Technical Papers
Feb 16, 2018

Risk Allocation in U.S. Public-Private Partnership Highway Project Contracts

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 5

Abstract

Risk is often discussed in connection with public-private partnerships (P3s), and risk allocation is likely a determinant of P3 success or failure. Despite being central to the delineation and allocation of risks, contracts have not been used directly to examine risks in P3s, particularly in the United States. Employing a systematic content analysis framework, the allocation of 31 risks in 21 U.S. highway P3 contracts was determined. These contracts represent the entire population of U.S. highway P3 projects from 2004 through first quarter of 2016 with the exception of one project whose contract was not made available. The results were internally validated through interrater testing and externally validated using bond offering statements. Hence, the investigation is unique in its approach and comprehensive scope. The allocation results demonstrate that some risks were retained by the public sector, but the majority of the 31 risks were either transferred to the private sector or shared. The former outcome is not unexpected because risk transfer is generally viewed as fundamental to the P3 value proposition; however, the prevalence of sharing in the United States market is greater than that conveyed in the literature examining risk allocation in other large markets such as Australia and the United Kingdom. Risk sharing arrangements uncovered ranged from deductible schemes to event mechanisms with the latter employed quite frequently; hence, contract designers rely on ex post remedies to address risks once an event, such as a change in law, occurs. Parametric analysis did not reveal any dominant trends in risk allocation, but examination by the most active jurisdictions (Florida, Texas, and Virginia) and source of risk (exogenous versus endogenous) illustrated that project context influences risk allocation. While some consistency was found in the treatment of the 31 risks, the variation in allocation is further evidence that project-specific factors and environments will continue to challenge efforts to create uniformity in P3 contractual provisions. Additionally, with the U.S. P3 market still evolving, the results provide practitioners implementing P3s or considering their implementation a comprehensive overview of risk allocation practices and contractual language across a variety of project characteristics. Consequently, the results can inform practitioner decisions regarding risk allocation and contract design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1333264. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Akintoye, A., Taylor, C., and Fitzgerald, E. (1998). “Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 5(1), 9–21.
Alonso-Conde, A. B., Brown, C., and Rojo-Suarez, J. (2007). “Public-private partnerships: Incentives, risk transfer and real options.” Review of Financial Economics, 16(4), 335–349.
Ball, R., Heafey, M., and King, D. (2003). “Risk transfer and value for money in PFI projects.” Public Manage. Rev., 5(2), 279–290.
Bazeley, P., and Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, Sage, London.
Beidleman, C. R., Fletcher, D., and Veshosky, D. (1990). “On allocating risk: The essence of project finance.” Sloan Manage. Rev., 31(3), 47–55.
Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., and Hardcastle, C. (2005). “The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the U.K.” Int. J. Project Manage., 23(1), 25–35.
Brealey, R., Myers, S. C., and Allen, F. (2016). Principles of corporate finance, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., Chan, D. W. M., Cheung, E., and Ke, Y. (2010a). “Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure developments: Chinese perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 484–494.
Chan, A. P. C., Yeung, J. F. Y., Yu, C. C. P., Wang, S. Q., and Ke, Y. (2010b). “Empirical study of risk assessment and allocation of public-private partnership projects in China.” J. Manage. Eng., 136–148.
Chiara, N., Garvin, M. J., and Vecer, J. (2007). “Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 97–104.
Chou, J., and Pramudawardhani, D. (2015). “Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 33(5), 1136–1150.
Chung, D., and Hensher, D. (2015). “Risk management in public-private partnerships.” Aust. Acc. Rev., 25(1), 13–27.
Chung, D., Hensher, D. A., and Rose, J. M. (2010). “Toward the betterment of risk allocation: Investigating risk perceptions of Australian stakeholder groups to public-private-partnership tollroad projects.” Res. Transp. Econ., 30(1), 43–58.
Cohen, J. (1960). “A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales.” Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20(1), 37–46.
Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dewulf, G., Garvin, M. J., and Duffield, C. (2015). “Multinational comparison of the tension between standards and context in PPP.” Public private partnerships in transport: Trends and theory, A. Roumboutsos, ed., Routledge Studies in Transport Analysis, New York, 267–291.
Dudkin, G., and Välilä, T. (2006). “Transaction costs in public-private partnerships: A first look at the evidence.” Compet. Regul. Network Ind., 1(2), 307–330.
Elo, S., and Kyngäs, H. (2008). “The qualitative content analysis process.” J. Adv. Nurs., 62(1), 107–115.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2017). “State P3 legislation.” ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/legislation⟩ (Dec. 22, 2017).
Flinders, M. (2002). “Governance in Whitehall.” Public Administration, 80(1), 51–75.
Gaffney, D., Pollock, A. M., Price, D., and Shaoul, J. (1999). “The private finance initiative: PFI in the NHS—Is there an economic case?” Br. Med. J., 319(7202), 116.
Garvin, M. J., and Bosso, D. (2008). “Assessing the effectiveness of infrastructure public-private partnership programs and projects.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 13(2), 162–178.
Graneheim, U. H., and Lundman, B. (2004). “Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.” Nurse Educ. Today, 24(2), 105–112.
Grimsey, D., and Lewis, M. K. (2002). “Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 20(2), 107–118.
Grove, S. K., Burns, N., and Gray, J. (2012). The practice of nursing research—Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence, Elsevier Health Sciences, Atlanta.
Hodge, G. A. (2004). “The risky business of public-private partnerships.” Aust. J. Public Administration, 63(4), 37–49.
Hollway, W. (1995). “Essay review. Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods.” Br. J. Psychol., 86(1), 157–159.
Hood, J., and McGarvey, N. (2002). “Managing the risks of public-private partnerships in Scottish local government.” Policy Stud., 23(1), 21–35.
Hwang, B. G., Zhao, X., and Gay, M. J. S. (2013). “Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors.” Int. J. Project Manage., 31(3), 424–433.
Iossa, E., and Martimort, D. (2012). “Risk allocation and the costs and benefits of public-private partnerships.” RAND J. Econ., 43(3), 442–474.
ISO. (2009). “Risk management-principles and guidelines.” ISO 31000:2009, Geneva.
Iyer, K. C., and Sagheer, M. (2009). “Hierarchical structuring of PPP risks using interpretative structural modeling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 151–159.
Kalidindi, S. N., and Thomas, A. V. (2003). “Private sector participation road projects in India: Assessment and allocation of critical risks.” Public-private partnerships, A. Akintoye, M. Beck, and C. Hardcastle, eds., Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, 317–350.
Ke, Y., Wang, S., and Chan, A. P. C. (2010). “Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: Comparative study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 343–351.
Kivleniece, I., and Quelin, B. V. (2012). “Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 37(2), 272–299.
Kolbe, R. H., and Burnett, M. S. (1991). “Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity.” J. Consum. Res., 18(2), 243–250.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). “Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations.” Human Commun. Res., 30(3), 411–433.
Krippendorff, K. H. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y., and Ibbs, C. W. (2009). “Towards a comprehensive understanding of public private partnerships for infrastructure development.” Calif. Manage. Rev., 51(2), 51–78.
Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. (1977). “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Li, B., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., and Hardcastle, C. (2005). “Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the U.K. construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(5), 459–471.
Miller, J. B. (1999). “Applying multiple project procurement methods to a portfolio of infrastructure projects.” Procurement systems: A guide to best practice in construction, S. Rowlinson and P. Mcdermott, eds., Routledge, New York, 209–227.
Ng, A., and Loosemore, M. (2007). “Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure.” Int. J. Project Manage., 25(1), 66–76.
Park, T., Kim, B., and Kim, H. (2013). “Real option approach to sharing privatization risk in underground infrastructures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 685–693.
Pollock, A. M., Shaoul, J., Rowland, D., and Player, S. (2001). “Public services and the private sector: A response to the IPPR Commission.” Catalyst, London.
QSR NVivo version 11 [Computer software]. QSR International Pty Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Quiggin, J. (2004). “Risk, PPPs and the public sector comparator.” Aust. Acc. Rev., 14(33), 51–61.
Quiggin, J. (2006). “Public-private partnerships: Options for improved risk allocation.” UNSW Law J., 29(3), 289–293.
Roberts, C. W. (1997). Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts, Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.
Roumboutsos, A., and Anagnostopoulos, K. P. (2008). “Public-private partnership projects in Greece: Risk ranking and preferred risk allocation.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(7), 751–763.
Shaoul, J. (2005). “A critical financial analysis of the private finance initiative: Selecting a financing method or allocating economic wealth?” Crit. Perspect. Acc., 16(4), 441–471.
Thomas, A. V., Kalidindi, S. N., and Ananthanarayanan, K. (2003). “Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(4), 393–407.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Yescombe, E. R. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.
Zhang, X. (2005). “Paving the way for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 71–80.
Zou, P. X. W., Wang, S., and Fang, D. (2008). “A life-cycle risk management framework for PPP infrastructure projects.” J. Financial Manage. Prop. Constr., 13(2), 123–142.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: Aug 10, 2017
Accepted: Oct 18, 2017
Published online: Feb 16, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 16, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Duc A. Nguyen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Faculty, Dept. of Building and Industrial Construction, National Univ. of Civil Engineering, 55 Giai Phong St., Hanoi, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael J. Garvin, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Edwin E. Gonzalez, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Advisor, CPM, Corporate Office Park, CPM Plaza, 44 Rd. 20 Suite 201, Guaynabo, PR 00966. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share