Technical Papers
Sep 11, 2019

Unveiling Cognitive Biases in Construction Project Dispute Resolution through the Lenses of Third-Party Neutrals

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 11

Abstract

Cognitive biases would jeopardize the quality of decisions, yet people are reluctant to admit to being affected. This study explores the types of cognitive bias that may have influences on construction project dispute resolution (CPDR) decisions. Effects of cognitive biases are first operationalized as biased behaviors. Third-party neutrals, including arbitrators, adjudicators, and mediators, were asked to report their observations of disputing parties’ biased practices. The use of third-party neutrals aims to improve the objectivity of the data on disputing parties’ biased behaviors. Principal component factor analysis (PCFA) on the collected responses suggested four types of cognitive bias: preconception, self-affirmation, optimism, and interest-oriented biases. Among these, interest-oriented bias was found to be the most prominent. This study contributes to CPDR management by proposing bias-minimizing measures. Fuzzy-set linguistic evaluations were employed to assess the usefulness of the measures in view of the nondiscrete nature of the assessments. The findings were further validated through semistructured interviews with experienced dispute management experts. The contributions of the study include: (1) raising the awareness of the potential types of cognitive bias that would affect decisions in CPDR, (2) enhancing the role of third-party neutrals in directing disputing parties away from influences of biases, (3) reminding disputing parties not to undervalue the proposals of the counterparts, and (4) improving dispute management by suggesting a review of all options available at each round of dispute negotiation. Having experienced third-party neutrals as respondents is also a major breakthrough in the study of behaviors of disputing parties. The findings are invaluable to construction professional communities in general and to disputing parties and third-party neutrals in particular.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This study was fully supported by a HKSAR RGC GRF (Project No. 11209118). Special thanks go to the members of the Society of Construction Law Hong Kong (SCLHK), who had kindly provided data for the study.

References

Alexander, F. G. 1980. Psychoanalytic therapy: Principles and application. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Alvarez, J. F. A., A. Pustina, and M. Hällgren. 2011. “Escalating commitment in the death zone: New insights from the 1996 Mount Everest disaster.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (8): 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.013.
Anderson, C. A. 1982. “Inoculation and counterexplanation: Debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories.” Soc. Cognit. 1 (2): 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1982.1.2.126.
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. 1st ed. New York: Harper.
Arkes, H. R. 1991. “Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.” Psychol. Bull. 110 (3): 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486.
Ashton, R. H., and J. Kennedy. 2002. “Eliminating recency with self-review: The case of auditors’ ‘going concern’ judgments.” J. Behav. Decis. Making 15 (3): 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.412.
Babcock, L., and G. Loewenstein. 1997. “Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases.” J. Econ. Perspect. 11 (1): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.1.109.
Baron, R. A. 1991. “Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective.” Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 4 (1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390436.
Bazerman, M. H., J. R. Curhan, D. A. Moore, and K. L. Valley. 2000. “Negotiation.” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51 (1): 279–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279.
Bazerman, M. H., and M. A. Neale. 1982. “Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: The role of selection and training.” J. Appl. Psychol. 67 (5): 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.543.
Bentz, B. G., D. A. Williamson, and S. F. Franks. 2004. “Debiasing of pessimistic judgments associated with anxiety.” J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 26 (3): 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000022109.68806.01.
Burke, A. 2007. “Neutralizing cognitive bias: An invitation to prosecutors.” NYUJL Liberty 2 (3): 512–530.
Cerny, B. A., and H. F. Kaiser. 1977. “A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices.” Multivariate Behav. Res. 12 (1): 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3.
Chapman, G. B., and B. H. Bornstein. 1996. “The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts.” Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 10 (6): 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6%3C519::AID-ACP417%3E3.0.CO;2-5.
Chapman, G. B., and E. J. Johnson. 2002. “Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value.” In Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, edited by T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 120–138. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cheung, S. O., and K. H. Y. Pang. 2013. “Anatomy of construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532.
Cheung, S. O., P. S. Wong, and A. W. Wu. 2011. “Towards an organizational culture framework in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.014.
Conlisk, J. 1996. “Why bounded rationality?” J. Econ. Lit. 34 (2): 669–700.
Croskerry, P., G. Singhal, and S. Mamede. 2013. “Cognitive debiasing 2: Impediments to and strategies for change.” Supplement, BMJ Qual. Saf. 22 (S2): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713.
Cusick, W. 2009. All customers are irrational. New York: AMACOM.
Drolet, A. L., and M. W. Morris. 2000. “Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts.” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36 (1): 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1395.
Epley, N., and T. Gilovich. 2006. “The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic Why the adjustments are insufficient.” Psychol. Sci. 17 (4): 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x.
Evans, J. S. B. 2003. “In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning.” Trends Cognit. Sci. 7 (10): 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012.
Fischhoff, B., and R. Beyth-Marom. 1983. “Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective.” Psychol. Rev. 90 (3): 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239.
Fisher, R., W. L. Ury, and B. Patton. 2011. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.
Forgas, J. P. 1995. “Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).” Psychol. Bull. 117 (1): 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39.
Galinsky, A. D., and G. Ku. 2004. “The effects of perspective taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation.” Personality. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30 (5): 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262802.
Galinsky, A. D., and G. B. Moskowitz. 2000. “Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.” J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 78 (4): 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708.
Galinsky, A. D., and T. Mussweiler. 2001. “First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 81 (4): 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.657.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
Haji-Kazemi, S., B. Andersen, and O. J. Klakegg. 2015. “Barriers against effective responses to early warning signs in projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (5): 1068–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.002.
Hammond, J. S., R. L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa. 1998. “The hidden traps in decision making.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 76 (5): 47–58.
Hastie, R. 2001. “Problems for judgment and decision making.” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 (1): 653–683. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.653.
Heiman, V. B. 1990. “Auditors’ assessments of the likelihood of error explanations in analytical review.” Account. Rev. 65 (4): 875–890.
Hirt, E. R., and K. D. Markman. 1995. “Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 69 (6): 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069.
Hoch, S. J. 1985. “Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events.” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 11 (4): 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.719.
Idrus, A., M. F. Nuruddin, and M. A. Rohman. 2011. “Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system.” Expert. Syst. Appl. 38 (3): 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.061.
Kahneman, D. 2003. “Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics.” Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (5): 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392.
Kaiser, H. F. 1958. “The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.” Psychometrika 23 (3): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233.
Kennedy, J. 1995. “Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment.” Account. Rev. 70 (2): 249–273.
Keren. G., and K. H. Teigen. 2004. “Yet another look at the heuristics and biases approach.” In Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 89–109. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Kline, P. 1993. Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
Koriat, A., S. Lichtenstein, and B. Fischhoff. 1980. “Reasons for confidence.” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 6 (2): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107.
Kray, L. J., and A. D. Galinsky. 2003. “The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 91 (1): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4.
Landa, Y., S. M. Silverstein, F. Schwartz, and A. Savitz. 2006. “Group cognitive behavioral therapy for delusions: Helping patients improve reality testing.” J. Contemp. Psychother. 36 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-005-9001-x.
Larrick, R. P. 2004. “Debiasing.” In Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, edited by D. J. Koehler and N. Harvey, 316–338. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Lefley, F. 2006. “Can a project champion bias project selection and, if so, how can we avoid it?” Manage. Res. News. 29 (4): 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610665031.
Li, K., and S. O. Cheung. 2016. “The potential of bias in multi-tier construction dispute resolution processes.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 32nd Annual ARCOM Conf., edited by P. W. Chan and C. J. Neilson, 197–205. Manchester, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Li, K., and S. O. Cheung. 2018. “Bias measurement scale for repeated dispute evaluations.” J. Manag. Eng. 34 (4): 04018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000617.
Lin, Q. L., L. Liu, H. C. Liu, and D. J. Wang. 2013. “Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with fuzzy linguistic for evaluating operating room performance in hospitals.” Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (6): 1917–1924.
Lord, C. G., M. R. Lepper, and E. Preston. 1984. “Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 47 (6): 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231.
Lyons, C. 2009. I win, you win: The essential guide to principled negotiation. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Matsunaga, M. 2010. “How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s.” Int. J. Psychol. Res. 3 (1): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854.
Mowen, J. C., and G. J. Gaeth. 1992. “The evaluation stage in marketing decision making.” J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 20 (2): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723457.
Mussweiler, T., B. Englich, and F. Strack. 2004. “Anchoring effect.” In Cognitive illusions—A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory, edited by R. Pohl, 183–200. London: Psychology Press.
Mussweiler, T., F. Strack, and T. Pfeiffer. 2000. “Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility.” Personality Social Psychol. Bull. 26 (9): 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611010.
Newell, A., and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pinto, J. K. 2013. “Lies, damned lies, and project plans: Recurring human errors that can ruin the project planning process.” Bus. Horiz. 56 (5): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.05.006.
Reynolds, W. M. 1982. “Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.” J. Clin. Psychol. 38 (1): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1%3C119::AID-JCLP2270380118%3E3.0.CO;2-I.
Sanna, L. J., and N. Schwarz. 2004. “Integrating temporal biases.” Psychol. Sci. 15 (7): 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x.
Schulz-Hardt, S., M. Jochims, and D. Frey. 2002. “Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 88 (2): 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00001-8.
Schwenk, C. R., and R. A. Cosier. 1980. “Effects of the expert, devil’s advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 26 (3): 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(80)90076-8.
Sedikides, C., W. K. Campbell, G. D. Reeder, and A. J. Elliot. 1998. “The self-serving bias in relational context.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 74 (2): 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378.
Shaheen, A. A., A. R. Fayek, and S. M. AbouRizk. 2007. “Fuzzy numbers in cost range estimating.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (4): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:4(325).
Simon, H. A. 1955. “A behavioral model of rational choice.” Q. J. Econ. 69 (1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.
Simon, H. A. 1979. “Rational decision making in business organizations.” Am. Econ. Rev. 69 (4): 493–513.
Singh, D., and L. K. Tiong. 2005. “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(62).
Soll, J., K. Milkman, and J. Payne. 2014. “A user’s guide to debiasing.” In The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. 1st ed., edited by G. Keren and G. Wu, 924–951. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Thaler, R. H. 2015. Misbehaving: The making of behavioural economics. New York: W.W. Norton Company.
Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2008. NUDGE: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Yale University Press.
Thompson, L. L., and B. J. Lucas. 2000. “Judgmental biases in conflict resolution and how to overcome them.” In The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, 255–282. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Williams, J. 2017. “Accountability as a debiasing strategy: Testing the effect of racial diversity in employment committees.” Iowa Law Rev. 103: 1593–1638.
Wilson, T. 2002. Strangers to ourselves : Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Wong, P. S., S. O. Cheung, and P. K. Ho. 2005. “Contractor as trust initiator in construction partnering—Prisoner’s dilemma perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (10): 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1045).
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zhao, J., and B. K. Bose. 2002. “Evaluation of membership functions for fuzzy logic controlled induction motor drive.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., IEEE 28th Annual Conf. of Ind. Electron. Society, 229–234. New York: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Oct 30, 2018
Accepted: Mar 12, 2019
Published online: Sep 11, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 11, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Member, Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-7459. Email: [email protected]
Sai On Cheung, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share