Technical Papers
Feb 14, 2020

Stackelberg Game Theory-Based Optimization Model for Design of Payment Mechanism in Performance-Based PPPs

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

Payment mechanisms lie at the heart of public-private partnership (PPP) contracts. A good design of the payment mechanism should consider the owner’s goals in the project, allocate risks appropriately to stakeholders, and assure satisfactory performance by providing reasonable compensation to the private developer. This paper proposes a Stackelberg game theory–based model to assist public agencies in designing payment mechanisms for PPP transportation projects. The interests of both public and private sectors are considered and reflected by a bilevel objective function. The model aims to search for solutions that maximize a project’s overall performance for the sake of social welfare while simultaneously maximizing return for the sake of private investment. A variable elimination method and genetic algorithm are used to solve the optimization model. A case study based on a real PPP project is discussed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed model. The solutions provided by the model reveal that the optimal payment mechanism structure could be established such that it would satisfy owners’ requirements for overall project performance while optimizing project total payments to contractors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online (Shang 2019) in accordance with funder data retention policies. Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request, such as the code of the GA to solve the proposed model.

References

Abdel Aziz, A. M. 2007a. “Successful delivery of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (12): 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(918).
Abdel Aziz, A. M. 2007b. “A survey of the payment mechanisms for transportation DBFO projects in British Columbia.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 25 (5): 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190601161465.
Allende, G. B., and G. Still. 2013. “Solving bilevel programs with the KKT-approach.” Math. Program. 138 (1–2): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-012-0535-x.
Anastasopoulos, P. C., M. T. Sarwar, and V. N. Shankar. 2016. “Safety-oriented pavement performance thresholds: Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in a multi-objective optimization and goal programming approach.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 12 (Dec): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.10.001.
Bard, J. F., and J. T. Moore. 1990. “A branch and bound algorithm for the bilevel programming problem.” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 11 (2): 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1137/0911017.
Britain, G. 2012. A new approach to public private partnerships. London: HM Treasury.
Brotcorne, L., M. Labbé, P. Marcotte, and G. Savard. 2001. “A bilevel model for toll optimization on a multicommodity transportation network.” Transp. Sci. 35 (4): 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.4.345.10433.
Buxbaum, J. N., and I. N. Ortiz. 2007. Protecting the public interest: The role of long-term concession agreements for providing transportation infrastructure. Los Angeles: Keston Institute for Public Finance Policy and Infrastructure Policy, Univ. of Southern California.
Chan, A. P., D. Scott, and A. P. Chan. 2004. “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
Constantin, I., and M. Florian. 1995. “Optimizing frequencies in a transit network: A nonlinear bi-level programming approach.” Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2 (2): 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.1995.tb00011.x.
Côté, J.-P., P. Marcotte, and G. Savard. 2003. “A bilevel modelling approach to pricing and fare optimisation in the airline industry.” J. Revenue Pricing Manage. 2 (1): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170046.
Cui, Q., X. Zhu, and A. D’Alessio. 2017. “Public-private partnership: A design issue.” In Proc., 2017 IEEE Symp. Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), 1–6. New York: IEEE.
Deb, K. 2014. “Multi-objective optimization.” In Search methodologies, 403–449. New York: Springer.
Department of the Environment and Local Government. 2000. Public private partnership guidance note. Dublin, Ireland: Dept. of the Environment and Local Government.
DOT. 2016. Successful practices for P3s: A review of what works when delivering transportation via public-private partnerships. Washington, DC : USDOT Build America Transportation Investment Center.
EIB (European Investment Bank). 2011. The guide to guidance: How to prepare, procure and deliver PPP projects. Luxembourg: European PPP Expertise Centre Luxembourg.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018a. “FHWA public private partnerships toolkit.” Accessed December 31, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/toolkit/.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018b. “Project profile: I-595 corridor roadway improvements.” Accessed December 31, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/fl_i595.aspx.
Garvin, M. J. 2010. “Enabling development of the transportation public-private partnership market in the United States.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (4): 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000122.
Ghotbi, E. 2013. “Bi- and multi level game theoretic approaches in mechanical design.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin Milwaukee.
Goel, T., R. Vaidyanathan, R. T. Haftka, W. Shyy, N. V. Queipo, and K. Tucker. 2007. “Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (4–6): 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.07.010.
Goepel, K. D. 2013. “Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises–a new AHP Excel template with multiple inputs.” In Vol. 2013 of Proc., Int. Symp. on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1–10. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Creative Decisions Foundation Kuala Lumpur.
Hansen, P., B. Jaumard, and G. Savard. 1992. “New branch-and-bound rules for linear bilevel programming.” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13 (5): 1194–1217. https://doi.org/10.1137/0913069.
Harter, D. E., M. S. Krishnan, and S. A. Slaughter. 2000. “Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development.” Manage. Sci. 46 (4): 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.451.12056.
Hearn, D. W., and M. V. Ramana. 1998. “Solving congestion toll pricing models.” In Equilibrium and advanced transportation modelling, 109–124. Boston: Springer.
HM Treasury. 2003. PFI: Meeting the investment challenge. London: HM Treasury.
HM Treasury. 2007. Standardisation of PFI contracts. London: HM Treasury.
Kara, B. Y., and V. Verter. 2004. “Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation.” Transp. Sci. 38 (2): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1030.0065.
Kim, I. Y., and O. De Weck. 2006. “Adaptive weighted sum method for multiobjective optimization: A new method for Pareto front generation.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 31 (2): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-005-0557-6.
Larsson, T., and M. Patriksson. 1998. “Side constrained traffic equilibrium models-traffic management through link tolls.” In Equilibrium and advanced transportation modelling, 125–151. New York: Springer.
Leblanc, L. J. 1973. “Mathematical programming algorithms for large scale network equilibrium and network design problems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Northwestern Univ.
Lieberman, M. B., and D. B. Montgomery. 1988. “First-mover advantages.” Strategic Manage. J. 9 (S1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090706.
Marcotte, P. 1986. “Network design problem with congestion effects: A case of bilevel programming.” Math. Program. 34 (2): 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580580.
Marler, R. T., and J. S. Arora. 2010. “The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: New insights.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 41 (6): 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7.
Mathieu, R., L. Pittard, and G. Anandalingam. 1994. “Genetic algorithm based approach to bi-level linear programming.” RAIRO-Oper. Res. 28 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/1994280100011.
Meng, X. 2012. “The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (2): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.04.002.
Miettinen, K. 2012. Vol. 12 of Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Mladenovic, G., and C. Queiroz. 2014. “Assessing the financial feasibility of availability payment PPP projects.” In T&DI Congress 2014: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, 602–611. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ngatchou, P., A. Zarei, and A. El-Sharkawi. 2005. “Pareto multi objective optimization.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems, 84–91. New York: IEEE.
Oduguwa, V., and R. Roy. 2002. “Bi-level optimisation using genetic algorithm.” In Proc., 2002 IEEE Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICAIS 2002), 322–327. New York: IEEE.
Oyedele, L. O. 2012. “Avoiding performance failure payment deductions in PFI/PPP projects: Model of critical success factors.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000367.
PPP Knowledge Lab. 2018. “PPP reference guide.” Accessed December 31, 2019. https://pppknowledgelab.org/guide/sections/63-payment-mechanism.
Rangel, T., J. M. Vassallo, and B. Arenas. 2012. “Effectiveness of safety-based incentives in public private partnerships: Evidence from the case of Spain.” Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract. 46 (8): 1166–1176.
Rangel, T., J. M. Vassallo, and I. Herraiz. 2013. “The influence of economic incentives linked to road safety indicators on accidents: The case of toll concessions in Spain.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 59 (Oct): 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.014.
Rao, S. S., and T. Freiheit. 1991. “A modified game theory approach to multiobjective optimization.” J. Mech. Des. 113 (3): 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2912781.
Sandborn, P., A. R. Kashani-Pour, X. Zhu, and Q. Cui. 2014. A new availability-payment model for pricing performance-based logistics contracts. College Park, MD: Maryland Univ. College Park Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering (CALCE).
Sarwar, M. T., and P. C. Anastasopoulos. 2017. “The effect of long term non-invasive pavement deterioration on accident injury-severity rates: A seemingly unrelated and multivariate equations approach.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 13 (Mar): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.10.003.
Scott, S. 2006. Vol. 561 of Best-value procurement methods for highway construction projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Shang, L. 2019. “Stackelberg game theory based optimization model and data.” Accessed December 31, 2019. https://github.com/ls3053/Stackelberg-Game-Theory-Based-Optimization-Model-.git.
Shang, L., and A. A. Aziz. 2018. “The USA PPP payment mechanisms: A comparison to the Canadian PPP systems.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 129–138. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sharma, D., and Q. Cui. 2012. “Design of concession and annual payments for availability payment public private partnership (PPP) projects.” In Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, 2290–2299. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sinha, A., P. Malo, and K. Deb. 2018. “A review on bilevel optimization: From classical to evolutionary approaches and applications.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22 (2): 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2017.2712906.
USDOT. 2009. “I-595 corridor roadway improvements: Value for money analysis.” Accessed December 31, 2019. https://www.transportation.gov/tifia/financed-projects/i-595-corridor-roadway-improvements.
Vaidya, O. S., and S. Kumar. 2006. “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
Vassallo, J., T. Rangel, P. Pérez de Villar, and B. Arenas. 2009. “Do PPP contracts improve road safety?” Research Paper. Madrid, Spain: EIB Univ. Research Sponsorship Programme, Politechnic Univ. of Madrid.
Vassallo, J. M., and J. Gallego. 2005. “Risk sharing in the new public works concession law in Spain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1932 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193200101.
Whitley, D. 1994. “A genetic algorithm tutorial.” Stat. Comput. 4 (2): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175354.
Yang, H., S. Yagar, Y. Iida, and Y. Asakura. 1994. “An algorithm for the inflow control problem on urban freeway networks with user-optimal flows.” Transp. Res. B: Methodol. 28 (2): 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)90021-3.
Yescombe, E. R. 2011. Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Yin, Y. 2000. “Genetic-algorithms-based approach for bilevel programming models.” J. Transp. Eng. 126 (2): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:2(115).
Zahedi, F. 1986. “The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications.” Interfaces 16 (4): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Apr 30, 2019
Accepted: Oct 1, 2019
Published online: Feb 14, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, College of Built Environment, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, 120F Architecture Hall, Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-6087. Email: [email protected]
Ahmed M. Abdel Aziz, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, 120F Architecture Hall, Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share