System-Level Approach for Identifying Main Uncertainty Sources in Pavement Construction Life-Cycle Assessment for Quantifying Environmental Impacts
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 2
Abstract
Poor data quality in pavement construction life-cycle inventory (LCI) causes uncertainty in quantifying the associated environmental impact through life-cycle assessment (LCA). To reduce such LCA uncertainty while enhancing the reliability, several studies have been conducted on a screening procedure based on a quality assessment of the LCI input data to identify main sources of the resulting uncertainty. However, they often create additional uncertainty in the screening process and thus result in erroneous outcomes in identifying main uncertainty sources. This paper proposes a new system-level approach that enables the identification of main uncertainty sources through input data quality assessment upon reducing additional uncertainty. Based on the proposed preset criteria and by leveraging environmental emission quantities associated with each process, the authors first propose to achieve a consistent weighting process and then derive the system-level aggregated data quality indicator (ADQI). By utilizing the ADQI, system-level LCA uncertainty information is obtained through a modified beta distribution. The proposed method was evaluated through case studies on real-world pavement construction projects of the Illinois Tollway, and the main uncertainty sources, named key processes, were identified through sensitivity analyses. In the case studies, the plant operation, cement production, and binder production were identified as key processes in the given pavement construction project, contributing more than half of the total uncertainty resulting from poor data quality. Based on these findings, the proposed work is expected to help practitioners improve the reliability of pavement construction LCA through uncertainty-informed decision making to better reflect real project characteristics in the identified key processes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.
References
Baek, C.-Y., K.-H. Park, K. Tahara, and Y.-Y. Chun. 2017. “Data quality assessment of the uncertainty analysis applied to the greenhouse gas emissions of a dairy cow system.” Sustainability 9 (10): 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101676.
Bare, J. 2011. “TRACI 2.0: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13 (5): 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0338-9.
Canter, K. G., D. J. Kennedy, D. C. Montgomery, J. B. Keats, and W. M. Carlyle. 2002. “Screening stochastic life cycle assessment inventory models.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7 (1): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978906.
Chiu, C.-T., T.-H. Hsu, and W.-F. Yang. 2008. “Life cycle assessment on using recycled materials for rehabilitating asphalt pavements.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 (3): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.07.001.
Coulon, R., V. Camobreco, H. Teulon, and J. Besnainou. 1997. “Data quality and uncertainty in LCI.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2 (3): 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978816.
Ecoinvent Centre. 2013. “Ecoinvent database v3 Ecoinvent report.” Accessed February 2, 2018. https://www.ecoinvent.org.
Finnveden, G., and L. Lindfors. 1998. “Data quality of life cycle inventory data: Rules of thumb.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 3 (2): 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978486.
Goedkoop, M., M. Oele, J. Leijting, T. Ponsioen, and E. Meijer. 2016. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro. Netherlands: PRé Consultants.
Groen, E. A., E. A. M. Bokkers, R. Heijungs, and I. J. M. de Boer. 2017. “Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22 (7): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1217-3.
Harvey, J. T., J. Meijer, H. Ozer, I. L. Al-Qadi, A. Saboori, and A. Kendall. 2016. Pavement life cycle assessment framework. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Heijungs, R. 1996. “Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life cycle assessments.” J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3–4): 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00042-X.
ISO. 2006. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. Geneva: ISO.
Ji, W., and S. M. AbouRizk. 2017. “Credible interval estimation for fraction nonconforming: Analytical and numerical solutions.” Autom. Constr. 83: 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.003.
Kennedy, D. J., D. C. Montgomery, and B. H. Quay. 1996. “Data quality: Stochastic environmental life cycle assessment modeling.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1 (4): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978693.
Law, A. M., and W. D. Kelton. 1982. Simulation modeling and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lloyd, S. M., and R. Ries. 2007. “Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches.” J. Ind. Ecol. 11 (1): 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1136.
Lu, J., G. Zhang, D. Ruan, and F. Wu. 2007. Multi-objective group decision making: Series in electrical and computer engineering. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Maurice, B., R. Frischknecht, V. Coelho-Schwirtz, and K. Hungerbuhler. 2000. “Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants.” J. Cleaner Prod. 8 (2): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00324-8.
May, J. R., and D. J. Brennan. 2003. “Application of data quality assessment methods to an LCA of electricity generation.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8 (4): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978474.
Mutel, C. L., L. De Baan, and S. Hellweg. 2013. “Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: Methodology and case study.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (11): 5660–5667. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3050949.
Rousseaux, P., E. Labouze, Y.-J. Suh, I. Blanc, V. Gaveglia, and A. Navarro. 2001. “An overall assessment of life cycle inventory quality application to the production of polyethylene bottles.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 6 (5): 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978792.
Saaty, T. L. 1990. “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 (1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
Saaty, T. L. 2012. Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS.
Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Santero, N. J., E. Masanet, and A. Horvath. 2011. “Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55 (9–10): 801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010.
Tan, R. R., A. B. Culaba, and M. R. I. Purvis. 2002. “Application of possibility theory in the life-cycle inventory assessment of biofuels.” Int. J. Energy Res. 26 (8): 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.812.
USEPA. 1997. Exposure factors handbook. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Wang, E., and Z. Shen. 2013. “A hybrid data quality indicator and statistical method for improving uncertainty analysis in LCA of complex system-application to the whole-building embodied energy analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 43: 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.010.
Wang, E., Z. Shen, J. Neal, J. Shi, C. Berryman, and A. Schwer. 2012. “An AHP-weighted aggregated data quality indicator (AWADQI) approach for estimating embodied energy of building materials.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17 (6): 764–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0417-8.
Weidema, B. P. 1998. “Multi-user test of the data quality matrix for product life cycle inventory data.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 3 (5): 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979832.
Weidema, B. P., C. Bauer, R. Hischier, C. Mutel, T. Nemecek, J. Reinhard, C. O. Vadenbo, and G. Wernet. 2013. Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the Ecoinvent database version 3. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Ecoinvent Centre.
Weidema, B. P., and M. S. Wesnaes. 1996. “Data quality management for life cycle inventories—An example of using data quality indicators.” J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3–4): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1.
Weiland, C., and S. Muench. 2010. “Life-cycle assessment of reconstruction options for interstate highway pavement in Seattle, Washington.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2170: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2170-03.
Yang, R., W. Yoo, H. Ozer, and I. L. Al-Qadi. 2017. “Development and application of a roadway/roadside life-cycle assessment software for the Illinois Tollway.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Yu, B., Q. Liu, and X. Gu. 2018. “Data quality and uncertainty assessment methodology for pavement LCA.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 19 (6): 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1176166.
Zapata, P., and J. A. Gambatese. 2005. “Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 11 (1): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(9).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 2, 2018
Accepted: Aug 3, 2018
Published online: Dec 8, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 8, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.