Technical Papers
Jan 27, 2020

Development of Assessment Tool for Workforce Sustainability

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

The work environment in construction is physically and mentally demanding. This demanding environment can place adverse risk on the construction workforce including emotional, physical, and financial challenges. To minimize such challenges, continued development and cultivation of the construction workforce is required. Continued development and cultivation can sustain the workforce and lead to both personal and business growth. The process of developing and cultivating the workforce enhances construction workforce sustainability, a measure of the social sustainability of the construction workforce. The aim of the present study is to develop a practical tool for assessing workforce sustainability in construction. A mixed-methods research approach that relied on a review of literature, semistructured interviews, and a multiround expert survey was utilized to achieve the aim of the study. The developed workforce sustainability tool includes three levels of components (attributes, indicators, and metrics) organized in a hierarchy to characterize a workforce. The use of the assessment tool yields a final aggregated score that reveals the level of sustainability of a workforce. The present study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a means to assess and ultimately improve workforce sustainability in construction. Widespread use of the tool is expected to help the construction industry develop and nurture its workers to produce a healthy, productive, and resilient workforce.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible through research funding obtained from the Center for Construction Research and Training (CPWR) through Cooperative Agreement No. U60-OH009762 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Opinions and views expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CPWR or NIOSH. The authors thank CPWR and NIOSH for providing funding to conduct this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank the expert panelists who participated in the study for their time and input.

References

Abdelhamid, T., and J. Everett. 2000. “Identifying root causes of construction accidents.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (1): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(52).
Allmon, E., C. Haas, J. Borcherding, and P. Goodrum. 2000. “US construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (2): 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:2(97).
Alomari, K., J. Gambatese, and N. Tymvios. 2018. “Risk perception comparison among construction safety professionals: Delphi perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (12): 04018107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001565.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2018. “National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2017.” Accessed February 7, 2019. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf.
Certificated B Corporation. 2019. “About B Corps.” Accessed December 9, 2019. https://bcorporation.net/about-b-corps.
Chan, A., E. Yung, P. Lam, C. Tam, and S. Cheung. 2001. “Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 19 (7): 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110066128.
Choi, S. D. 2009. “Safety and ergonomic considerations for an aging workforce in the US construction industry.” Work 33 (3): 307–315. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2009-0878.
CPWR (Center for Construction Research and Training). 2018. The construction chart book: The US construction industry and its workers. 6th ed. Silver Spring, MD: CPWR.
CSR Report. 2017. “SK E&C 2017 corporate social responsibility report: Deep change for the great.” Accessed May 7, 2019. http://www.skec.com/file_download/2017_SKEC_CSR_Report_ENG.pdf.
Escamilla, E., and M. Ostadalimakhmalbaf. 2016. “Capacity building for sustainable workforce in the construction industry.” Prof. Constructor 41 (1): 51–62.
FMI (Fails Management Institute). 2017. “FMI releases 2017 talent development study.” Accessed January 8, 2017. https://www.fminet.com/news/2017/10/19/fmi-releases-2017-talent-development-study/.
Gambatese, J., A. Karakhan, and D. Simmons. 2019. Development of a workforce sustainability model for construction. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Construction Research and Training.
Gunhan, S., and D. Arditi. 2005. “Factors affecting international construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (3): 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(273).
Hallowell, M., and J. Gambatese. 2010. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Hinze, J. 2010. Construction contracts. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hinze, J., R. Godfrey, and J. Sullivan. 2013. “Integration of construction worker safety and health in assessment of sustainable construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000651.
Ho, P. 2016. “Labour and skill shortages in Hong Kong’s construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 23 (4): 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2014-0165.
Holden, S., and R. Y. Sunindijo. 2018. “Technology, long work hours, and stress worsen work-life balance in the construction industry.” Int. J. Integr. Eng. Penerbit UTHM 10 (2): 13–18.
Jafari, A., V. Valentin, and S. M. Bogus. 2019. “Identification of social sustainability criteria in building energy retrofit projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001610.
Jones, K. 2016. “Construction leads all industries in total worker health. Construct connect.” Accessed May 10, 2019. https://www.constructconnect.com/blog/construction-news/construction-leads-industries-worker-deaths.
JUST. 2017. “JUST program.” Accessed June 10, 2017. https://living-future.org/just/.
Kibert, C. J. 2016. Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kossek, E., M. Valcour, and P. Lirio. 2014. “The sustainable workforce organizational strategies for promoting work-life balance and wellbeing.” In Wellbeing: A complete reference guide: Work and wellbeing, edited by P. Y. Chen and C. L. Cooper, 295–318. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. 2019. “LEED v4.1.” Accessed December 9, 2019. https://new.usgbc.org/leed-v41.
Leon, H., H. Osman, M. Georgy, and M. Elsaid. 2017. “System dynamics approach for forecasting performance of construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 34 (1): 04017049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000575.
Lingard, H., V. Francis, and M. Turner. 2010. “Work-family conflict in construction: Case for a finer-grained analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (11): 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000229.
Lippe, T., and Z. Lippényi. 2019. Investments in a sustainable workforce in Europe. 1st ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Mitchell, V. 1991. “The Delphi technique: An exposition and application.” Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 3 (4): 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329108524065.
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2016. “Sustainability in the workforce: A new approach for advancing worker safety and health.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.osha.gov/sustainability/docs/OSHA_sustainability_paper.pdf.
Pacuit, E., and S. Salame. 2006. “Majority logic: Axiomatization and completeness.” Stud. Logica 4 (1): 1–36.
Pfeffer, J. 2010. “Building sustainable organizations: The human factor.” Academy Manage. Perspect. 24 (1): 34–45.
Probst, T., L. Goldenhar, J. Byrd, and E. Betit. 2019. “The safety climate assessment tool (S-CAT): A rubric-based approach to measuring construction safety climate.” J. Saf. Res. 69 (Jun): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.004.
Raheem, M., and C. Ramsbottom. 2016. “Factors affecting social sustainability in highway projects in Missouri.” Procedia Eng. 145 (Jan): 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.043.
Rogers, M., and E. Lopez. 2002. “Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies.” J. Sch. Psychol. 40 (2): 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00093-6.
Rojas, E., and P. Aramvareekul. 2003. “Is construction labor productivity really declining?” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (1): 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(41).
Schwatka, N., L. Butler, and J. Rosecrance. 2011. “An aging workforce and injury in the construction industry.” Epidemiol. Rev. 34 (1): 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr020.
Sierra, L., E. Pellicer, and V. Yepes. 2015. “Social sustainability in the lifecycle of Chilean public infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (5): 05015020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001099.
Sourani, A., and M. Sohail. 2015. “The Delphi method: Review and use in construction management research.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 11 (1): 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.917132.
Suhr, J. 1999. The choosing by advantages decision making system. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and L. Klotz. 2012. “Social sustainability considerations during planning and design: Framework of processes for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000566.
Vecchio-Sadus, A., and S. Griffiths. 2004. “Marketing strategies for enhancing safety culture.” Saf. Sci. 42 (7): 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2003.11.001.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
World Happiness Report. 2017. World happiness report 2017. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Yeung, J., A. Chan, and D. Chan. 2009. “Developing a performance index for relationship-based construction projects in Australia: Delphi study.” J. Manage. Eng. 25 (2): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:2(59).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Mar 6, 2019
Accepted: Sep 10, 2019
Published online: Jan 27, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali A. Karakhan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-6441. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 460D Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3401-2048. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share