Technical Papers
Sep 25, 2018

Risk Perception Comparison among Construction Safety Professionals: Delphi Perspective

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 12

Abstract

There is no doubt that US construction safety records have been improving over the years, yet hundreds of deaths occur annually as a result of jobsite incidents. This continuing injury trend requires further understanding of the causes of safety issues as well as what magnifies safety risk. This study aims to investigate the extent of the impact of different factors on worker safety risk. The factors, namely human, site conditions, psychological, environmental, social, economic, regulatory, ergonomic, and organizational, were developed as part of recently formulated degrees of connectivity (DoC) model scenarios utilizing the risk perception of different specialists. The risk perceptions associated with the factors as provided by construction safety university professors and practicing safety engineers are explored for comparison. The Delphi method was adopted to collect the required data from both mentioned groups. The results show that the participants perceive that site condition factors create the highest impact whereas the worker economic factor adds the lowest impact. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of risk perception, nor was there a clear impact of participant experience on the risk perception process and the factors under investigation. Safety planners can benefit from the study results by considering the level of impact that the factors have on worker safety. Moreover, when addressing safety on a project, both professors and engineers can contribute equally.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Sharing

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Higher Committee for Education in Iraq (HCED) with Grant No. D1000737. Additionally, the researchers would like to express deep appreciation to the professors and engineers who have taken the time to participate in this study.

References

Agyakwa-Baah, A., and N. Chileshe. 2010. “Construction professionals perception of risk assessment and management practices: Does length of service in construction industry matter.” In Proc., 26th Annual ARCOM Conf., edited by C. Egbu, 1219–1228. Leeds, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Alomari, K., and J. Gambatese. 2016. “Degrees of connectivity impact on construction worker safety.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, 2783–2792. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Fang, D., C. Wu, and H. Wu. 2015. “Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000355.
Gambatese, J., and K. Alomari. 2016. “Degrees of connectivity: Systems model for upstream risk assessment and mitigation.” Accid. Anal. Prev 93: 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.020.
Glendon, A. I., S. G. Clarke, and E. F. McKenna. 2006. Human safety and risk management. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hallowell, M. R. 2008. “A formal model for construction safety and health risk management.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
Hallowell, M. R., and J. Gambatese. 2010. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Heath, L., R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, E. Henderson-King, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, and J. Myers. 1994. Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues. New York: Plenum Press.
Hinze, J. 2006. Construction safety. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hinze, J., and J. Gambatese. 2003. “Factors that influence safety performance of specialty contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (2): 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(159).
Hosseinian, S., and Z. Torghabeh. 2012. “Major theories of construction accident causation models: A literature review.” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 4 (2): 53.
Kim, H., H. Lee, M. Park, and K. Lee. 2010. “Influence factor-based safety risk assessment methodology for construction site.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010, 1356–1365. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Li, R. Y. M. 2015. Construction safety and waste management: An economic analysis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Linstone, H. A. 1985. “The Delphi technique.” In Vol. 4 of Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis. NATO ASI Series (Series G: Ecological Sciences), edited by V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. Stallen, and V. R. R. Uppuluri. Berlin: Springer.
Martin, H., and T. Lewis. 2013. “Pinpointing safety leadership factors for safe construction sites in Trinidad and Tobago.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 40 (2): 04013046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000795.
McDonald, J. H. 2014. Handbook of biological statistics. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Sparky House.
Namian, M., A. A. Albert, C. Zuluaga, and M. Behm. 2016. “Role of safety training: Impact on hazard recognition and safety risk perception.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001198.
Nnaji, C., and J. Gambatese. 2016. “Worker distraction impacts on safety and work quality: An energy component.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 3005–3014. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rasmussen, J., A. M. Pejtersen, and L. P. Goodstein. 1994. Cognitive system engineering. New York: Wiley.
Reason, J. T. 1990. Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rodríguez-Garzón, I., M. Martínez-Fiestas, A. Delgado-Padial, and V. Lucas-Ruiz. 2016. “An exploratory analysis of perceived risk among construction workers in three Spanish-speaking countries.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (11): 04016066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001187.
Shen, Y., T. Koh, S. Rowlinson, and A. Bridge. 2015. “Empirical investigation of factors contributing to the psychological safety climate on construction sites.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (11): 04015038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001021.
Siegel, S., and N. J. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sjöberg, L. 1999. “Risk perception by the public and by experts: A dilemma in risk management.” Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6 (2): 1–9.
Skulmoski, G. J., F. T. Hartman, and J. Krahn. 2007. “The Delphi method for graduate research.” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 6: 1–21.
Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of risk.” Science 236 (4799): 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507.
Slovic, P., and E. U. Weber. 2002. “Perception of risk posed by extreme events.” In Proc., Risk Management Strategies in an Uncertain World. New York: Columbia Univ.
Terwel, K., and S. Jansen. 2014. “Critical factors for structural safety in the design and construction phase.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000560.
Thompson, M., R. J. Ellis, A. Wildavsky, and T. Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural theory. 1st ed. New York: Westview Press.
Tymvios, N., and J. Gambatese. 2016. “Direction for generating interest for design for construction worker safety: A Delphi study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (8): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001134.
Veltri, A. T. 1985. “Expected use of management principles for safety function management.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Learning Sciences and Human Development, West Virginia Univ.
Winter, J., and D. Dodou. 2010. “Five-point Likert items: t-test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 15 (11): 1–12.
Zhang, R., H. Lingard, R. Wakefield, and B. Kleiner. 2014. “Analysis of difference/similarity between construction project participants work health and safety (WHS) risk perceptions.” In Proc., CIB W099 Achieving Sustainable Construction Health and Safety. Lund, Sweden.
Zuluaga, C., N. Namian, and A. Albert. 2016. “Impact of training methods on hazard recognition and risk perception in construction.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 2861–2871. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 12December 2018

History

Received: Dec 30, 2017
Accepted: Jun 4, 2018
Published online: Sep 25, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kasim A. Alomari [email protected]
Assistant Professor, College of Engineering, Univ. of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah 64001, Iraq (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
John A. Gambatese, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. Email: [email protected]
Nicholas Tymvios, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, PA 17837. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share