Technical Papers
May 29, 2018

Beyond the Iron Triangle in Public Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 8

Abstract

Traditionally, construction professionals have focused on time, cost, and quality tradeoffs for successful completion of public construction projects. In addition to this, no-dispute and safety criteria have also been added, but the distinguishing feature of public construction projects is the oversight mechanism. Therefore, compliance with audit regulation and transparency parameters is a must. Defenders of financial- and transparency-related regulations assert that these are necessary for fair performance and can help prevent corruption. However, their compliance is still felt to be a hindrance in the domain of public construction projects and remains a neglected area. It is hypothesized that public construction project performance is influenced by the compliance of norms, composed of transparency- and audit-related variables. This study validated the relationship between compliance of audit and transparency regulations and public construction project performance. Thereafter, the irregularities related to audit and transparency regulations were studied to develop a comprehensive list based on a questionnaire survey using the Delphi method of analysis. The findings reveal the frequently, sometimes, and seldom occurring irregularities, which, if taken care of, will help in making the project transparent and audit-compliant. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to adopt the compliance of audit and transparency norms as one of the criteria in public construction projects besides time, cost, quality, safety, and no-dispute to reduce corruption. This qualitative study from the Indian perspective can be applied to the entire public projects domain worldwide after customization of relevant items.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Alvaro, C.-C. 2016. “Corruption in international business.” J. World Bus. 51 (1): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.015.
Andres, S. M., R. R. Vila, and J. B. Mira. 2016. “Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education.” Int. J. Educ. Technol. Higher Educ. 13 (12): 1–11.
Atkinson, R. 1999. “Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (6): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6.
Augilar, M. A., J. B. S. Gill, and L. Pino. 2000. Preventing fraud and corruption in World Bank projects: A guide for staff. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Basheka, B. C. 2008. “Procurement planning and accountability of local government procurement system in developing countries: Evidence from Uganda.” J. Public Procurement 8 (13): 379–406.
Bentler, P. M., and K. H. Yuan. 2010. “Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics.” Multivariate Behav. Res. 34 (2): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906Mb340203.
Billy, H., I. Cameron, and A. R. Duff. 2006. “Exploring the integration of health and safety with pre-construction planning.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 13 (5): 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610690729.
CGD (Center for Global Development). 2014. “A report of the CGD working group on contract publication.” Accessed 27 January, 2016. http://www.cgdev.org.
Chen, Y. Q., Y. B. Zhang, J. Y. Liu, and P. Mo. 2012. “Interrelationships among critical success factors of construction projects based on the structural equation model.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (3): 243–251.
Choi, J. W. 2010. “A study of the role of public procurement—Can public procurement make society better?” In Proc., 4th Int. Public Procurement Conf. in South Korea. Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press.
Churchill, G. A. 1995. “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs.” J. Market. Res. 16 (3): 64–73.
Dunn, S. C., R. F. Seaker, and M. A. Waller. 1994. “Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation.” J. Bus. Logist. 15 (2): 145–172.
Garver, M. S., and J. T. Mentzer. 1999. “Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity.” J. Bus. Logist. 20 (1): 33–57.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hallowell, M., and R. J. A. Gambatese. 2010. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Haslam, R. A., S. A. Hide, A. G. F. Gibb, D. E. Gyi, T. Pavitt, S. Atkinson, and A. R. Duff. 2005. “Contributing factors in construction accidents.” Appl. Ergon. 36 (4): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002.
Jackson, D. L. 2001. “Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation.” Struct. Equation Model. 8 (2): 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_3.
Jones, D. 2010. “Competition and transparency in government procurement in Southeast Asia.” In The many faces of public management reform in the Asia Pacific region, edited by C. Wescott, B. Boworrwathana, and L. R. Jones. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kling, R. 2008. “Taxpayers are fighting back: Transparency and accountability does not mean inefficiency.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Public Procurement Conf. Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press.
Koelmans, R. G. 2004. “Project success and performance evaluation.” In Proc., Int. Platinum Conf. on ‘Platinum Adding Value’. Marshalltown, IA: South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Krosnick, J. A. 1999. “Survey research.” Ann. Rev. Psychol. 50 (1): 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537.
Kumar, D. 1989. “Developing strategies and philosophies early for successful project implementation.” Project Manage. J. 7 (3): 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(89)90035-5.
Lam, B. C., and A. M. Liu. 2005. “Bureaucracy and red tape in public and private construction project organisation.” Survey. Built Environ. 16 (2): 33–42.
Le, Y., M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Overview of corruption research in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (4): 02514001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000300.
Lourenco, R. P. 2013. “Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: A strategy and case analysis.” Inf. Polity 18 (3): 243–260.
Michener, G., and K. Bersch. 2013. “Identifying transparency.” Inf. Polity 18 (3): 233–242.
Molenaar, K., S. Washington, and J. Diekmann. 2000. “Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (4): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268).
Molwus, J. J., B. Erdogan, and S. O. Ogunlana. 2013. “Sample size and model fit indices for structural equation modelling (SEM): The case of construction management research.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Construction and Real Estate Management, 338–347. Karlsruhe, Germany.
MOSPI (Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation). 2008. “Infrastructure and project monitoring division.” Accessed May 15, 2008. http://www.mospi.gov.in.
OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2007. Integrity in public procurement: Good practices from A to Z. Paris: OECD.
Ohashi, H. 2009. “Effects of transparency in procurement practices on government expenditure: A case study of municipal public works.” Rev. Ind. Organ. 34 (3): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9208-1.
PPD (Public Procurement Directorate). 2003. “Public procurement reforms strategy: The Kenya experience.” Accessed 23 November, 2009. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/…/kenyacase3_e.doc.
Shan, M., A. Chan, Y. Le, B. Xia, and Y. Hu. 2015. “Measuring corruption in public construction projects in China.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (4): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000241.
Sohail, M., and S. Cavill. 2008. “Accountability to prevent corruption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (9): 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:9(729).
Søreide, T. 2002. “Corruption in public procurement: Causes, consequences and cures.” Accessed May 15, 2008. http://www.cmi.no.
Stansbury, N. 2005. “Transparency international preventing corruption on construction projects.” Accessed 12 March, 2008. http://www.transparency.org.
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2011a. “Analysis of irregularities in public procurement in India.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 29 (3): 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.549138.
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2011b. “Important factors for success of public construction projects.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Construction and Project Management IPEDR. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2012. “Success traits for a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (10): 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000538.
Thomas, S. N., M. W. W. Yoki, and W. M. W. James. 2010. “A structural equation model of feasibility evaluation and project success for public-private partnerships in Hong Kong.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 57 (2): 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2037142.
Transparency International. n.d. “Project anti-corruption system.” Accessed May 15, 2008. http://www.transparency.org/tools/contracting/construction_projects.
Transparency International. 2014. “Corruption perceptions index 2014.” Accessed March 12, 2016. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2006. Legislative guide for the implementation of the United Nations convention against corruption. New York, NY: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Widaman, K. F. 1985. “Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multi-trait-multi-method data.” Appl. Psychol. Meas. 9 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900101.
Wirick, D. 2009. Public-sector project management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wong, P. S. P., and S. O. Cheung. 2005. “Structural equation model of trust and partnering success.” J. Manage. Eng. 21 (2): 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:2(70).
Xiong, B., M. Skitmore, and B. Bo Xia. 2015. “A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research.” Autom. Constr. 49: 59–70.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Aug 22, 2017
Accepted: Jan 25, 2018
Published online: May 29, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Syed Zafar Shahid Tabish, Ph.D. [email protected]
Director, Office of Comptroller and Auditor General of India, 9-DDU Marg, New Delhi 110124, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Kumar Neeraj Jha, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share