Technical Papers
Jul 3, 2018

Compaction Quality Control of Earth Fills Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 9

Abstract

Quality control for compaction of earth fills is commonly performed by measuring the in situ density using the sand cone method. In situ density measurements from sand cone testing are highly operator-dependent; in addition, the test procedure is tedious and time-consuming. In this study, a dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) was used to perform quality control (QC) of earthworks by measuring penetration resistance in compacted soil. DCP tests were performed on three test pads specially constructed using different soil types—clayey sand with gravel, clayey sand, and silty sand. The test results were expressed in terms of a dynamic penetration index (DPI), defined as the depth of penetration of the cone per hammer blow. Correlations are developed between DPI and compacted density for the three soil types considered. In order to meet the criterion of compacted density equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum density from a laboratory standard Proctor test, DPI values are found to range from 5 to 8  mm/blow, corresponding to 250 mm penetration of cone on tested soil types. The effect of the fall height of the hammer on the measured DPI is also studied by performing DCP tests for two fall heights, 575 and 450 mm. DPI values are found to increase by 11–26% when the height of the fall increases from 450 to 575 mm, for the highest energy level considered in the study. It is also found that DPI is very sensitive to the moisture content and in situ density of compacted layers. The DCP device provided quick test results and was simple to operate on any subgrade layer; hence, the frequency of QC tests can be increased, leading to an improvement in the overall quality of compaction of earthworks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Alshibli, K., M. Abu-Farsakh, and E. Seyman. 2005. “Laboratory evaluation of the geogauge and light falling weight deflectometer as construction control tools.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 17 (5): 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(560).
Ampadu, S. I. K., and T. D. Arthur. 2005. “The dynamic cone penetrometer in compaction verification on a model road pavement.” Geotech. Test. J. 29 (1): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12306.
AS (Australia Standards). 1997. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes: Soil strength and consolidation tests: Determination of the penetration resistance of a soil: 9 kg dynamic cone penetrometer test. AS 1289.6.3.2. Sydney, Australia: AS.
ASTM. 2007a. Standard test method for determination of the impact value of a soil. ASTM D5874. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007b. Standard test method for determination of water (moisture) content of soil by direct heating. ASTM D4959. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007c. Standard test method for measuring deflections with a light weight deflectometer (LWD). ASTM E2583. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007d. Standard test method for measuring stiffness and apparent modulus of soil and soil-aggregate in-place by an electro-mechanical method. ASTM D6758. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007e. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007f. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. ASTM D6951. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2008. Standard test methods for density and unit weight of soil and rock in place by the sand replacement method in a test pit. ASTM D4914. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test method for in-place density and water content of soil and soil-aggregate by nuclear methods. ASTM D6938. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. Standard test method for field determination of water (moisture) content of soil by the calcium carbide gas pressure tester. ASTM D4944. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for California bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. ASTM D1883. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Burnham, T. R. 1997. Application of the dynamic cone penetrometer to Minnesota department of transportation pavement assessment procedures. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Coonse, J. 1999. “Estimating California bearing ratio of cohesive piedmont residual soil using the Scala dynamic cone penetrometer.” Masters thesis, Dept. of civil, construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ.
Edil, T. B., and C. H. Benson. 2005. Investigation of the DCP and SSG as alternative methods to determine subgrade stability. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin.
Elias, P. E. V., B. R. Christopher, and R. R. Berg. 2001. Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced slopes: Design and construction guidelines. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Transportation.
Embacher, R. 2006. “Duration of spring thaw recovery for aggregate-surfaced roads.” J. Transp. Res. Board 1967: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3141/1967-04.
Ese, D., J. Myre, P. Noss, and E. Vaernes. 1994. “The use of dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for road strengthening design in Norway.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, 3–22. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Fumio, O., H. Shuzo, and S. H. Urushizaki. 2004. “Data logger penetrator-dynamic cone penetrator with data logger: An unique logging tool for near surface soil investigation.” In Proc., 10th Formation Evaluation Symp. Chiba, Japan: Japan Formation Evaluation Society.
Gabr, M. A., K. Hopkins, J. Coonse, and T. Hearne. 2000. “DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 14 (4): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2000)14:4(141).
Ganju, E., H. Kim, M. Prezzi, R. Salgado, and N. Z. Siddiki. 2016. “Quality assurance and quality control of subgrade compaction using the dynamic cone penetrometer.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1227664.
Harison, J. A. 1987. “Correlation between California bearing ratio and dynamic cone penetrometer strength measurement of soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 83 (4): 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1987.204.
IRC (Indian Roads Congress). 2000. Guidelines on quality systems for roads. IRC:SP:57. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Kim, H., M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado. 2010. Use of dynamic cone penetration and Clegg hammer tests for quality control of roadway compaction and construction. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Kleyn, E. G. 1975. The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP). Pretoria, South Africa: Transvaal Roads Dept.
Krebs, R. D., and E. D. Walker. 1971. Highway materials, 428. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lee, C., K. S. Kim, W. Woo, and W. Lee. 2014. “Soil stiffness gauge (SSG) and dynamic cone penetrometer tests for estimating engineering properties of weathered sandy soils in Korea.” Eng. Geol. 169: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.010.
Livneh, M. 1989. “Validation of correlations between a number of penetration tests and in situ California bearing ratio tests.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1219: 56–67.
Livneh, M. 1991. “Verification of California bearing ratio and elastic modulus values from local DCP tests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 9th Asian Regional Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 45–50. Bangkok, Thailand: Southeast Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Livneh, M., I. Ishai, and N. A. Livneh. 1994. “Effect of vertical confinement on dynamic cone penetrometer strength values in pavement and subgrade evaluations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1473: 1–8.
Livneh, M., N. S. Livneh, and I. Ishai. 2000. “The Israeli experience with the regular and extended dynamic cone penetrometer for pavement and subsoil-strength evaluation.” In Vol. 3 of ASTM STP 1375: Nondestructive testing of pavements and back-calculation of moduli, edited by S. D. Tayabji and E. O. Lukanen. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
McCook, D. K., and D. W. Shanklin. 2000. “NRCS experience with field density test methods including the sand cone, nuclear gauge, rubber balloon, drive-cylinder, and clod test.” In ASTM STP1384: Constructing and controlling compaction of earth fills, edited by D. W. Shanklin, K. R. Rademacher, and J. R. Talbot, 72–92. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Meehan, C. L., F. S. Tehrani, and F. Vahedifard. 2012. “A comparison of density-based and modulus-based in situ test measurements for compaction control.” Geotech. Test. J. 35 (3): 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103479.
Mohammad, L. N., M. D. Nazzal, M. Abu-Farsakh, and K. Alshibli. 2009. “Estimation of subgrade soils resilient modulus from in situ devices test results.” J. Test. Eval. 37 (3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE101993.
Mohammadi, D., M. R. Nikoudel, H. Rahimi, and M. Khamehchiyan. 2008. “Application of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for determination of the engineering parameters of sandy soils.” Eng. Geol. 101 (3–4): 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.05.006.
Ping, W. V., Z. Yang, and Z. Gao. 2002. “Field and laboratory determination of granular subgrade moduli.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 16 (4): 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2002)16:4(149).
Rahman, F., M. Hossain, M. M. Hunt, and S. A. Romanoschi. 2008. “Soil stiffness evaluation for compaction control of cohesionless embankments.” Geotech. Test. J. 31 (5): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100971.
Salgado, R., and S. Yoon. 2003. Dynamic cone penetration test (DCPT) for subgrade assessment. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Scala, A. J. 1956. “Simple methods of flexible pavement design using cone penetrometers.” N. Z. Eng. 11 (2): 34–44.
Sebesta, S., C. Estakhri, T. Scullion, and W. Liu. 2006. New technologies for evaluating flexible pavement construction. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Siekmeier, J., C. Pinta, S. Merth, J. Jensen, P. Davich, F. Camargo, and M. Beyer. 2009. Using the dynamic cone penetrometer and light weight deflectometer for construction quality assurance. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Talbot, J. R. 2000. “Evaluation of procedures presented in TR-26 and TR-27 for design and construction of earth fills using soil containing oversize rock particles.” In ASTM STP1384: Constructing and controlling compaction of earth fills, edited by D. W. Shanklin, K. R. Rademacher, and J. R. Talbot, 185–196. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Van Vuuren, D. J. 1969. “Rapid determination of CBR with the portable dynamic cone penetrometer.” Rhodesian Eng. 7 (5): 852.
Webster, S. L., R. H. Grau, and R. P. Williams. 1992. Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineering Waterways Experiment Station.
Yang, B., R. Zhang, X. Zha, C. Liu, and Q. Pan. 2016. “Improved testing method of dynamic cone penetrometer in laboratory for evaluating compaction properties of soil subgrade.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 17 (2): 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1091375.
Yoon, S., B. Umashankar, I. Z. Yildirim, M. Prezzi, and N. Z. Siddiki. 2009. “Construction of embankment with a fly and bottom ash mixture: Field performance study.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 21 (6): 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(271).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Aug 23, 2017
Accepted: Mar 2, 2018
Published online: Jul 3, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hariprasad Chennarapu [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Vardhaman College of Engineering, Kacharam, Hyderabad, Telangana 501218, India; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, IIT Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India. Email: [email protected]
Thejesh Kumar Garala [email protected]
Formerly, Masters Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India. Email: [email protected]
Rajasekhar Chennareddy [email protected]
Formerly, Masters Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological Univ., Hyderabad, Telangana 500085, India. Email: [email protected]
Umashankar Balunaini [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
G. Venkata Narasimha Reddy [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological Univ., Hyderabad, Telangana 500085, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share