Technical Papers
Jul 18, 2018

Best-Value Procurement in Design-Bid-Build Construction Projects: Empirical Analysis of Selection Outcomes

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 10

Abstract

Best-value (BV) procurement is increasingly used in conventional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery, which raises questions regarding the influence of qualifications-based evaluation criteria when selecting construction contractors. The objectives of this study are to (1) examine BV procurement outcomes that can be expected from DBB projects, (2) determine which evaluation criteria have the greatest dispersion among competing contractors, and (3) identify whether a relationship exists between cost- and qualifications-based proposal submissions. A sample of 162 public institutional BV-procured DBB projects was collected that include evaluation results of 684 contractor proposals. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used, including coefficient of variation and correlation analysis of evaluation criteria. The results show that BV-selected contractors offer substantial qualifications benefits in comparison with lowest- and average-bidder alternatives. Certain qualifications-based criteria, such as technical proposals, contractor interview scores, and safety proposals were found to have a greater dispersion among competing bidders than cost proposals. Contributions of this study to the body of knowledge include a sizable empirical data set of BV-procured DBB projects in the vertical sector and a unit of measure that considers dispersion among competing contractor proposals. In current construction industry practice, it is recommended that project owners consider BV for complex DBB projects and prioritize certain qualifications-based criteria that are well-suited for differentiating between competing contractor proposals.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Abdelrahman, M., T. Zayed, and A. Elyamany. 2008. “Best-value model based on project specific characteristics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (3): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(179).
Abdi, H. 2010. “Coefficient of variation.” In Encyclopedia of research design, 169–171. New York: Wiley.
ACEC (American Council of Engineering Companies). 2018. “The Brooks Act: Federal Government Selection of Architects and Engineers.” Accessed June 23, 2018. https://www.acec.org.
AGC and NASFA (Associated General Contractors and National Association of State Facilities Administrators). 2008. Best practices for use of best value selections, 5–49. Houston: AGC and NASFA.
AGC (Associated General Contractors). 2009. “Qualifications based selection of contractors.” Accessed October 10, 2017. https://www.aiacc.org.
AGC (Associated General Contractors). 2017. “Construction is not a ‘commodity’.” Accessed October 10, 2017. https://www.agc.org.
Ahmed, J., N. Gharaibeh, and I. Damnjanovic. 2012. “Best-value bid selection methods for performance-based roadway maintenance contracts.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2292 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2292-02.
Alleman, D., A. Antoine, D. Gransberg, and K. Molenaar. 2017. “Comparison of qualifications-based selection and best-value procurement for construction manager-general contractor highway construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2630: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2630-08.
Amiri, S. 2016. “Revisiting inference of coefficient of variation: Nuisances parameters.” Stat. 5 (1): 234–241. https://doi10.1002/sta4.116.
California State Senate. 2015. “Senate Bill 762: Competitive bidding: Best value: Pilot program: Design-build.” Accessed February 24, 2018. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_762_bill_20151008_chaptered.pdf.
Chinowsky, P. S., and G. A. Kingsley. 2009. An analysis of issues pertaining to qualifications-based selection. Washington, DC: American Council of Engineering Companies and American Public Works Association.
Christodoulou, S., F. Griffis, L. Barrett, and M. Okungbowa. 2004. “Qualifications-based selection of professional A/E services.” J. Manage. Eng. 20 (2): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:2(34).
CMAA (Construction Management Association of America). 2012. An owner’s guide to project delivery methods, 10. McLean, VA: CMAA.
Curto, J. D., and J. C. Pinto. 2008. “The coefficient of variation asymptotic distribution in the case of non-iid random variables.” J. Appl. Stat. 36 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760802382491.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). 2012. “DBIA position statement—Qualification based selection.” Accessed October 15, 2017. https://www.dbia.org.
El Wardani, M., J. Messner, and M. Horman. 2006. “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (3): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(230).
Forkman, J. 2009. “Estimator and tests for common coefficients of variation in normal distributions.” Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 38 (2): 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920802187448.
Forkman, J., and S. Verrill. 2008. “The distribution of McKay’s approximation for the coefficient of variation.” Stat. Probab. Lett. 78 (1): 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2007.04.018.
Fung, W. K., and T. S. Tsang. 1998. “A simulation study comparing tests for the equality of coefficients of variation.” Stat. Med. 17 (17): 2003–2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980915)17:17%3C2003::AID-SIM889%3E3.0.CO;2-I.
Gransberg, D., and J. Shane. 2015. “Defining best value for construction manager/general contractor projects: The CMGC learning curve.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (4): 4014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275.
Gransberg, D. D., and M. A. Ellicott. 1997. “Best-value contracting criteria.” Cost Eng. 39 (6): 31–34.
Hopp, W. J., and M. L. Spearman. 2008. Factory physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kelley, K. 2007. “Sample size planning for the coefficient of variation from the accuracy in parameter estimation approach.” Behav. Res. Methods 39 (4): 755–766. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192966.
McKeon, J. 2016. “Construction management: Evolution of a profession.” Construction Management Association of America. Accessed October 16, 2017. https://www.cmaanet.org.
Miller, G. E. 2007. “Use of the squared ranks test to test for the equality of the coefficients of variation.” Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 20 (2–3): 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919108812981.
MnDOT (Minnesota Department of Transportation). 2012. “Best-value procurement manual.” MnDOT Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting. Accessed October 14, 2017. https://www.dot.state.mn.us.
Molenaar, K., N. Sobin, and E. Antillón. 2010. “A synthesis of best-value procurement practices for sustainable design-build projects in the public sector.” J. Green Build. 5 (4): 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.4.148.
Perrenoud, A., B. Lines, J. Savicky, and K. Sullivan. 2017. “Using best-value procurement to measure the impact of initial risk-management capability on qualitative construction performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000535.
Poshdar, M., V. A. González, G. M. Raftery, and F. Orozco. 2014. “Characterization of process variability in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (11): 05014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000901.
Richey, E. 2012. “Despite transparency, dispute erupts on California library project.” Engineering News-Record. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.enr.com.
Sandquist, R. 2007. “Qualifications-based vs. low-bid contractor selection.” American Institute of Architects. Accessed October 15, 2017. http://www.wyattmgmt.com.
Schleifer, T. C. 2017. “Mitigating the hidden risks in the ‘new normal’ construction environment.” Surety Bond Q. 4 (2): 12–17.
Schleifer, T. C., K. T. Sullivan, and J. M. Murdough. 2014. Managing the profitable construction business: The contractor’s guide to success and survival strategies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sullivan, K., and Y. Guo. 2009. “Contractor cash flow and profitability analysis between best value and low bid.” Cost Eng. 51 (9): 16–20.
Tian, L. 2005. “Inferences on the common coefficient of variation.” Stat. Med. 24 (14): 2213–2220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2088.
Tran, D., K. Molenaar, and D. Gransberg. 2016. “Implementing best-value procurement for design-bid–build highway projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2573: 26–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/2573-04.
UCOP (University of California, Office of the President). 2018. “Best value construction contracting program.” Accessed February 24, 2018. https://www.ucop.edu.
Yu, W., and K. Wang. 2012. “Best value or lowest bid? A quantitative perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000414.
Yu, W., K. Wang, and M. Wang. 2013. “Pricing strategy for best value tender.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000635.
Zou, K. H., K. Tuncali, and S. G. Silverman. 2003. “Correlation and simple linear regression.” Radiology 227 (3): 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273011499.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 10October 2018

History

Received: Dec 13, 2017
Accepted: Apr 17, 2018
Published online: Jul 18, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 18, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Phuong H. D. Nguyen, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2150 Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Brian C. Lines, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2135B Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. Email: [email protected]
Dai Q. Tran, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2135C Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share