Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ. 20 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110089682.
Rahman, M. M., and M. M. Kumaraswamy. 2008. “Relational contracting and teambuilding: Assessing potential contractual and noncontractual incentives.” J. Manage. Eng. 24 (1): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:1(48).
Ross, J. 2003. “Introduction to project alliance (on engineering and construction projects).” In Proc., Alliance Constructing Conf. Sydney. Melbourne: PCI Group.
Shavell, S. 1979. “Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship.” Bell J. Econ. 10 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003319.
Spake, D. F., G. D’souza, T. N. Crutchfield, and R. Morgan. 1999. “Advertising agency compensation: An agency theory explanation.” J. Advertising 28 (3): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673589.
Stevens, D. E., and A. Thevaranjan. 2010. “A moral solution to the moral hazard problem.” J. Acc. Organiz. Soc. 35 (1): 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.008.
Stiglitz, J. 1974. “Risk sharing and incentives in sharecropping.” Rev. Econ. Stud. 41 (2): 219–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296714.
Sun, D., and X. Kou. 2014. “Punishment effect of prisoner dilemma game based on a new evolution strategy rule.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2014: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/108024.
Uher, E. T., and R. A. Toakley. 1999. “Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (3): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00024-6.
Walker, D., K. Hampson, and R. Peters. 2002. “Project alliancing versus project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum Project.” Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 7 (2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210425830.
Wong, P., and S. Cheung. 2004. “Trust in construction partnering: Views from parties of the partnering dance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (6): 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.001.
Wong, P., and S. Cheung. 2005. “Structural equation model of trust and partnering success.” J. Manage. Eng. 21 (2): 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:2(70).
Xianyu, B. 2012. “Prisoner’s dilemma game on complex networks with agents’ adaptive expectations.” J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 15 (3): 3. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2009.
Yeung, J. F. Y., A. P. C. Chan, and D. W. M. Chan. 2011. “Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (2): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Aug 14, 2019
Accepted: Jan 16, 2020
Published online: Apr 21, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

S. Mahdi Hosseinian [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bu-Ali Sina, Hamedan 65178-38695, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Elham Farahpour [email protected]
School of Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bu-Ali Sina, Hamedan 65178-38695, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-3488. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share