Method to Assess the Match between Clients’ Input and Decoupling Points in Customized Building Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 5
Abstract
Clients’ input (i.e., design drawings and specifications containing clients’ desired changes) is a key resource for task completion often missing in customized building projects, leading to waste such as additional movement, increase in work in progress, rework, stoppages, and delays. Such waste can be potentially reduced by postponing the moment in which such input is first needed [i.e., the decoupling point (DP)]. This paper proposes a simulation-based method to quantify the probability of having clients’ input according to production plans using the line-of-balance technique. The method is applied to two sets of plans to assess the effect of four variables (cycle time, batch size, work structure, and construction start time) on such probabilities. Work structure and construction start time were found to be the main variables affecting such probabilities. Nonetheless, preliminary results (considering a uniform probability distribution for clients’ input) indicate a minimal probability of having clients’ input according to production plans even for the most favorable plan (late construction start, DP in the last work package, short cycle time, and large batch size). This means that altering these variables is not sufficient to ensure the availability of clients’ input and other approaches are needed to support a good flow.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
Dr. da Rocha and Dr. Anzanello acknowledge the financial support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The authors also thank Alessandro Kahmann for his assistance in early developments of this research and also the reviewers for their comments, which greatly helped improving this manuscript.
References
Arditi, D., Tokdemir, O. B., and Suh, K. (2002). “Challenges in line-of-balance scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 545–556.
Ballard, G. (1999). “Work structuring.”, Lean Construction Institute, Ketchum, ID.
Ballard, G. (2000). “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Barlow, J. (1999). “From craft production to mass customisation. Innovation requirements for the UK housebuilding industry.” Hous. Stud., 14(1), 23–42.
Barlow, J., Childerhouse, P., Gann, D., Hong-Minh, S., Naim, M., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 134–145.
Barlow, J., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Achieving ‘customer focus’ in private housebuilding: Current practice and lessons from other industries.” Hous. Stud., 18(1), 87–101.
da Rocha, C. G., and Kemmer, S. L. (2013). “Method to implement delayed product differentiation in construction of high-rise apartment building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 5013001.
da Rocha, C. G., and Kemmer, S. L. (2015). “Closure to ‘Method to implement delayed product differentiation in construction of high-rise apartment building projects’ by Cecília Gravina da Rocha and Sergio Luiz Kemmer.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 7014004.
da Rocha, C. G., Kemmer, S. L., and Meneses, L. (2016). “Managing customization strategies to reduce workflow variations in house building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 5016005.
Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D., and Fogliatto, F. S. (2001). “Mass customization: Literature review and research directions.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 72(1), 1–13.
Farr, E. R. P., Piroozfar, P. A. E., and Robinson, D. (2014). “BIM as a generic configurator for facilitation of customisation in the AEC industry.” Autom. Constr., 45, 119–125.
Gosling, J., Pero, M., Schoenwitz, M., Towill, D., and Cigolini, R. (2016). “Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: An international perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 4016062.
Hoekstra, S., Romme, J., and Argelo, S. M., eds. (1992). Integral logistic structures: Developing customer-oriented goods flow, Industrial Press, New York.
Howell, G. A., Ballard, G., Tommelein, I. D., and Koskela, L. (2004). “Discussion of ‘Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle’ by H. Randolph Thomas, Michael J. Horman, Ubiraci Espinelli Lemes de Souza, and Ivica Zavřski.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 299–300.
Isaac, S., Bock, T., and Stoliar, Y. (2016). “A methodology for the optimal modularization of building design.” Autom. Constr., 65, 116–124.
Kemmer, S. L., Heineck, L. F. M., and Alves, T. D. C. (2008). “Using the line of balance for production system design.” 16th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, P. Tzortzopoulos and M. Kagioglou, eds., Manchester, U.K., 299–308.
Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Koskela, L. (2000). An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Linner, T., and Bock, T. (2012). “Evolution of large-scale industrialisation and service innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry.” Constr. Innovation, 12(2), 156–178.
Lucko, G., Alves, T. D. C. L., and Angelim, V. L. (2014). “Challenges and opportunities for productivity improvement studies in linear, repetitive, and location-based scheduling.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(6), 575–594.
Miranda, E., and Bourque, P. (2010). “Agile monitoring using the line of balance.” J. Syst. Software, 83(7), 1205–1215.
Mitropoulos, P., and Sanchez, R. (2016). “Criteria and considerations for project work structuring.” Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Manage. Procurement Law, 169(3), 124–130.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., and Berry, D. (1999). “Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 62(1–2), 107–118.
Olhager, J. (2003). “Strategic positioning of the order penetration point.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 85(3), 319–329.
Patchell, J. (2002). “Linking production and consumption: The coevolution of interaction systems in the Japanese house industry.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 92(2), 284–301.
Roy, R., and Cochrane, S. P. (1999). “Development of a customer focused strategy in speculative house building.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(6), 777–787.
Sacks, R. (2016). “What constitutes good production flow in construction?” Constr. Manage. Econ., 34(9), 641–656.
Sacks, R., and Goldin, M. (2007). “Lean management model for construction of high-rise apartment buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 374–384.
Sacks, R., Seppänen, O., Priven, V., and Savosnick, J. (2017). “Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 35(1–2), 45–63.
Tsao, C. C. Y. (2005). Use of work structuring to increase performance of project-based production systems, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Tsao, C. C. Y., Tommelein, I. D., Swanlund, E. S., and Howell, G. A. (2004). “Work structuring to achieve integrated product-process design.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 780–789.
Yang, B., and Burns, N. (2003). “Implications of postponement for the supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 41(9), 2075–2090.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 5 • May 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 18, 2017
Accepted: Sep 26, 2017
Published online: Feb 19, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 19, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.