Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2019

Identifying Team Selection and Alignment Factors by Delivery Method for Transportation Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 10

Abstract

One critical antecedent to project success is team alignment. Industry professionals should focus on practices that can improve project team selection, team building, and identifying challenges to the team and project, hence improving alignment. This paper provides a summary of key findings of a national study of transportation projects, identifying current practices of industry professionals for the selection and alignment of project teams for transportation projects. Current team selection practices, the most beneficial team alignment practices, and the greatest challenges to team alignment are identified in the study. These practices are also analyzed and reported by project delivery method, and the results presented in this paper add to the body of knowledge by identifying current alignment practices, successful practices, and challenges specific to each delivery method. Among the findings are that overall project teams are selected primarily based on project experience and ability to meet schedule, regardless of the project delivery method chosen. Successful teams with good alignment were found to be characterized by having established expectations, team trust, honesty within the team, shared values, and good communication. No notable differences were found among delivery methods, demonstrating that the principles of team alignment are not dependent on the project delivery method. Challenges that cause adversarial relationships in the team include issues of constructability, schedule availability, and project complexity. The study also identified transportation-specific alignment challenges such as public involvement. The greatest challenges specific to each delivery method include team coordination for construction manager at risk (CMAR) projects, constructability procedures for design-bid-build projects, and environmental impacts for design-build projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Alshawi, M., and I. Faraj. 2002. “Integrated construction environments: Technology and implementation.” Constr. Innovation 2 (1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170210814676.
Ankrah, N. A., D. Proverbs, and Y. Debrah. 2009. “Factors influencing the culture of a construction project organisation: An empirical investigation.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 16 (1): 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980910927877.
Baiden, B. K., and A. D. F. Price. 2011. “The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (2): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016.
Baiden, B. K., A. D. F. Price, and A. R. J. Dainty. 2006. “The extent of team integration within construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001.
Ballard, G. 2008. “The lean project delivery system: An update.” Lean Constr. J. 2008: 1–19.
Bingham, E. 2014. Analysis of the state of practice and best practices for alternative project delivery methods in the transportation design and construction industry. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State Univ.
Burke, J. 2014. “Defining team cultures within your company.” Accessed August 28, 2018. https://www.352inc.com/blog/defining-team-cultures-within-your-company/.
Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., S. B. Costello, and S. Wilkinson. 2015. “Key indicators influencing the management of team integration in construction projects.” Int. J. Managing Project. Bus. 8 (2): 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2014-0028.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1989. Partnering: Meeting the challenges of the future. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1994a. Benchmarking implementation results, teambuilding and project partnering. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1994b. Pre-project planning: Beginning a project the right way. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1997. Pre-project planning tools: PDRI and alignment. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2017. Best practices. Knowledge base. Accessed August 28, 2018. https://www.construction-institute.org/resources/knowledgebase/best-practices.
Dave, B., and L. Koskela. 2009. “Collaborative knowledge management: A construction case study.” Autom. Constr. 18 (7): 894–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.03.015.
DeGroot, M. H., and M. J. Schervish. 2012. Probability and statistics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
El Asmar, M. 2018. “Transportation project delivery: Alternative contracting methods research.” TR News, July/August 2018.
El Asmar, M., A. S. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2016. “Evaluating integrated project delivery using the project quarterback rating.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001015.
Ernzen, J., and C. Schexnayder. 2000. “One company’s experience with design/build: Labor cost risk and profit potential.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (1): 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(10).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018a. Alternative contracting method performance in U.S. highway construction. FHWA, US Dept. of Transportation.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018b. Special experimental projects no. 14: Alternative contracting (formerly innovative contracting). Accessed February 7, 2018. www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/sep_a.cfm.
Francom, T., M. El Asmar, and S. T. Ariaratnam. 2016. “Performance analysis of construction manager at risk on pipeline engineering and construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 04016016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000456.
Graetz, F. 2000. “Strategic change leadership.” Manage. Dec. 38 (8): 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010378282.
Gransberg, D. D., C. Lopez del Puerto, and R. M. Tapia. 2017. “Organizational best practices for transportation projects delivered using alternative contracting methods.” In Proc., 6th Engineering, Science and Technology Conf. 2017. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: KNE Publishing.
Griffith, A. F., and G. E. Gibson. 1997a. “Alignment of cross-functional teams during pre-project planning.” In Proc., 28th Annual PMI Seminars and Symp., 38–43. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Griffith, A. F., and G. E. Gibson. 1997b. “Team alignment during pre-project planning of capital facilities.” In Proc., Report to the Construction Industry Institute, 113–112. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Griffith, A. F., and G. E. Gibson. 2001. “Alignment during preproject planning.” J. Manage. Eng. 17 (2): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:2(69).
Hamilton, M. R., and G. E. Gibson. 1998. “Benchmarking preproject planning effort.” J. Manage. Eng. 12 (2): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:2(25).
Hayter, A. J. 2002. Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth Group.
Heinemann, G. D., and A. M. Zeiss. 2002. Team performance in health care: Assessment and development: Issues in the practice of psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido. 1998. “Comparison of US project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435).
Lehmann, E. L. 2006. Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. New York: Springer.
McLaughlin, J. 2017. “What is organizational culture? Definition and characteristics.” Accessed August 28, 2018. http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-organizational-culture-definition-characteristics.html.
Miller, J. B., M. J. Garvin, C. W. Ibbs, and S. E. Mahoney. 2000. “Toward a new paradigm: Simultaneous use of multiple project delivery methods.” J. Manage. Eng. 16 (3): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:3(58).
Molenaar, K. R., A. D. Songer, and M. Barash. 1999. “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 15 (2): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54).
Montgomery, D., G. Runger, and N. Hubele. 2004. Engineering statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Moore, C. M. 1987. In Vol. 9 of Group techniques for idea building: Applied social research methods series. London: Sage.
Moreland, R. L., L. Argote, and R. Krishnan. 1998. “Training people to work in groups.” In Theory and research on small groups, 37–60. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Oberlender, G. D., and S. M. Trost. 2001. “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates based on estimate quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (3): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:3(173).
Ochieng, G. E., and A. D. Price. 2009. “Framework for managing multicultural project teams.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 16 (6): 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980911002557.
Ott, R. L. 1993. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Incorporated.
Payne, J., K. Thomas, M. Perkins, R. Parker, and J. Small. 2003. Working in an integrated team. London: Construction Productivity Network.
Piderit, S. K. 2000. “Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 25 (4): 783–794. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707722.
Pinto, M. 1990. “Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development.” J. Prod. Innovation Manage. 7 (3): 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.730200.
Ramsey, D., M. El Asmar, and G. E. Gibson, Jr. 2016. “Quantitative performance assessment of single-step versus two-step design-build procurement.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001145.
Ramsey, F. L., and D. W. Schafer. 1997. The statistical sleuth: A course in methods of data analysis. Stamford, CT: Duxbury Press.
Samuel, M. 1996. High performance teams: Separating truths from myths. Los Angeles: IMPAQ Corporation.
Sawiris, R., C. S. Howes, J. A. Rodriguez, and W. L. Foley. 2015. “Uncertainty and risk management plans are critical for team alignment and better decision quality.” In Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Shrestha, P. P., J. T. O’Connor, and G. E. Gibson, Jr. 2012. “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000390.
Strategic Forum for Construction. 2013. “The integration toolkit guide: Integrated project team.” Accessed August 28, 2018. http://icwtoolkit.com/integrated-project-team/.
Sullivan, J., M. E. Asmar, J. Chalhoub, and H. Obeid. 2017. “Two decades of performance comparisons for design–build construction manager at risk and design–bid–build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282.
Vogt, P. W., and B. R. Johnson. 2016. The Sage dictionary of statistics and methodology. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ward, J. L. 2008. Dictionary of project management terms. 3rd ed. Arlington, VA: ESI International.
Wei, C. C., C. F. Chien, and M. J. J. Wang. 2005. “An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004.
Winograd, T. 1993. “Categories, disciplines, and social coordination.” Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 2 (3): 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749016.
Woods, C. 2017. “What is employee turnover? Definition, cost and reasons.” Accessed August 28, 2018. http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-employee-turnover-definition-cost-reasons.html.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: May 22, 2018
Accepted: Mar 7, 2019
Published online: Aug 14, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Evan Bingham, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Construction and Facilities Management, Ira A Fulton College of Engineering and Technology, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
G. Edward Gibson Jr., Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Sunstate Chair of Construction Management and Engineering, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box, 873005 Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. Email: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor and Senior Sustainability Scientist, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share