Technical Papers
Sep 28, 2019

Reducing Damage to Underground Utilities: Lessons Learned from Damage Data and Excavators in North Carolina

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 12

Abstract

Damages to underground utilities are unfortunately a common occurrence on many construction projects. Damaging an underground utility during construction often leads to work delay, road closures, social costs, and safety accidents. Through a combination of damage data analysis and a construction practitioner survey, this paper examined the current deficiencies in damage prevention efforts as well as the possible root causes. Understanding the current root causes that contribute the most to underground utility damages presents opportunities to reduce future damages. The analyses presented in this paper are the result of a survey completed by 477 excavators who experienced the current damage prevention efforts. Data on 11,160 damages in the state of North Carolina were collected and analyzed. The key contributions of the study include, among others, recommendations to improve education material, tailoring construction firms’ plans to address locating delay and inaccuracy, and improving utility owners’ locating efforts. Accordingly, the findings can help the industry improve its efforts to reduce the damages to underground utilities and enhance the performance of construction projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

Funding to undertake this study was provided by the NC 811.

References

Al-Bayati, A. J., and L. Panzer. 2019. “Requirements and practices of underground construction activities: A review of recently updated act.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000300.
Al-Bayati, A. J., L. Panzer, and A. Karakhan. 2019. “Reducing damages to underground infrastructure: Performance evaluation of one-call notification program.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (4): 04019018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000441.
Ariaratnam, S. T., K. Piratla, A. Cohen, and M. Olson. 2013. “Quantification of sustainability index for underground utility infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (12): A4013002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000763.
Ariaratnam, S. T., and J. J. Proszek. 2006. “Legal consequences of damages to underground facilities by horizontal directional drilling.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 132 (4): 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:4(342).
ASCE. 2003. Standard guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data. ASCE 38-02. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bilal, M., W. Khan, J. Muggleton, E. Rustighi, H. Jenks, S. R. Pennock, P. R. Atkins, and A. Cohn. 2018. “Inferring the most probable maps of underground utilities using Bayesian mapping model.” J. Appl. Geophys. 150 (Mar): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.01.006.
Celik, T., S. Kamali, and Y. Arayici. 2017. “Social cost in construction project.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 64 (May): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.001.
CGA (Common Ground Alliance). 2016. “DIRT analysis and recommendations 2016.” Accessed August 12, 2019. http://commongroundalliance.com/DIRT-2016-report.
CGA (Common Ground Alliance). 2017. “DIRT analysis and recommendations 2017.” Accessed August 12, 2019. http://commongroundalliance.com/media-reports/dirt-report-2017.
CGA (Common Ground Alliance). 2018. “Damage information reporting tool.” Accessed November 18, 2018. http://commongroundalliance.com/dirt-dashboard.
Goodrum, P., A. Smith, B. Slaughter, and F. Kari. 2008. “Case study and statistical analysis of utility conflicts on construction roadway projects and best practices in their avoidance.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 134 (2): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:2(63).
Hyari, K., and K. El-Rayes. 2006. “Optimal planning and scheduling for repetitive construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 22 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597x(2006)22:1(11).
Kolera, B. T., and L. E. Bernold. 2006. “Intelligent utility locating tool for excavators.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (9): 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:9(919).
Li, S., H. Cai, and V. R. Kamat. 2015. “Uncertainty-aware geospatial system for mapping and visualizing underground utilities.” Autom. Constr. 53 (May): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.011.
Mahalingam, A., and R. E. Levitt. 2007. “Safety issues on global projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (7): 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:7(506).
Makana, L. O., N. Metje, I. Jefferson, M. Sackey, and C. D. F. Rogers. 2018. “Cost estimation of utility strikes: Towards proactive management of street works.” Infrastruct. Asset Manage. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.17.00033.
Metje, N., B. Ahmad, and S. M. Crossland. 2015. “Causes, impacts and costs of strikes on buried utility assets.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 68 (3): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.14.00035.
Nelson, C. M., R. H. Iwasaki, R. K. Arulraj, and M. E. Ayers. 2012. “SHRP 2 tools for underground utility location, data collection, and analysis.” Accessed November 12, 2018. http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/166876.aspx.
Quiroga, C., and J. Anspach. 2016. “Managing utilities in 3D design and construction workflow.” In Proc., Pipelines. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sterling, R. 2000. Utility locating technologies: A summary of responses to a statement of need distributed by the Federal laboratory consortium for technology transfer. Ruston, LA: Louisiana Tech Univ.
Sweeney, M. 2010. “Clearing the utilities on time and under budget.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 10 (1): 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000039.
Talmaki, S., and V. R. Kamat. 2014. “Real-time hybrid virtuality for prevention of excavation related utility strikes.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (3): 04014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000269.
Talmaki, S., V. R. Kamat, and H. Cai. 2013. “geometric modeling of geospatial data for visualization-assisted excavation.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 27 (2): 283–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.01.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 12December 2019

History

Received: Dec 16, 2018
Accepted: Apr 24, 2019
Published online: Sep 28, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638 [email protected]
P.E.
OSHA Authorized Trainer and Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ., 21000 West Ten Mile Rd., Southfield, MI 48075 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638. Email: [email protected]
Louis Panzer [email protected]
Executive Director, North Carolina 811, 5009 High Point Rd., Greensboro, NC 27407. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share